jojo Freud 653 Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 I see why it was band, even I felt uncomfortable Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SychosSoChic 9,995 Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 That was something I expected Men.com to advertise The only thing it was missing was that Johnny Rapid guy Life ain't Hollywood for any one of us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
What 4 Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 tbh if it was a straight couple it would probably also be banned Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenniferella 2,775 Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 Totally understandable. This ad has nothing to do on TV "I have been writing LG5 since I was 13" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bye 3,947 Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 Looks like a prologue to a ****o so I agree with Time Warner Cable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyQueen 2,409 Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 tbh if it was a straight couple it would probably also be banned Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blank Space 0 Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 :heat: my body is ready, I can be Swine for them Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bt1 5,213 Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 For comparison, here is a s-xual ad featuring women from the Super Bowl: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xktClf_d188 Here's another one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AdViveJYD0 where are the pigs the masks the give receive? I am a gay man, but I dont see nothing wrong with the ad beeing banned. There are true cases of homophobia. I saw some with the SuperBowl, but this isnt the case. Btw, in this world there are straight ads banned. Look at them. Some there arent half as nasty as this gay ad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrewStevens 5,249 Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 It screams "ban me" tbh. Carl's Jr ads are s-xual too but this commercial is just too much. Half naked guys, the balls, the blow job scene, the pigs, etc. I think commercials are ok until they add s-x (the act). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMROD 117,520 Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 I guess the priblem is, that was too raunchy. There are many commercials potraying straights that also banned too because they're too raunchy or inappropriate. (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ✧*:･ﾟ ˢᵖᵉᵉᵈ ᵃⁿᵈ ʷᵉⁱᵍʰᵗ (*´艸｀*) ♡♡♡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squidward T 2,470 Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 Lol what about all those ky jelly commercials thay air. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gagaisitalian 3,573 Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 That was just a nasty commercial all together. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willy Wonka 4 Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 i really didn't think it was that bad Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesse Pinkman 4,660 Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 Um that commercial is very s-xual and tacky so I understand completely why it was banned. :awkney: It's science, bitch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HANZ 4,380 Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 this is so tacky of course it was going to be removed, this is almost **** for TV My Favs = Lady Gaga, Janet Jackson, Ricky Martin, AKB48 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.