Sugarfall 3,723 Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 I don't see the huge problem with it, whatever Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mitch XCX 1,026 Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 It can't damage her career in ANY possible way, it can only make her more/less rich and make people that own pets love her or her(Asia's) clothing line...it will give her a childish image and will take away any meaning or substance she has left in the general publics eyes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GagaMyBlood95 9,901 Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 it will give her a childish image and will take away any meaning or substance she has left in the general publics eyes Childish image? I guess her Dark Horse is upon us then.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lego 44,165 Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 Childish image? I guess her Dark Horse is upon us then.. Selling luxury clothes and accessories for pets suits more to Katy than Gaga. FreePalestine Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 David does it with class and it's marketed in an intelligent way, cosmetic sponsoring, perfume and so ( i don't like everything he does ) But these things are comsumed by normal people. Gaga has also this deal with japanese cosmetic company and she released her perfume. Okay, it's her business. People use perfumes and cosmetic.But to wear animal clothes and buy accessoires for them makes no sense at all - unless they need it really in winter. But it seems it's more about lifestyle and accessoires. Why a dog need accessoires and fancy clothes ? The target group are the people which Gaga sung about in The Fame with irony. Pet owners in the U.S. do dress their dogs, and no....it is not just rich people. Every income level has people that pamper their pets. You wouldn't be able to find dog clothes in Walmart and Target, if this was just something for rich people. Any local grocery store chain carries specialty food and treats in a seperate freezer section. Regular people spend money and make a big fuss over their pets. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewYorkCity 10,520 Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 Lol. yes, Bowie is a paragon of artistic integrity and would never stoop to having a side business like Gaga's... David Bowie: http://en.mediamass.net/people/david-bowie/highest-paid.html The British singer-songwriter has an estimated net worth of $145 million. He owes his fortune to smart stock investments, substantial property holdings, lucrative endorsement deals with CoverGirl cosmetics. He also owns several restaurants (the “Fat Bowie Burger” chain) in London, a Football Team (the “London Angels”), has launched his own brand of Vodka (Pure Wonderbowie - UK), and is tackling the juniors market with a top-selling perfume (With Love from David) and a fashion line called “David Bowie Seduction”. CLOCK HA. You should make a thread with this Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 it will give her a childish image and will take away any meaning or substance she has left in the general publics eyes Why? Because only children own pets and make a fuss over them? Nothing could be further from the truth. It's the adults, who make their own money, who are pampering their pets...in accordance with their income level. The pet business is HUGE in the U.S. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mitch XCX 1,026 Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 Why? Because only children own pets and make a fuss over them? Nothing could be further from the truth. It's the adults, who make their own money, who are pampering their pets...in accordance with their income level. The pet business is HUGE in the U.S. yes but it has absolutely nothing to do with her as a brand or as a person. just because she owns a dog doesn't make her an expert in the field of "dog fashion" every single album she's put out she's made a clear (sometimes pretentious) image and message to go along with them that she wants to be taken seriously, and then she puts out a range of clothes for dogs. its just not "gaga" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 yes but it has absolutely nothing to do with her as a brand or as a person. just because she owns a dog doesn't make her an expert in the field of "dog fashion" every single album she's put out she's made a clear (sometimes pretentious) image and message to go along with them that she wants to be taken seriously, and then she puts out a range of clothes for dogs. its just not "gaga" That's not what you said, you said it would damage her career by giving her a "childish image". That statement simply makes no sense, since pampering pets appeals to primarily adults. Ah, I just figured out why this is such a big deal here. This project, for the most part, doesn't really appeal to high school and college aged boys, living in their mommies house or in a dorm or apartment around campus. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
monstereo 1,232 Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 lol @ people thinking this is going to damage her image. nobody outside the fanbase is going to care about this tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bordeciel 323 Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 Lol. yes, Bowie is a paragon of artistic integrity and would never stoop to having a side business like Gaga's... David Bowie: http://en.mediamass.net/people/david-bowie/highest-paid.html The British singer-songwriter has an estimated net worth of $145 million. He owes his fortune to smart stock investments, substantial property holdings, lucrative endorsement deals with CoverGirl cosmetics. He also owns several restaurants (the “Fat Bowie Burger” chain) in London, a Football Team (the “London Angels”), has launched his own brand of Vodka (Pure Wonderbowie - UK), and is tackling the juniors market with a top-selling perfume (With Love from David) and a fashion line called “David Bowie Seduction”. I can't let you say this! 1. Mediamass is the worst site ever, 100% of what's written there is FAKE as Angela's Cheng articles. Like the one you've posted! 2. However and I need to defend David, he barely made money out of his first successfull albums because of his unability to make equal contract with his label. He had success but didn't took money out of it, he was a loser in the contract that he signed. The first album where he came for the money was Let's Dance in 1983, where he definetely came for the commercial success and the money that goes with it. It's actually the end of his "quality music career" at least for the 10 years that follows. Now his album are better. When it came to the artistic side I just can't let you say that Bowie one of the most sincere pop artist ever, that made successfull masterpiece for decades where he didn't got a lot of money from was before everything into cash! And it's more of the case when It comes to a fake and trashy website. Have a nice evening PS: Read this and understand why the website you've posted is totally wrong http://en.mediamass.net/blog/mediamass-project Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fame IV 4,426 Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 Seriously. What is your point? As a little monstermonster I must say that Gaga is also one of the most sincere artists I kno Seriou I can't let you say this! 1. Mediamass is the worst site ever, 100% of what's written there is FAKE as Angela's Cheng articles. Like the one you've posted! 2. However and I need to defend David, he barely made money out of his first successfull albums because of his unability to make equal contract with his label. He had success but didn't took money out of it, he was a loser in the contract that he signed. The first album where he came for the money was Let's Dance in 1983, where he definetely came for the commercial success and the money that goes with it. It's actually the end of his "quality music career" at least for the 10 years that follows. Now his album are better. When it came to the artistic side I just can't let you say that Bowie one of the most sincere pop artist ever, that made successfull masterpiece for decades where he didn't got a lot of money from was before everything into cash! And it's more of the case when It comes to a fake and trashy website. Have a nice evening PS: Read this and understand why the website you've posted is totally wrong http://en.mediamass.net/blog/mediamass-project I can't let you say this! 1. Mediamass is the worst site ever, 100% of what's written there is FAKE as Angela's Cheng articles. Like the one you've posted! 2. However and I need to defend David, he barely made money out of his first successfull albums because of his unability to make equal contract with his label. He had success but didn't took money out of it, he was a loser in the contract that he signed. The first album where he came for the money was Let's Dance in 1983, where he definetely came for the commercial success and the money that goes with it. It's actually the end of his "quality music career" at least for the 10 years that follows. Now his album are better. When it came to the artistic side I just can't let you say that Bowie one of the most sincere pop artist ever, that made successfull masterpiece for decades where he didn't got a lot of money from was before everything into cash! And it's more of the case when It comes to a fake and trashy website. Have a nice evening PS: Read this and understand why the website you've posted is totally wrong http://en.mediamass.net/blog/mediamass-project I can't let you say this! 1. Mediamass is the worst site ever, 100% of what's written there is FAKE as Angela's Cheng articles. Like the one you've posted! 2. However and I need to defend David, he barely made money out of his first successfull albums because of his unability to make equal contract with his label. He had success but didn't took money out of it, he was a loser in the contract that he signed. The first album where he came for the money was Let's Dance in 1983, where he definetely came for the commercial success and the money that goes with it. It's actually the end of his "quality music career" at least for the 10 years that follows. Now his album are better. When it came to the artistic side I just can't let you say that Bowie one of the most sincere pop artist ever, that made successfull masterpiece for decades where he didn't got a lot of money from was before everything into cash! And it's more of the case when It comes to a fake and trashy website. Have a nice evening PS: Read this and understand why the website you've posted is totally wrong http://en.mediamass.net/blog/mediamass-project I can't let you say this! 1. Mediamass is the worst site ever, 100% of what's written there is FAKE as Angela's Cheng articles. Like the one you've posted! 2. However and I need to defend David, he barely made money out of his first successfull albums because of his unability to make equal contract with his label. He had success but didn't took money out of it, he was a loser in the contract that he signed. The first album where he came for the money was Let's Dance in 1983, where he definetely came for the commercial success and the money that goes with it. It's actually the end of his "quality music career" at least for the 10 years that follows. Now his album are better. When it came to the artistic side I just can't let you say that Bowie one of the most sincere pop artist ever, that made successfull masterpiece for decades where he didn't got a lot of money from was before everything into cash! And it's more of the case when It comes to a fake and trashy website. Have a nice evening PS: Read this and understand why the website you've posted is totally wrong http://en.mediamass.net/blog/mediamass-project Gaga is also one of the most sincere artists I know. And your point is? A Star is Born ⭐ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PopBitch 1,218 Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 This will bomb harder than Tidal. Nothing can bomb more than Tidal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonsterOfSpain 8,281 Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 Why are you all so bitter over this? It's just for fun and it'll help her gain royalties to spend on music videos for the next era I kinda wish I had a dog though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mitch XCX 1,026 Posted May 29, 2015 Share Posted May 29, 2015 That's not what you said, you said it would damage her career by giving her a "childish image". That statement simply makes no sense, since pampering pets appeals to primarily adults. Ah, I just figured out why this is such a big deal here. This project, for the most part, doesn't really appeal to high school and college aged boys, living in their mommies house or in a dorm or apartment around campus. most people on this forum are that so why are you here if you don't like it....****ing weirdo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.