Vermont Lawmakers Threaten To Reinstate Prohibition If Pot Isn't Legalized

[Luiz 4,253]

Vermont may well become the next state to legalize marijuana, and two state lawmakers who support legalization have a simple message for their colleagues: Give us what we want, or we'll take away your booze.

A new bill filed earlier this month by state Reps. Jean O'Sullivan and Christopher Pearson would effectively reinstate alcohol prohibition in Vermont. If passed, House Bill 502 would outlaw consumption of alcohol, with penalties mirroring those currently in place for marijuana possession. Those found with small amounts of alcohol would be subject to fines of up to $500, and anyone involved in the sale and distribution stream could face up to 30 years in prison and $1 million in penalties.

O'Sullivan herself acknowledges that even she doesn't support the substance of the bill. Rather, "the object was to basically embarrass leadership to say that we have [marijuana legalization bills] in front of us, and they're going absolutely nowhere," she told The Huffington Post.

The lawmakers hope to give momentum to legalization in Vermont by raising awareness about the broad scientific consensus that marijuana is the least dangerousrecreational d--g on the market. A study published in February found that pot had the lowest risk of mortality when compared with nine other commonly used d--gs, including alcohol and tobacco.

"We're certainly not going to ban alcohol, but when you say you'll let a d--g like that be legalized and then you have a d--g like marijuana that's far safer that's still banned, it's completely ironic," O'Sullivan said.

Another bill, H.277, sponsored by Pearson and O'Sullivan and currently in committee, proposes the legal sale and regulation of marijuana in Vermont. Senate Bill 95, which would also legalize the d--g, was introduced earlier this year in the legislature's upper chamber.

A Rand Corporation study released this year estimates that Vermonters spent between $125 to $225 million a year on marijuana in 2014. The report projects that tax revenue from a legal marijuana market in the state could amount to between $20 million and $70 million annually.

O'Sullivan notes that taxing marijuana would go a long way to bridge the state'smassive budget deficit.

"Consider it a gauntlet thrown down," O'Sullivan said of H.277. "When you're looking at a $113 million budget deficit, it looks really bloody attractive."

Beyond the financial incentives, evidence shows that there's something to the lawmakers' argument: Not a single person has ever been killed from a marijuana overdose. By contrast, around 88,000 Americans die each year due to excessive alcohol consumption, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/16/vermont-alcohol-ban-marijuana-_n_7079484.html?utm_hp_ref=politics

[Better Day 5,766]

#Blackmail

[MonsterOfSpain 8,331]

I think that I could be fine, If I could be Mary Jane Vermont tonight

[bionic 50,111]

Prohibit them both.  

[Luiz 4,253]

Prohibit them both.  

​never  

 

this wont actually get passed. its just to make a statement sort of. 

O'Sullivan herself acknowledges that even she doesn't support the substance of the bill. Rather, "the object was to basically embarrass leadership to say that we have [marijuana legalization bills] in front of us, and they're going absolutely nowhere," she told The Huffington Post.

 

[Bloody hooker 6,445]

[Redstreak 6,653]

I mean it makes sense. Alcohol is far worse and yet it's completely legal.

[HighwayGuy 1,498]

I'm totally for the legalisation of weed, it is just so backwards for it to be illegal 

Noone has ever died from weed, whereas so many has died from alcohol, so why is the one thats worse treated as something thats more acceptable?  

[Vernier 3,786]

I completely support their decision