Emvee 7,086 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 Who wouldn't take that money though Be honest, please. I understand their position completely. but you're quick to question gaga's artistic integrity. i see you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
monketsharona 44,735 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 And what's this about Zedd saying "there's a problem?" Maybe a problem because Infested Mushroom wanted to use this song and Gaga wanted it on her album... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mostro 0 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 Eh, whatever. We have Aura. They have royalties. They are dismissed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinosky 1,912 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 Father, Son, and House of Cucci Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didymus 32,781 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 (edited) Well, I was already pissed off months ago that she just paid for an instrumental instead of writing it but you're quick to question gaga's artistic integrity. i see you. Edited October 5, 2013 by Didymus Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeStonem 269 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 God, they are so pretentious. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emvee 7,086 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 Maybe a problem because Infested Mushroom wanted to use this song and Gaga wanted it on her album... How is that a problem? If IM really wanted this song for themselves, they wouldn't have sold it. If the song was never even an option, why would Zedd play it for her? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo 3,980 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 Now watch them put out a press release saying this was all fabricated by the interviewer. Which, unless there's a recording, may even be true. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Design 860 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 Lady Gaga - annoying alternative bands since 2008 Apple for me, apple for you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
monketsharona 44,735 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 How is that a problem? If IM really wanted this song for themselves, they wouldn't have sold it. If the song was never even an option, why would Zedd play it for her? Whatever I don't think Zedd ever shaded Gaga... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
soundwave 193 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 DJWS should reinvent the song and make it a last minute addition like HML Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tezbear91 737 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 Wow how snobby can a dj be? Get over yourself! Love Aura though so fair play to them for making it lol battle for your life. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pure Adrenaline 1,518 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 lol they think of Gaga as cheap and too commercial.... I wonder what they will say about Katy It's much more fun to have hizophrenia... u never get lonely Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emvee 7,086 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 Well, I was already pissed off months ago that she just paid for an instrumental instead of writing it Gaga doesn't write her instrumentals, she writes her melodies. And to my initial disappointment, she didn't even use most of the original instrumental. She sampled parts of it for the verses. You know sampling, right? That thing that is often done to make contemporary pop songs? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
arcticmonkey 0 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 Is that even true? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trending Now
New Threads
Trending Now
New Threads
Featured Posts