Jump to content

General Charts Discussion - Taylor's 1989 is swiftly coming for 5M+


Mills

Featured Posts

what are your predictions?

 

:)

 

pills and potions 

 top 25 

gold in usa (i think)

85 million views

 

anaconda

#2

 

2xplatinum 

 

307 million views

 

only 

 

#27 

 

around 200k

 

15 million views 

 

shes performing at AMA and snl 

she performed at EMA 

+BANG BANG AND FLAWLESS REMIX with beyonce 

 

P.S  pink friday opened with 300k+ and rr with 200k+ 

 

i fell like 200k is guaranteed so ill go with 300k 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 15.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

70-90 if she's lucky. 

thats almost impossible cause her debut was with 300k+ and her second album did 200k+ i think and shes everywhere this year 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whispering

Wednesday 14 April 2010 :awkney:

 

Huge smashes used to have 7m sales in 2010, not 3m like in 2014... obviously they earn a **** ton more now than in 2010 from streaming :duck:

 

Not really. That's the problem

 

Aloe Blacc: Streaming Services Need to Pay Songwriters Fairly

 

http://www.wired.com/2014/11/aloe-blacc-pay-songwriters/

 

"In return for co-writing a major hit song, I’ve earned less than $4,000 domestically from the largest digital music service."

 

"Updating the nation’s antiquated music licensing system will better serve the needs of not only music creators, like me, but businesses that use our music, consumers and the global marketplace for music. But the digital music services that see a financial advantage in maintaining the status quo are fighting hard to obstruct any meaningful reform.

 

I, for one, can no longer stand on the sidelines and watch as the vast majority of songwriters are left out in the cold, while streaming company executives build their fortunes in stock options and bonuses on the back of our hard work. Songwriting is truly a labor of love, one that often does not result in wealth. But I know the work we create has real value. And I believe policymakers will one day recognize that a system that allows digital streaming services to enjoy enormous profits while music creators struggle is imbalanced and broken."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gypsy Life

Scott Borchetta, CEO of Big Machine revealed the real numbers from Spotify. Swift's record label provided new figures to defend themselves in the battle over profits from the streaming music service.

 

"Taylor Swift has been paid less than $500,000 in the past 12 months for domestic streaming of her songs", Scott Borchetta, the CEO of Taylor Swift’s record label, the independent Nashville-based Big Machine, told TIME Wednesday.

 

According to Borchetta, the actual amount his label has received in return for domestic streams of Swift’s musicâ€â€$496,044â€â€is drastically smaller than the amount Spotify has suggested the artist receives.  Borchetta said his label had made more from streaming Taylor Swift’s videos on the video site Vevo than it has from putting her music on Spotify.

A Spotify spokesperson told TIME that the total payout for Swift’s streaming over the past 12 months globally was $2 million. :awkney:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Mills locked and unpinned this topic

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...