REPORT: Obama adviser behind Hillary Clinton scandal, MORE to come

[Lion Heart 15,041]

It’s the vast left-wing conspiracy.

Obama senior adviser Valerie Jarrett leaked to the press details of Hillary Clinton’s use of a private e-mail address during her time as secretary of state, sources tell me.

But she did so through people outside the ­administration, so the story couldn’t be traced to her or the White House.

In addition, at Jarrett’s behest, the State Department was ordered to launch a series of investigations into Hillary’s conduct at Foggy Bottom, including the use of her expense account, the disbursement of funds, her contact with foreign leaders and her possible collusion with the Clinton Foundation.

Six separate probes into Hillary’s performance have been ­going on at the State Department. I’m told that the e-mail scandal was timed to come out just as Hillary was on the verge of formally announcing that she was running for president — and that there’s more to come.

Members of Bill Clinton’s camp say the former president suspects the White House is the source of the leak and is furious.

‘OBAMA AND VALERIE JARRETT WILL GO TO ANY LENGTHS TO PREVENT HILLARY FROM BECOMING PRESIDENT.’

 - Source

“My contacts and friends in newspapers and TV tell me that they’ve been contacted by the White House and offered all kinds of negative stories about us,” one of Bill’s friends quotes him as saying. “The Obamas are behind the e-mail story, and they’re spreading rumors that I’ve been with women, that Hillary promoted people at the State Department who’d done favors for our foundation, that John Kerry had to clean up diplomatic messes Hillary left behind.”

Then, according to this source, Bill added: “The Obamas are out to get us any way they can.”

The sabotage is part of an ­ongoing feud between the two Democrat powerhouses.

Last fall, during the run-up to the 2014 midterm elections, Jarrett was heard to complain bitterly that the Clintons were turning congressmen, senators, governors and grass-root party members against Obama by portraying him as an unpopular president who was an albatross around the neck of the party.

Jarrett was said to be livid that most Democrats running for election refused to be seen campaigning with the president. She blamed the Clintons for marginalizing the president and for trying to wrestle control of the Democratic Party away from Obama.

And she vowed payback.

My sources say Jarrett saw an opportunity to hit back hard when Monica Lewinsky suddenly resurfaced after years of living in obscurity. Jarrett discreetly put out word to some friendly members of the press that the White House would look with favor if they gave Monica some ink and airtime.

Ms. Jarrett promised White House favoritism for the media that granted air time to Monica Lewinsky after she decided to talk to Vanity Fair last year to “burn the beret and bury the blue dress,” according to the column.
 

Relations have gotten even frostier in the past few months.

After the Democrats took a shellacking in the midterms, the White House scheduled a meeting with Hillary Clinton. When she showed up in the Oval Office, she was greeted by three people — the president, Jarrett and Michelle Obama.

With his wife and Jarrett looking on, Obama made it clear that he intended to stay neutral in the presidential primary process — a clear signal that he wouldn’t mind if someone challenged Hillary for the nomination.

“Obama and Valerie Jarrett will go to any lengths to prevent Hillary from becoming president,” a source close to the White House told me. “They believe that Hillary, like her husband, is left of center, not a true-blue liberal.”

If she gets into the White House, they believe she will compromise with the Republicans in Congress and undo Obama’s legacy.

“With Obama’s approval,” this source continued, “Valerie has been holding secret meetings with Martin O’Malley [the former Democratic governor of Maryland] and [Massachusetts Sen.] Elizabeth Warren. She’s promised O’Malley and Warren the full support of the White House if they will challenge Hillary for the presidential nomination.”

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/mar/15/report-valerie-jarrett-orchestrated-hillary-clinto/#ixzz3UU2YwXME 
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

http://nypost.com/2015/03/14/obama-adviser-behind-leak-of-hillary-clintons-e-mail-scandal/

I wrote "report" in the title for a reason. 

Will Clinton win in 2016? Or will a Republican? Discuss. 

[bionic 50,111]

Why don't they want her for president? Because she's not liberal enough? What's wrong with using a private email?

[Morphine Prince 109,767]

Why don't they want her for president? Because she's not liberal enough? What's wrong with using a private email?

She used private email to conduct government work which was allowed AT THE TIME. Now it's not, I believe. .gov emails are archived for later access by the government so they are required to use it. When Hilary was in charge she had the option. So this scandal seems to be a scheme to hurt her campaign aspirations. 

[Lion Heart 15,041]

Why don't they want her for president? Because she's not liberal enough? What's wrong with using a private email?

​That's basically it. 

 

This article explains the implications of her using a personal  email account: http://www.haaretz.com/news/world/1.646059 (It's fairly short).

And for the record, current Secretary of State John Kerry is the first to use a government email account. 

 

[bionic 50,111]

She used private email to conduct government work which was allowed AT THE TIME. Now it's not, I believe. .gov emails are archived for later access by the government so they are required to use it. When Hilary was in charge she had the option. So this scandal seems to be a scheme to hurt her campaign aspirations. 

And this is coming FROM the Democrats? Mess

[Morphine Prince 109,767]

And this is coming FROM the Democrats? Mess

Yeah, if this is true this is one huge mess  

Plus Hillary is already criticized over the Benghazi incident and her using a private email doesn't look good. 

[Lion Heart 15,041]

She used private email to conduct government work which was allowed AT THE TIME. Now it's not, I believe. .gov emails are archived for later access by the government so they are required to use it. When Hilary was in charge she had the option. So this scandal seems to be a scheme to hurt her campaign aspirations. 

​Yep.

She was expected to announce something around April

[Luiz 4,253]

and the democratic party will become divided  

hello jeb bush  

the Bush monarchy tbh  

 

not really but.......

[bionic 50,111]

Yeah, if this is true this is one huge mess  

Plus Hillary is already criticized over the Benghazi incident and her using a private email doesn't look good. 

​Who do they suggest instead? A man? 

[ItsTommyBitch 12,640]

​Who do they suggest instead? A man? 

​Perhaps De blasio?  

 

But seriously omg, what a mess  

 

Hilary for 2016, she will NEVER lose ha will to win  

[Morphine Prince 109,767]

​Who do they suggest instead? A man? 

Well, most likely a man but the reason is probably because they don't consider her liberal enough. 

 

[Hauser 1,262]

This is such a pointless "scandal", there are more important things that democrats should be focusing on. I seriously doubt this will hurt Hillary Clinton's campaign, sure it will be used as ammunition for Republicans but with their treasonous letter to Iran this email "scandal" seems like nothing in the grand scheme of things. 

[Lion Heart 15,041]

So instead of Obama + co. helping their strongest Democratic candidate out, they throw her under the bus increasing the likelihood of a Republican President winning in 2016- WITH a Republican Congress -which increases the likelihood that the R. President will UNDO "Obama's 'legacy':- all because Clinton is not 'liberal' enough. 

 

Goodness  

 

That's assuming the report is true of course. But honestly, the more I read about it...

[Economy 52,951]

well anything to hurt her immage. She seems like a good person and intelligent... But shes still a democrat and will follow their ideals in most aspects...

 

And from an economic standpoint, 8 years of rising regulation and taxes is enough. Corporations arent moving out of the US for no reason.

 

LGBT support alone i dnt think is enough to make me support democrats as the economy influences most peoples lives more than some little technicalities.

 

Thats just my opinion though. i know 95% of people in this socialist/LGBT obsessed site will disagree with me

 

[shane_c 480]

This could help her because it helps to separate her from the Obama administration.  I dont think voters want 4 more years of Obama and his left wing ideology. She needs to seem different.