Jump to content
Poster

Lady Gaga to endorse E-cigs in new commercial


The Professor

Featured Posts

  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Jester

Why did they put this pic in the article tho :awkney: That's just a bad dressed wax figure of her lol

 

Madame-Tussauds-ga_2926394b.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

MonsterMum

Not here for any form of tobacco to be promoted.

 

 

That´s the whole thing tho...it´s actually is not any form of tabacco ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

RAMROD

Quick question tho ... Even if we do get something, does this mean she's not gonna promote it again? She doesn't have a lot of time to promote

Well, she will be busy with tpur for this year, so not much time for promotion.

That is why she already did few tapings the other weeks, with Tony Bennett for their upcoming Jazz album.

(ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ✧*:・゚ 𝐹𝑒𝑒𝓁 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝒷𝑒𝒶𝓉 𝓊𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓇 𝓎𝑜𝓊𝓇 𝒻𝑒𝑒𝓉, 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝒻𝓁𝑜𝑜𝓇'𝓈 𝑜𝓃 𝐹𝐼𝑅𝐸!! (*´艸`*) ♡♡♡
Link to post
Share on other sites

Essence
I'd rather Gaga and others be 'smoking' these rather than ACTUAL cigarettes so I'm all for it.
Link to post
Share on other sites

ItsTommyBitch

I like them, got myself an apple one. It's a good alternative to smoking cigarettes.

Its really not :awkney: Studies being done on them are basically saying that the only noticable difference is the vapor/lack of "smoke"... You can still get lung cancer and the toxins in them affect the body in almost the same way that normal tobacco smoke does. :laughga:

 

Yeah the addiction and carcinogens other than physical smoke are all still there. E-cigarettes are a way to appease a habit, because if people can't quit we should at least let them POSSIBLY have a safer alternative. Second hand effects are inconclusive as of yet. It doesnt help you quit (despite some people actually thinking this) and an approved method of quitting is 10x more effective than an E-cigarette. Its basically for people who smoke, but... arent really planning on quitting, so want to at least possibly* be healthier over time. (I keep saying possibly because we dont know if they are better or worse or equal to cigarettes in the long run, so far the verdict is heading towards "they are just as bad! but at least they look cool!") 

 

Mess @ people thinking "at least its not tobacco" :smh:

私自身もこの世の中も誰もかれもが, どんなに華やかな人生でも, どんなに悲惨な人生でも, いつかは変貌し, 破壊され、消滅してしまう. すべてがもともとこの世に存在しない一瞬の幻想なのだから
Link to post
Share on other sites

ItsTommyBitch

Um, why?

Read my post above hun :hug:

私自身もこの世の中も誰もかれもが, どんなに華やかな人生でも, どんなに悲惨な人生でも, いつかは変貌し, 破壊され、消滅してしまう. すべてがもともとこの世に存在しない一瞬の幻想なのだから
Link to post
Share on other sites

Its really not :awkney: Studies being done on them are basically saying that the only noticable difference is the vapor/lack of "smoke"... You can still get lung cancer and the toxins in them affect the body in almost the same way that normal tobacco smoke does. :laughga:

 

Yeah the addiction and carcinogens other than physical smoke are all still there. E-cigarettes are a way to appease a habit, because if people can't quit we should at least let them POSSIBLY have a safer alternative. Second hand effects are inconclusive as of yet. It doesnt help you quit (despite some people actually thinking this) and an approved method of quitting is 10x more effective than an E-cigarette. Its basically for people who smoke, but... arent really planning on quitting, so want to at least possibly* be healthier over time. (I keep saying possibly because we dont know if they are better or worse or equal to cigarettes in the long run, so far the verdict is heading towards "they are just as bad! but at least they look cool!") 

 

Mess @ people thinking "at least its not tobacco" :smh:

The aim is not to eliminate cancer. It's to ease or appease addiction while being a bit more eco-friendly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...