Jump to content

General Charts Discussion - Taylor's 1989 is swiftly coming for 5M+


Mills

Featured Posts

PicklePower

http://kworbtest.dreamhosters.com/aradio/

 

There's that. 


'bout time this gets to top 75 

 

75 +4
MEGHAN TRAINOR
Lips Are Movin
26.996 +0.867

 

All stations:

 

18 =
MEGHAN TRAINOR
Lips Are Movin
5328 +42

 

Why isn't radio playing this? I don't get it

MEGHAN TRAINOR | Katy Perry | Taylor Swift | Lady Gaga | Rihanna | Ariana Grande | Beyoncé | Nicki Minaj | Sam Smith
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 15.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

she didn't have an album out the past year though. So she earned $2m (just checked, not $1.5m) just based on recurrent plays with no album out.

Like, you can't be that money hungry :awkney:

ikr :smh: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maroon 5 - Animals 0.2961

 

they are doing great this era 


David Guetta - Dangerous (feat. Sam Martin) 0.1467

this NEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDS TO SMASH !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gypsy Life

why not the more the merrier  :Jase:

We shouldn't be feeding rich people money each time they're hungry for more :Jase:

 

http://kworbtest.dreamhosters.com/aradio/

 

There's that. 

'bout time this gets to top 75 

 

75 +4

MEGHAN TRAINOR

Lips Are Movin

26.996 +0.867

 

All stations:

 

18 =

MEGHAN TRAINOR

Lips Are Movin

5328 +42

 

Why isn't radio playing this? I don't get it

She's still a new artist. Her songs will rise slowly, especially since AATB is still getting played on rotation.

 

 

David Guetta - Dangerous (feat. Sam Martin) 0.1467

this NEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDS TO SMASH !

Yes :excited2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

We shouldn't be feeding rich people money each time they're hungry for more :Jase:

 

She's still a new artist. Her songs will rise slowly, especially since AATB is still getting played on rotation.

 

 

Yes :excited2:

u take me down spin me around

 IJUST GOT THAT FEELING SUGAR uuuhhh 

 

 

1tumblr_lgp6q5NhE21qcjtu8o1_500.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not about being money hungry. It's about fairness.

I am happy Lips is doing well, the video is cute but I expected more.  Let's hope they'll put more money in DFH.

Spotify is one of the reasons Lips have a cheap video.  Less money earned = less money invested duh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gypsy Life

It's not about being money hungry. It's about fairness.

I am happy Lips is doing well, the video is cute but I expected more.  Let's hope they'll put more money in DFH.

Spotify is one of the reasons Lips have a cheap video.  Less money earned = less money invested duh.

The video was financed by HP though. Meghan & her label didn't pay one cent.

 

photo-23394.jpg?_r=1414863553

Link to post
Share on other sites

The video was financed by HP though. Meghan & her label didn't pay one cent.

 

photo-23394.jpg?_r=1414863553

it's still cheap so does it really matter ? And even worse, meaning the label not only didn't pay for a cheap video, but didn't pay at all

photo-23394.jpg?_r=1414863553

Link to post
Share on other sites

PicklePower

The video was financed by HP though. Meghan & her label didn't pay one cent.

 

photo-23394.jpg?_r=1414863553

 

It probably cost HP a lot. They had to get all of those props and hire all of those people. 

it's still cheap so does it really matter ? And even worse, meaning the label not only didn't pay for a cheap video, but didn't pay at all

photo-23394.jpg?_r=1414863553

 

Why would they pay for it if HP would?

MEGHAN TRAINOR | Katy Perry | Taylor Swift | Lady Gaga | Rihanna | Ariana Grande | Beyoncé | Nicki Minaj | Sam Smith
Link to post
Share on other sites

It probably cost HP a lot. They had to get all of those props and hire all of those people. 

 

Why would they pay for it if HP would?

Why do Lady Gaga always invest money in her videos when she also gets money from Interscope ? Well it's simple - so the video can be EVEN BETTER.

 

I like Meghan and I am annoyed that the video is cheap. It's cute but yeah..  Like it's not hard to grasp that if they did a better video it'd be having more views and more interest in Meghan and her product etc.  it's just so stupid.. One video can change a lot...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blank Space

It's not about being money hungry. It's about fairness.

I am happy Lips is doing well, the video is cute but I expected more.  Let's hope they'll put more money in DFH.

Spotify is one of the reasons Lips have a cheap video.  Less money earned = less money invested duh.

Yet she got 20million deal with HP, :spin: yeah trully talking about Taylor being money hungry yet Meghan new star gettin 20m deal for her first songs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gypsy Life

Yet she got 20million deal with HP, :spin: yeah trully talking about Taylor being money hungry yet Meghan new star gettin 20m deal for her first songs.

Angela Cheng teas. 20M is the cost of HP's holiday campaign, which means they're spent to promote HP not Meghan, but it just happens to include LAM on the commercial.

 

photo-23394.jpg?_r=1414863553

Link to post
Share on other sites

PicklePower

Why do Lady Gaga always invest money in her videos when she also gets money from Interscope ? Well it's simple - so the video can be EVEN BETTER.

 

I like Meghan and I am annoyed that the video is cheap. It's cute but yeah..  Like it's not hard to grasp that if they did a better video it'd be having more views and more interest in Meghan and her product etc.  it's just so stupid.. One video can change a lot...

 

AATB got a ton of views and it's simple. LAM is already past 4,000,000.

MEGHAN TRAINOR | Katy Perry | Taylor Swift | Lady Gaga | Rihanna | Ariana Grande | Beyoncé | Nicki Minaj | Sam Smith
Link to post
Share on other sites

Whispering

she didn't have an album out the past year though. So she earned $2m (just checked, not $1.5m) just based on recurrent plays with no album out.

Like, you can't be that money hungry :awkney:

 

Scott Borchetta, CEO of Big Machine revealed the real numbers from Spotify. Swift's record label provided new figures to defend themselves in the battle over profits from the streaming music service.

 

"Taylor Swift has been paid less than $500,000 in the past 12 months for domestic streaming of her songs", Scott Borchetta, the CEO of Taylor Swift’s record label, the independent Nashville-based Big Machine, told TIME Wednesday.

 

According to Borchetta, the actual amount his label has received in return for domestic streams of Swift’s musicâ€â€$496,044â€â€is drastically smaller than the amount Spotify has suggested the artist receives.  Borchetta said his label had made more from streaming Taylor Swift’s videos on the video site Vevo than it has from putting her music on Spotify.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Mills locked and unpinned this topic

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...