Jay.P 2,331 Posted November 3, 2014 Share Posted November 3, 2014 Why? Do you hear that? It's poison. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
disneyhigh 43 Posted November 3, 2014 Share Posted November 3, 2014 So pathetic and it's all about money, the greedy b itch is worth millions seriously why is she hankering so much for more she's had so many sales. the people who now can't stream it will download it illegally because the people who stream do so as its cheaper THIS streaming is where the music industry is headed. i cant stand the label reps who try to milk artists like Beyonce (still not spotify) adele, Rihanna. ****ing greedy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHANTEL 2 Posted November 3, 2014 Share Posted November 3, 2014 People saying the labels are milking but sis IT IS ThEIR right to do so. They OWN the songs and artists deserve more then being streamed especially when it brigs then nearly nothing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gagaslaysw 0 Posted November 3, 2014 Share Posted November 3, 2014 LMAO Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin Monk 0 Posted November 3, 2014 Share Posted November 3, 2014 What the **** is your problem? Greedy? She wrote every ****ing song herself, she can do whtever she wants with it. YOU'RE NOT ENTITLED TO ANYTHING, IT ISN'T YOUR PROPERTY. Want to listen to her music? Buy it. BYE My problem is that spotify still pays her she is GREEDY because she wants MORE I agree that she deserves money for he efforts which she will get a shed load of either way so why not just let us PREMIUM spotify users who do PAY listen to it swell as those who have a money to burn through iTunes. Btw your attitude is repugnant. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 680 Posted November 3, 2014 Share Posted November 3, 2014 My problem is that spotify still pays her she is GREEDY because she wants MORE More accurately, she doesn't want LESS as a result of Spotify. She's trying to preserve her business model. If you want it free, go to files tube or bit torrent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hello Mr. Radio 45 Posted November 3, 2014 Share Posted November 3, 2014 My problem is that spotify still pays her she is GREEDY because she wants MORE I agree that she deserves money for he efforts which she will get a shed load of either way so why not just let us PREMIUM spotify users who do PAY listen to it swell as those who have a money to burn through iTunes. Btw your attitude is repugnant. My attitude is repugnant, says the one who used s-xist derogatory terms to refer to a successful woman who's trying to make smart business decisions just because YOU think you should be entitled to something that isn't even yours to begin with. Guess what? It doesn't matter what you pay Spotify. THEY DON'T OWN HER MUSIC EITHER. You should be ashamed of what you wrote. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psychedelic 1,098 Posted November 3, 2014 Share Posted November 3, 2014 That's sort of pushy :witchney: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sebastien 16 Posted November 3, 2014 Share Posted November 3, 2014 I was only seeing good things about Taylor all week. Then some pages posted this on Facebook and she was getting so much hate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted November 3, 2014 Share Posted November 3, 2014 Smart! Taylor's label did the same thing with Red. Same thing Beyoncé did for a while. We all know how the sales of these two albums turned out the first couple of weeks of release. :) They will put the music on Spotify in a few weeks, just like they did last time. It's a business model they follow and it does seem to work for certain artist. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
migamiga 12,101 Posted November 3, 2014 Share Posted November 3, 2014 Maybe it's cause I don't use spotify that I don't find an issue with this. I mean I can see how people think it's a greedy move, but record sales have plummeted so much this year and finally Taylor comes out with an album people are gonna buy- of course they're gonna milk it as much as possible. Although I'm all for free music, I really think it'd be cool if people bought music again. Albums are such a lost art. But if people really want it for free, they'll find a way. If she's willing to sacrifice streaming points for it then I don't see it as a selfish move. I see it as a progressive way to start moving albums again Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
superman 32 Posted November 3, 2014 Share Posted November 3, 2014 watch all those on the taylor bandwagon eat their words of calling her a revolutionary or similar stuff when she puts everything back on sportify when she realises she cant hit another hot 100 number one without streaming nowadays. You guys don't realise that most probably Taylor didn't even have a say in this as Billboard reported that its her label wanting to increase their worth because they are on sale and characterized this move as not smart :) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pop 4,541 Posted November 3, 2014 Share Posted November 3, 2014 1989 is a industry changer. Everyone thought album sales are dead and were flocking to Spotify. However, Taylor proved that with the power of good music, cute packaging and big promo music can still sell as well as it did in the golden age of pop. The Taylor Brigade: KNOCKOUT Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redstreak 6,653 Posted November 3, 2014 Share Posted November 3, 2014 THIS streaming is where the music industry is headed. i cant stand the label reps who try to milk artists like Beyonce (still not spotify) adele, Rihanna. ****ing greedy But it's not greedy to think that we as the consumer should just get the results of everyone's hard work for free? Take a moment to think of just flexibility, love, and trust~ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bowie 4 Posted November 3, 2014 Share Posted November 3, 2014 I feel like this is a very bad move. For people who can't afford to buy albums and wanted to listen to Taylor's music, they're now shut out from doing so. Moreover, Taylor's position on the charts, especially in the UK, has been greatly helped by streaming. It'll be interesting to see what happens now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.