7Days 7 Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 inb4 99c   I've heard somewhere 1989 was 99c on xbox music, is this true?  yes but Billboard didn't count these, that's why HDD numbers were higher. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GagaMyBlood95 9,808 Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 yes, but I don't think it was counted towards total sales. It wasn't, after Gaga's deal Billboard banned first week album sales that are under 3.99$ to count for their chart Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TEANUS 11,181 Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 inb4 99c   I've heard somewhere 1989 was 99c on xbox music, is this true? And on a phone app..... Finally something talking about Gaga's achievement without tagging it with "only because of $0.99 deal" I wish people would stop bringing up the Amazon deal when talking about it. It's not really fair and it's still an accomplishment. THHHHHIIIIIIIIIISSSSSSSSSS she sold 1 million, it really doesn't matter how she did it. Anyone was welcome to do the exact same kinda deal. It's anyone else's fault for not doing it. :MANiCURE: British social ladies with upturned pinkies, glasses clinking // xoxoTEANUS Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheOriginalOne 8,208 Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 It wasn't, after Gaga's deal Billboard banned first week album sales that are under 3.99$ to count for their chart Well, Gaga sure is leaving her impact :Emma: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
migamiga 12,067 Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 No it actually sold a relatively small proportion of the album... What do you mean? Like Amazon only sold a couple songs? I'm pretty sure they sold 440k of the standard edition. Imagine if those weren't counted Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psychedelic 1,098 Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 Sorry, but at 99c, that ain't no 'slay' or 'yaaas' Â Congrats anyway!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donatello 112 Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 Using historic inflation calculation, $0.99 would be $1.11 in 2014 currency so  and gtfo TS stans. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emvee 7,080 Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 A record is a record.  Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheOriginalOne 8,208 Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 A record is a record.  :lmao: :lmao: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fish 6,086 Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 BTW, album of the decade. millenium**  Gaga said it herselff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valextra 58 Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 Q u e e n :legend: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiuga 1,904 Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 gaga would own the record for the fastest selling single too if Born this Way was released on a proper chart day. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mills 446 Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 440k from the 1.108M first-week sales came from Amazon's 99 cent 2-day offer. Billboard recognizes that, and they also still recognizes BTW as the 17th album in SoundScan history to sell more than a million in a week. Some tend to either forget, or worse, ignore that fact. It sold more than a million in its first week, regardless if it was offered by one retailer for 99 cents for 2 days. "Sold" implies that there's an intent to purchase from the consumers. It wasn't offered for "free", for its sales to not be counted. Not to mention, SoundScan / Billboard didn't have any policy regarding first-week sales discounts back then.  To prevent future releases to use the type of sales promo Amazon did for BTW in pursuit of manipulating the charts, a pricing policy was introduced, after BTW's release. That pricing policy disallows any album priced below $3.49 during their first 4 weeks of availability to be counted by SoundScan, and therefore will not reflect on the Billboard charts. That's what happened to Microsoft's 99-cent offer for Taylor's 1989. Its sales were NOT counted by SoundScan, and are excluded from 1989's 1.287M US debut.  However, that policy does NOT alter or affect BTW's first week sales. Hence, the all-time record of the biggest one-week US digital album sales still stands and belongs to BTW. Only the ignorant and the misinformed would refute that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty 87 Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 A record is a record.   Tell em! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wet Fire 5,687 Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 Queen :legend: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.