Jump to content

Cheek to Cheek review database + Metacritic thread


MonsterMum

Featured Posts

  • Replies 209
  • Created
  • Last Reply

fuu that idiotic site

when the gp loves it, their useless pathetic opinions can suck my big fat a$$

just ignore those biased ****tards  :kissga:

Link to post
Share on other sites

GoldenNovember

Why do people even care? If you like the music, everything else shouldn't even matter.

It's hard to light a candle, easy to curse the dark instead.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Redstreak

I knew metacritic would jump on this one negative review when there are dozens of 80's out there that haven't been counted yet.

They're picking all of the random negative reviews. Any and all of them have been counted.

Unfortunately most of the 80's we've seen aren't from publications that get accepted to Metacritic :(

 

These are the only ones that count:

 

http://www.metacritic.com/faq#item20

Take a moment to think of just flexibility, love, and trust~
Link to post
Share on other sites

Emailing them about it isn't gonna do ****. It'll probably just have an opposite effect.

This. Metacritic already started shading us, Gaga fans, when everyone was e-mailing them about this Slant review.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Robinladen

This. Metacritic already started shading us, Gaga fans, when everyone was e-mailing them about this Slant review.

what did they say? :toofunny:

Link to post
Share on other sites

what did they say? :toofunny:

I don't know exactly but two of my twitter friends said how they got quite a shady replies, like you could tell that they were laughing at us. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Psychedelic

Don't even give importance to negativity!

It's a natural thing in this universe, giving it importance is giving it power! :coffee:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Admin unpinned this topic

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...