AdelaAngelo 0 Posted April 24, 2014 Share Posted April 24, 2014 jfc. ok im not gonna act like gaga did anything either but dammit, none of the ppl on the list have had any ****ing influence this year. it's all about who's most popular. like benedict is only there cuz ppl like sherlock, but jeez, he's just an actor after all, he's not sherlock. im really pissed bout katy, but not surprised. the only difference is that 3 years ago, when gaga was on top, at least she wasn't buying all the radio station and stuff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lumiere 5,717 Posted April 24, 2014 Share Posted April 24, 2014 Lol Justin is influencibg the world in a bad way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muh 144 Posted April 24, 2014 Share Posted April 24, 2014 What is hapenning with the world? Katy Perry #3??? Are you serious? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aquaprincess 23 Posted April 24, 2014 Share Posted April 24, 2014 This list is hilarious for a number of reasons. But good for gaga snagging the 11th spot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luc 4,775 Posted April 24, 2014 Share Posted April 24, 2014 Most of the TIME readers are from India; perhaps Katy is bigger than Gaga in India Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mars 2,373 Posted April 24, 2014 Share Posted April 24, 2014 Katy sitting on Gags throne. Table has turned. This unfortunately Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMROD 109,618 Posted April 24, 2014 Share Posted April 24, 2014 This unfortunately Not to jinx it but watch her wins Grammy next year. (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ✧*:・゚ dancin' until i'm dead (*´艸`*) ♡♡♡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonsterOfSpain 8,318 Posted April 24, 2014 Share Posted April 24, 2014 Most of the TIME readers are from India; perhaps Katy is bigger than Gaga in India Maybe that's why the top 2 are irrelevant indians. But I don't think so because, did you see the performance Katy did there? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrawberryBlond 14,872 Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 Mess that they featured Marina Abramovic, but not Gaga, even though Gaga made her a part of her ARTPOP project and put her name out there for millions of people who had no idea who she was until then. Marina likely wouldn't have been on this list if it weren't for Gaga. Some nerve they have not to feature her. They did the right thing by not featuring Katy, Beiber or Lorde, but I can't believe they actually chose Miley. And can someone explain to me why Justin Timberlake didn't even get submitted for consideration? He was one of the biggest artists of last year who went through a very publicised comeback. And why in the name of all that is holy is Carrie Underwood on the list? She did barely nothing last year. She did a further 50 or so tour dates (that typically played to less than 10,000 people a night and only made $51 million with 114 dates) and released a single that barely scraped the Billboard top 40. I'd rather someone that had underwhelming sales or was hated last year was on the list as opposed to someone who barely did anything. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeleteMyAccount 11,881 Posted April 25, 2014 Share Posted April 25, 2014 Mess that they featured Marina Abramovic, but not Gaga, even though Gaga made her a part of her ARTPOP project and put her name out there for millions of people who had no idea who she was until then. Marina likely wouldn't have been on this list if it weren't for Gaga. Some nerve they have not to feature her. They did the right thing by not featuring Katy, Beiber or Lorde, but I can't believe they actually chose Miley. And can someone explain to me why Justin Timberlake didn't even get submitted for consideration? He was one of the biggest artists of last year who went through a very publicised comeback. And why in the name of all that is holy is Carrie Underwood on the list? She did barely nothing last year. She did a further 50 or so tour dates (that typically played to less than 10,000 people a night and only made $51 million with 114 dates) and released a single that barely scraped the Billboard top 40. I'd rather someone that had underwhelming sales or was hated last year was on the list as opposed to someone who barely did anything. Well Carrie is more than a touring artist. She's a philanthropist(Red Cross, C.A.T. Foundation) and starred in the Sound of Music that got over 20 Million views the night it aired. She had multiple gigs varying from the Rolling Stones, the Emmys, and singing the NFL Sunday Night Football theme. Also had exhibit at the Country Music Hall of Fame. Won a Grammy and a few other awards. Released a touring video that went to #1 for a few weeks. What else do you want from a person? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrawberryBlond 14,872 Posted April 26, 2014 Share Posted April 26, 2014 Well Carrie is more than a touring artist. She's a philanthropist(Red Cross, C.A.T. Foundation) and starred in the Sound of Music that got over 20 Million views the night it aired. She had multiple gigs varying from the Rolling Stones, the Emmys, and singing the NFL Sunday Night Football theme. Also had exhibit at the Country Music Hall of Fame. Won a Grammy and a few other awards. Released a touring video that went to #1 for a few weeks. What else do you want from a person? It would have made more sense if she was on the list last year, though. She was doing more stuff then and the year before. Why now after all this time is weird. You have to realise she has no presence from a worldwide perspective. When it comes to Americans featured on the list, they've got to be people everyone's heard of worldwide. It's a myth that fame in America equals universal fame - Carrie's proof that it's possible to make it in America but still be virtually unknown globally. I wish Time had a better sense of relevancy with their choices. If Carrie can make it onto the list, how come Gaga, who had a much bigger year, is nowhere to be found? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nein 508 Posted April 26, 2014 Share Posted April 26, 2014 Justin is on the list huh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeleteMyAccount 11,881 Posted April 26, 2014 Share Posted April 26, 2014 It would have made more sense if she was on the list last year, though. She was doing more stuff then and the year before. Why now after all this time is weird. You have to realise she has no presence from a worldwide perspective. When it comes to Americans featured on the list, they've got to be people everyone's heard of worldwide. It's a myth that fame in America equals universal fame - Carrie's proof that it's possible to make it in America but still be virtually unknown globally. I wish Time had a better sense of relevancy with their choices. If Carrie can make it onto the list, how come Gaga, who had a much bigger year, is nowhere to be found? There's a lot of people, if not most, that shouldn't be on the list by that option. That makes sense, but not forget that the magazine needs to sell issues to the American public that would rather see people they like than people they don't know. It's a popularity contest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.