2NE1LG 193 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 these petty, lazy, messy, weak ass comparisons Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blacklistedd 599 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 I love how we pretend Gaga invented opening your legs, seriously GagaDaily, seriously I love how users like you only come out of the woodwork on here to talk ****. Anyway, considering how much Azealia went on a trash-gaga binge after not being included on ARTPOP and Gaga saying she had a bad attitude, I highly doubt she would pay her any sort of homage that wasn't a diss. Whats clear is that she liked Gaga quite a bit beforehand and im sure she still does but talks **** because thats just how she behaves. She was personally offended by Gagas comment and lashed out at her. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blacklistedd 599 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 really? that pose is now trademarked by gaga? not to mention the poses aren't even the same this is exhausting the same thing that's been done to gaga for years is now being done to azealia and some fans are relishing it how sad No one is saying its trademarked by Lady Gaga. Azealia references artists in her videos, the entire 1991 video was a direct take of Crystal Waters. And obviously the video makes 90s icon references (Kim, Left Eye). I definitely don't think its some sort of homage to Lady Gaga. But I think its exhausting that people have to comment on here and act like anyones saying she ripped Gaga off. Someone is saying shes referencing her, which if she was would have been a compliment. But why do people have to immediately roll their eyes and lash out at anyone that thinks someone could possibly reference Gaga because "why would they". Clearly Azealia isn't, but honestly why shouldn't she? Why is someone mistakenly thinking that she is so exhausting? I mean at this point in time I think its more obnoxious to feel the need to fight the notion that someone would reference Gaga than it is for some random pop stan to try and make a connection because pop stans do lame **** like that all the time. Why do people have to get so rude when it comes to Lady Gaga. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benji 20,113 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 I love how users like you only come out of the woodwork on here to talk ****. Anyway, considering how much Azealia went on a trash-gaga binge after not being included on ARTPOP and Gaga saying she had a bad attitude, I highly doubt she would pay her any sort of homage that wasn't a diss. Whats clear is that she liked Gaga quite a bit beforehand and im sure she still does but talks **** because thats just how she behaves. She was personally offended by Gagas comment and lashed out at her. Excuse me? The only time I ever see you here is when you're swooping into my notifications like some sort of attention vulture trying to ignite an argument so I really wouldn't try it If you spent less time trying to find comments that contradict your thoughts to start something, you might be able to see that "users like me" actually say a lot of positive things. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blacklistedd 599 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 Excuse me? The only time I ever see you here is when you're swooping into my notifications like some sort of attention vulture trying to ignite an argument so I really wouldn't try it If you spent less time trying to find comments that contradict your thoughts to start something, you might be able to see that "users like me" actually say a lot of positive things. The only reason people on this forum think I spend my time here trying to ignite arguments is because I don't adhere to the obnoxious and lame pop forum etiquette. I genuinely come on here to talk about Lady Gaga and opinions regarding her existence in popular culture. I think the only time I come off igniting an argument is when I call out those who act like they're so above the delusional parts of this fanbase when they're on the same level just at the other end of the spectrum. We're all on a forum devoted to Lady Gaga, we're all licking her ass. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benji 20,113 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 The only reason people on this forum think I spend my time here trying to ignite arguments is because I don't adhere to the obnoxious and lame pop forum etiquette. I genuinely come on here to talk about Lady Gaga and opinions regarding her existence in popular culture. I think the only time I come off igniting an argument is when I call out those who act like they're so above the delusional parts of this fanbase when they're on the same level just at the other end of the spectrum. We're all on a forum devoted to Lady Gaga, we're all licking her ass. So you "don't adhere to the obnoxious and lame pop forum etiquette" but you obnoxiously quote people with your random assumptions of them? If you ask me, that's a lot more lame than just having a few manners when beginning a conversation with someone. You're saying some of us act above others yet you're probably one of the most condescending members here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blacklistedd 599 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 So you "don't adhere to the obnoxious and lame pop forum etiquette" but you obnoxiously quote people with your random assumptions of them? If you ask me, that's a lot more lame than just having a few manners when beginning a conversation with someone. You're saying some of us act above others yet you're probably one of the most condescending members here. I was specific, condescension and argument is welcome on my end generally. What ive always hated are members of a Lady Gaga forum that seem to have created a niche on the forum putting down whatever they deem delusional gaga fan behavior. Theres a breed of gaga fan that rebels against the notion that gaga fans are like delusional and one-track minded towards her and therefore overcompensate in a lot of ways whether it be to be overly negative about her, transfer their delusion to another pop artist and proceed to exaggeratedly praise and defend them using gaga fan behavior as some sort of catalyst to start an argument, or to immediately put down something like the subject of this thread which was that someone thought Azealia couldve referenced Lady Gaga. I mean obviously she didn't, but why do people have to get so arrogant about the fact that she didn't? And start talking **** to fans for being in other words "stupid" enough to think she or anyone would pay homage to her? Its a reach to say that she did and its not like that should go unnoted but its like ****. And I don't adhere to the typical pop forum etiquette. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koreku 2,387 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 I did noticed it myself upon watching the music video. You don't deserve a point of view if the only thing you see is you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benji 20,113 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 I was specific, condescension and argument is welcome on my end generally. What ive always hated are members of a Lady Gaga forum that seem to have created a niche on the forum putting down whatever they deem delusional gaga fan behavior. Theres a breed of gaga fan that rebels against the notion that gaga fans are like delusional and one-track minded towards her and therefore overcompensate in a lot of ways whether it be to be overly negative about her or to immediately put down something like the subject of this thread which was that someone thought Azealia couldve referenced Lady Gaga. I mean obviously she didn't, but why do people have to get so arrogant about the fact that she didn't? And start talking **** to fans for being in other words "stupid" enough to think she or anyone would pay homage to her? Its a reach to say that she did and its not like that should go unnoted but its like ****. So you're happy to be openly rude but others can't have an opinion on something Gaga related that goes against a majority? Like I said, you clearly don't look around hard enough to really have a good idea of what you're accusing others of as I know for a fact my posts are regularly balanced. Then again, there are quite a few members like you who feast off finding something and trying to make it into something bigger than it needs to be when the comment was clearly made differently to how you have personally taken it. I don't understand how dismissing the opinion that Azealia referenced Gaga in a light hearted matter REALLY bothers you this much but then it certainly seems like the problem lies with you and your view on the forum over the comment actually being a problem. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blacklistedd 599 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 So you're happy to be openly rude but others can't have an opinion on something Gaga related that goes against a majority? Like I said, you clearly don't look around hard enough to really have a good idea of what you're accusing others of as I know for a fact my posts are regularly balanced. Then again, there are quite a few members like you who feast off finding something and trying to make it into something bigger than it needs to be when the comment was clearly made differently to how you have personally taken it. I don't understand how dismissing the opinion that Azealia referenced Gaga in a light hearted matter REALLY bothers you this much but then it certainly seems like the problem lies with you and your view on the forum over the comment actually being a problem. This is what irritates me, im talking in reference towards a specific type of condescension that exists on this forum and you immediately take it to me being opposed to someone supposedly "going against the grain" with some negativity and thats not it at all. It has nothing to do with people being opposed to the positive majority as I often am. And either way this conversation will go on circles because the type of user im referring to never admits to being that type of user because why would they. They possibly don't even realize it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonna Lee 384 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 nnnn SHOOTING up the discussion charts like 1989 i like it when u treat me mean it turns my mood from black to blue Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willy Wonka 4 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 No one is saying its trademarked by Lady Gaga. Azealia references artists in her videos, the entire 1991 video was a direct take of Crystal Waters. And obviously the video makes 90s icon references (Kim, Left Eye). I definitely don't think its some sort of homage to Lady Gaga. But I think its exhausting that people have to comment on here and act like anyones saying she ripped Gaga off. Someone is saying shes referencing her, which if she was would have been a compliment. But why do people have to immediately roll their eyes and lash out at anyone that thinks someone could possibly reference Gaga because "why would they". Clearly Azealia isn't, but honestly why shouldn't she? Why is someone mistakenly thinking that she is so exhausting? I mean at this point in time I think its more obnoxious to feel the need to fight the notion that someone would reference Gaga than it is for some random pop stan to try and make a connection because pop stans do lame **** like that all the time. Why do people have to get so rude when it comes to Lady Gaga. dude really? I don't have time to explain it to you, but there's more context that validates my statements. this is the problem when you pop out of nowhere and act like you know ****. in short, get the **** out of my notifications with your weak ass comments until you have something valid to say. and furthermore, no, it has nothing to do with gaga not being worth alluding to. I think there's plenty in gagas career that would make strong allusions in an artist's work. However, I don't believe in making assertions about allusions where the connections are weak and/or unspecific. Azealia sat in a certain way so its an allusion to Gaga? Wtf? Gaga wore a high ponytail so it must be an homage to Madonna? You're ****ting me. For her allusions, Azealia donned the aesthetics of historic female rappers but for the allusion to Gaga, she's gonna assume a pose and reference a work that Gaga didn't even create? Not only does it not match style of execution of the other allusions, it's grasping at straws. I got just as annoyed when Born This Way came out and so many reviews described each of the songs by comparing it to other songs or saying it was influenced by another song. Like ****, are we getting to the point where we try to attribute every artistic work to someone else? so bye felicia Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HausOfGuy 10 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 the first thing that came to mind while watching the video was ARTPOP, im gonna leave it at that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benji 20,113 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 This is what irritates me, im talking in reference towards a specific type of condescension that exists on this forum and you immediately take it to me being opposed to someone supposedly "going against the grain" with some negativity and thats not it at all. It has nothing to do with people being opposed to the positive majority as I often am. And either way this conversation will go on circles because the type of user im referring to never admits to being that type of user because why would they. They possibly don't even realize it. Did it ever cross your mind that you could potentially be wrong? As intelligent as your theories are on these different groups on GGD, is it a stretch of your intelligence to think that the members you're grouping are possibly individuals like yourself? Of course it's going to go in circles, like I reported, it's an off topic assumption of me and other members which hasn't got an end but "you think that, I think this" ... could you not see the end of this before you even posted your comment? If you're that bothered by my original comment, feel free to PM me or report it. We've dragged this so off topic it's just going to get us both warnings so let's steer this conversation back on track a little. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HausOfGuy 10 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 I was specific, condescension and argument is welcome on my end generally. What ive always hated are members of a Lady Gaga forum that seem to have created a niche on the forum putting down whatever they deem delusional gaga fan behavior. Theres a breed of gaga fan that rebels against the notion that gaga fans are like delusional and one-track minded towards her and therefore overcompensate in a lot of ways whether it be to be overly negative about her, transfer their delusion to another pop artist and proceed to exaggeratedly praise and defend them using gaga fan behavior as some sort of catalyst to start an argument, or to immediately put down something like the subject of this thread which was that someone thought Azealia couldve referenced Lady Gaga. I mean obviously she didn't, but why do people have to get so arrogant about the fact that she didn't? And start talking **** to fans for being in other words "stupid" enough to think she or anyone would pay homage to her? Its a reach to say that she did and its not like that should go unnoted but its like ****. And I don't adhere to the typical pop forum etiquette. i had to read your post like 3 times to understand it, but now that i finally do. i totally agree with you. makes so much sense. you took the words out of my mouth. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.