killed btch 0 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 Agreed. It wouldn't make sense that she would start revealing the cover now when it's supposed to be Monday. Especially when this would reveal the main part of the cover. please god, let this be true! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galactic Mess 1,393 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 Guys this is not the cover, it's just "The Birth Of Venus" used as an illustration for it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshMonster 12 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 Has anyone noticed the piece of work by Jeff Koons called "Metallic Venus"- https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=jeff+koons+metallic+venus&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&client=safari#biv=i%7C0%3Bd%7CnYK4AA_Vd5BcxM%3A Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HausOfGuy 10 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 wow, just when i thought gagadaily had gone as low as it could go, this ****ing ridiculus comment was made you haven't even seen the whole cover yet honey when i made this comment everyone still though the cover was the birth of venus painting... u know whats even more ridiculous? you quoting my old comment tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
killed btch 0 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 omg if this background of the birth of venus is the cover I can't even.... so basic... where's the technology reference? i predict a mess (hoping to be proved wrong) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wet Fire 7,448 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 She is prob. holding the ball in her hand/s. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy 5 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 This seems accurate minus the color being dulled down Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xianfan95 0 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 Not here for her body being superimposed onto Venus' figure on a Broticelli painting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
melodichard 3,769 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 Inb4 Azealia clocks her again for ripping her off That's Azealia's cover? Lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
killed btch 0 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 inspired or REPRODUCED? damn gaga...I was hoping for a tottaly HIGH-TECH cover goddamn Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrozenKookie 2,638 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 This is what Coldplays cover for Viva La Vida was: Nothing wrong with using old paintings for an album cover. But I'm not sure how copyright works exactly. Maybe they have to make some kind of deal with the museum who owns the original piece? One of the most iconic covers I've ever seen and one of the best albums ever they did that cover in months but it was all worth it. The cover perfectly embodied the whole theme and tracks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hydrangea 6,208 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 I have a Theory that the Bits to be revealed first will be the parts covered by the birth of venus painting? Idk like maybe she put that in to screw with us and the whole album cover is underneath the white and the painting and the bits of painting will reveal the background and bits of text then the white parts will reveal like the main core of the image? I dunno just a theory Put your paws all over me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lavender Pubes 0 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 Wouldn't that be like plagiarism or something anyway? Hasn't the copyright for the painting expired? I'm unsure how that works, I've seen the painting used in other forms on new entertainment. This is what Coldplays cover for Viva La Vida was: Nothing wrong with using old paintings for an album cover. But I'm not sure how copyright works exactly. Maybe they have to make some kind of deal with the museum who owns the original piece? I googled it and it seems like the painting is now in the public domain since it's from the 1500's. That's correct, I've studied a bit of intellectual property law... copyright has a limited lifespan It varies from country to country, and depending on the type of work it is... but on average its for around 50 years. So a painting from the 16th century definitely would be in the public domain Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriverMonster 10 Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 I'm not feeling a painting as an album cover. This has been done so many times Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Kunst 0 Posted October 6, 2013 Share Posted October 6, 2013 The painting is probably in the public domain, but individual photographs of it can still be copyright. The cover was worked on by Jeff Koons- its not just Gaga's head photoshopped onto the Boticelli Venus. People need to stop worrying about that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.