MahoganySnitch 67 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 A new bill called the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) has passed through the Michigan House of Representatives, prohibiting the government from intervening if health care workers, such as EMTs and pharmacists, and other businesspeople refuse service on the grounds of protecting personal religious beliefs. Though the bill has yet to make its way to the state Senate, its 59-50 passage in the House has already caused controversy, particularly among opponents who claim the bill is merely a veiled attempt at legalizing discrimination. Supporters, meanwhile, point to a waning set of religious freedoms in public life as the cause for the bill. People of specific religious backgrounds shouldn’t have to practice their beliefs solely in private, some have asserted. Michigan’s RFRA is modeled after a federal law, which the Supreme Court has ruled does not apply to states. Under both forms of the law, an individual’s claim would have to pass a two-part balancing test in order to meet the legal standards. First, the individual would have to prove the request violated his or her sincerely held religious beliefs, and the government would then have to prove the law achieved its policy goal through the least restrictive means possible. While the proponents of the bill cite less-offensive cases, such as Jewish butchers refusing to handle non-kosher meat or Christian pastors prohibited from donating to local homeless populations due to food safety rules, others point to subtler  and more dangerous  possible uses. These include pharmacists refusing to fill HIV prescriptions, or EMTs denying a gay person the right to live, said an ACLU of Michigan attorney to MLive.... SOURCE: http://www.medicaldaily.com/michigan-house-passes-bill-allowing-health-care-discrimination-against-lgbt-grounds-313518 Who were the advisers that thought this was a good idea? My 2 cents: There's no way this will become state law. If Brewer vetoed the Arizona bill, this too will fall. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,645 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Great Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighwayGuy 1,498 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 I thought treating everyone equally was the general principle especially in something like healthcare??? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FATCAT 60,886 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Legalizing discrimination one minority at a time. This kitten over here (meow) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MahoganySnitch 67 Posted December 9, 2014 Author Share Posted December 9, 2014 I thought treating everyone equally was the general principle especially in something like healthcare??? An EMT on reddit did speak on this, and said EMTs are supposed to treat everyone and do so equally, including people like child molesters. I'm not in the field, but I'm fairly certain you're obligated to treat anyone that needs it as an EMT, regardless of who they are or who they're affiliated with. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
socotra 3,357 Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 ew michigan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.