ARTPOPchamp 292 Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 Don't overreact. I've seen many Gaga fans on this site slamming Kim, so I just wanted to remind that our favourite pop star is doing the same thing. I think the same thing could happen to Gaga. Why can't I drag Gaga into this if this is the site dedicated to Gaga? And she's related to this subject too. Kim is not the first and not the last wearing fur, so why do we blame only her? She's just one of so many. She's neither better nor worse than Gaga. They are equal in this regard. That's all. The reason we dislike Kim so much is because she's shallow, vain and has no discernible talent. She is famous for nothing, the media is so obsessed with her for no real reason, she doesnt offer anything to the arts or the world other than vain pictures of herself and her husband, who is equally as dreadful. She makes everyone struggling to have their talent seen by the world but going no where look bad, she has no idea what the struggle is to achieve what she has, what she so clearly isn't grateful for. I repeat, she's shallow, vain, has no substance and offers nothing to the world, she is what's wrong with society and the world in general. Being beautiful, or what people consider to be beautiful, is not a talent. Sorry but it just isn't. How about Kim goes back to school, gets a degree and actually contributes something to the world? How about that? People like her and her family make my blood boil. Nothing in this world that pi**es me off more than people who get recognition for nothing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yanko 9,860 Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 Queen by who's definition?http://time.com/3822676/kim-kardashian-west-2015-time-100/TITAN Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yanko 9,860 Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 The reason we dislike Kim so much is because she's shallow, vain and has no discernible talent. She is famous for nothing, the media is so obsessed with her for no real reason, she doesnt offer anything to the arts or the world other than vain pictures of herself and her husband, who is equally as dreadful. She makes everyone struggling to have their talent seen by the world but going no where look bad, she has no idea what the struggle is to achieve what she has, what she so clearly isn't grateful for. I repeat, she's shallow, vain, has no substance and offers nothing to the world, she is what's wrong with society and the world in general. what do YOU offer to the world? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alien Tulip 12,428 Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 On Topic: I hate how she didn't even react. It's like she's being controlled and doesn't want to show any sign of emotion besides the smile she puts on every time she signs a book. Be a human Kimberly. She's more than just a star for the masses, isn't she? I get that she's trying to maintain a level of professionalism but c'mon... You sound like her mom lol. I don't care for the kardashians but I think she handled it very well. The activists look kind of stupid in my opinion. It's good that she pays no mind to them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luiz 4,253 Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 well at least she gets her fans to read a book I disapprove of what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yanko 9,860 Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 well at least she gets her fans to read a book its just a bunch of pictures Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alien Tulip 12,428 Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 I will never understand how anyone here has so much animosity towards a celebrity that isn't gaga lol. It makes me think this site is mostly filled with brainwashed robotic sheep. It's like you guys are programmed to think that way. I sometimes feel like I'm in a factory in area 51 lol. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bear 7,515 Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 Activism isn't shoving a scrumped up poster in someone's face and shouting at them. That isn't exactly going to incite change or promote a change of opinion.Besides, Kim is allowed her own view which is just as valid, and they have no right going to her event trying to force their opinion down her throat. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RebeldeFaith 5,495 Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 When I become famous I will wear human skin coats. Can I vanish into a cheeseburger pizza? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 106,103 Posted May 7, 2015 Author Share Posted May 7, 2015 The reason we dislike Kim so much is because she's shallow, vain and has no discernible talent. She is famous for nothing, the media is so obsessed with her for no real reason, she doesnt offer anything to the arts or the world other than vain pictures of herself and her husband, who is equally as dreadful. She makes everyone struggling to have their talent seen by the world but going no where look bad, she has no idea what the struggle is to achieve what she has, what she so clearly isn't grateful for. I repeat, she's shallow, vain, has no substance and offers nothing to the world, she is what's wrong with society and the world in general. Being beautiful, or what people consider to be beautiful, is not a talent. Sorry but it just isn't. How about Kim goes back to school, gets a degree and actually contributes something to the world? How about that? People like her and her family make my blood boil. Nothing in this world that pi**es me off more than people who get recognition for nothing. You can dislike her all you want for being vain, etc. but Kim has never claimed to contribute anything to the art world or to society. She is a BUSINESSWOMAN. Her job is to make money and she has created a brand out of her last name. She used a s-x tape to start most of her image, but can you blame her? What would you have done in her position? The Kardshians are smart business people no matter how you look at it. Yes, they might be what is wrong with society but you can't blame them for making money off of idiots. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Navy 495 Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 There's nothing wrong with having that opinion. I mean it is disgusting wearing real animal fur tbh, you can express your opinion in other ways though without crashing her ****ing book signing. I'm not even big on Kim, but how rude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
doveve 526 Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 Your intentions were clear. "Lemme drag Gaga even tho this topic didn't include her but because poor little Kimberly is under attack, I gotta come for Gaga". It's really low and desperate. Just because people slam Kim (and maybe she deserves it), you just HAD to slam Gaga too? This site may be dedicated to her but this topic isn't. It's dedicated to Kim. People can slam Kim as much as they want to. I don't care, BUT I don't wear pink glasses too. What should I do? Attack Kim for wearing fur, when Gaga does the same? If this topic was titled "Kim K is praised for her dress choice at MET Gala" or whatever and I would leave a comment how Gaga's and KIm's dresses were both beautiful, you wouldn't have any problem with it, because I was praising Gaga, but when I point out something negative about Gaga, you become angry. Why? Gaga is a human being with her flaws same as Kim and everyone else. I see no problem mentioning Gaga in this thread which is apparently dedicated to slam KIm, but overlook Gaga's fur wearing history. I'm desperate? For what? I praise and compliment Gaga everytime I think she deserves it, look at my comment history. I don't see any desperation in my comments in this thread. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 106,103 Posted May 7, 2015 Author Share Posted May 7, 2015 I see no problem mentioning Gaga in this thread which is apparently dedicated to slam KIm, but overlook Gaga's fur wearing history. Umm... actually the purpose of this thread is to share the news that Kim K's book signing was crashed. There is no ulterior motive or agenda that I have by posting this here. It certainly is NOT to "overlook Gaga's fur wearing history" because this thread has nothing to do with Gaga. I don't understand how some of you come up with motives for people making threads Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bat 6,162 Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 The dutch version of Peta has an award every year for celebs that wear fur 'Dumb furrie' (badly translate but w/e)The winner gets an invitation to a meeting with the anti-fur movements + a elaborated article on how their fur is being harvested.It has changed a lot of celebs mind on wearing fur in Holland. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vernier 3,786 Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 PETA always doing the most as usual Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.