ISIS (Islamic State) Discussion Thread

[Memo 176]

Why are they instigating

this like what omg

[Morphine Prince 109,683]

Deadline in about 2 hours. 

[TheOriginalOne 11,604]

:ohno:

[RAMROD 117,114]

It is scary how they can find and kidnapped people this way.

Like, where and how did they find Japanese people anyway?

Must be tourists of neighboring countries?

Or journalist?

:eww:

[SissyFromSpace 20,884]

why...

[soundwave 193]

The Dr. Evil one is true, though

[Cody Draco 2,531]

I'm assuming Japan won't fund ISIS and that these two hostages are going to die.

[HANZ 4,380]

**** ISIS, ****ING SCUMS

 

LUV Japan tho

I'm assuming Japan won't fund ISIS and that these two hostages are going to die.

honestly 200 million is a lot

 

imo Japan should not give them a ****

[RAMROD 117,114]

I'm assuming Japan won't fund ISIS and that these two hostages are going to die.

pretty obvious since day one tho.

All these governments did was trying making plea for hostages to buy time.

[PdogtheDaibutsu 726]

The japanese government can't risk funding 200 million to terrorists who can use that money to buy weapons and explosives to kill more people. It's a very unfortunate tradeoff.

[HANZ 4,380]

How many people will be murdered with that $200 million dollars?

sadly true

 

Japan should not give these ****ers more power tbh

[SissyFromSpace 20,884]

I do feel bad for them but there's videos of the two men trespassing the area's that got them into ISIS zone. They were aware of the consequences and what they were doing, the risks being took, and still invaded the forbidden area.

what i was talking about:

(video)

http://www.wsj.com/video/japanese-isis-hostages-kept-video-journals-prior-to-capture/AD3AF7D5-22EC-433B-8650-9C2D707B7B47.html

[touchmetouchme 0]

:wtf:

[Hellspont 1,468]

If you have to sacrifice two men to save possibly hundreds and thousands, do it. 

[Tommymonster44 0]

Okay but what's the point of the US reducing our nuclear weapons reserve? We are still by faaarrrr the world's largest and most funded military in the world. What is the difference between 200 nuclear warheads and 100? If a single one of them is fired, the world would plunge into nuclear chaos either way.

The only reason the US retains nuclear weapon is in the case that we are attacked by another country with nuclear weapons as well. In such a situation, it is the job of our nuclear weaponry to flatten the attacking country before they flatten us. If you don't want you country flattened, don't attack the US with a nuclear bomb. It's that simple. I fail to see how the US having nuclear capability is a threat to any country not making a threat against the US. We don't plan to use them anytime soon unless necessary .

This. Nuclear disarming would make the world even more dangerous because it would mean that the first crazy country to break a treaty and launch nuclear weapon's would have total control over the entire world. As it stands, countries all over the world have nuclear weapons, which controls all countries from misusing them through the threat of retaliation.