Gaga needs to show support for Palestine

[Forest 32]

3 minutes ago, ANVEEROY said:

Hmm, this time I don't disagree with you. If she keeps staying like this, I might need to distance myself as well, which will be very hard to do, but ethically, I need to. 

Leave it to the LGBTQ community to shun away an actual ally because she doesn’t prioritize homophobic people on the other side of the world.

 

Anyway, Gaga will likely never speak on the subject. Like I said, Gaga now has a half-Jewish child and her safety and well-being should be her priority.

[lastpopicon 37,509]

This topic took a big turn very quickly 

@Controversiaga you really live up to your name girl 

[Purrrrrr 18,488]

1 minute ago, Forest said:

Leave it to the LGBTQ community to shun away an actual ally because she doesn’t prioritize homophobic people on the other side of the world.

 

Anyway, Gaga will likely never speak on the subject. Like I said, Gaga now has a half-Jewish child and her safety and well-being should be her priority.

why is someone that joined 33 mins ago just to be a troll allowed to post already lmfao

[Forest 32]

9 minutes ago, Purrrrrr said:

because you're talking **** 

Gaga now has a half-Jewish child. Do you seriously think she’s not concerned about all the anti-Semitism going on in America and how her speaking up on situation in Gaza subject could affect her baby’s safety?

Edited 19 hours ago by Forest

[Purrrrrr 18,488]

lemme just delete actually*

Edited 19 hours ago by Purrrrrr

[mlmc1995 365]

I agree that she does, and I wish that she had done already, but I also think this is a point where she likely isn’t going to due to her new arrival and the way she’s having to navigate the media. I’m not saying that’s an excuse, more that I don’t think we’ll hear from her on anything at all for a while. Saying anything at all just stirs up even more interest in her, which she doesn’t want right now.

(Also tbh she’s probably pre-occupied with her newborn sharting up her entire back and needing to change every piece of clothing.)

Edited 19 hours ago by mlmc1995

[Cameron Dallas 26]

Not choosing sides but we aren’t in control of her. She doesn’t need to do anything. Leave her alone lol

[Concertaholic 6,667]

That would actually be wholly unnecessary for her to do at this point. Not everyone has to be political at all times. The Israel-Palestine conflict shouldn’t be some litmus test. Yes, what’s happened in Palestine is atrocious, but people shouldn’t be expected to comment on all things at all times. With that logic, you should expect all celebrities to discuss all geopolitical conflicts at all times such as the conflicts happening currently in Sudan, Congo, Myanmar, etc.

[monstertoronto 11,883]

Celebrities are not politicians. It’s not their obligation to weigh in on every issue. The whole “silence is complicity” is such a false position. It’s essentially trying to control someone’s behaviour by threatening to make an assumption about them if they dont behave the way you want them to. 

Edited 17 hours ago by monstertoronto

[bxr 2,950]

2 hours ago, ****oDanceFight said:

She and Michael have (alleged) Israeli-based investors in their companies, and I'm sure they have (allegedly) invested in Israeli medical technologies. Not because they support Israel as an ethno-state, but because there is a legitimately large medical technology industry

Absolutely prescient observation; but/and (again again), just for the sake of context within the thread … Polansky‘s statement on his professional relationship, at present, with the Founders Fund founding four partners, in August 2026, as a “really, really great experience,” in context of the erstwhile silence, does become a statement in and of itself [as each four partners have positions of significance within the socio-political network dynamics (not at the very least, one partner being an active U.S. Ambassador—on his second appoinment by the current POTUS)] at a more interpersonal level, than just business network / industry geography … over time, the plausible deniability of diplomatic silence for the sake of business proximity does begin to wane in strides from an objective optics perspective … 

Spoiler

 

[ Source ]

Peter Thiel (Palantir, international surveillance database), Sean Parker (Executive Chairman, Stability.AI (Stability Diffusion)—precedent platform for CSAM legislation), Luke Nosek (Founder, Gigafund; SpaceX‘s (Musk) first institutional investor, current SpaceX Board member), and Ken Howery (U.S. Ambassador to Denmark, 2019-2021; U.S. Amabassador to Sweden, 2025-Present)

 

Again, I’m new and novice to the realm of discourse, but just referencing relevant commentary for the sake of observational discourse analysis … where there is absence, there is presence … so, here, it just seems like in the absence of explicit statements appearing as we would assume or expect, the next step is observing the presence of apparently implicit direct statements that exist as they are

But/and, again, I’m new and novice and just learning and gleaning as we go along

 

ETA: Just approaching the situation from the position that Polansky made a direct statement, in 2026, that he positively considers his work experience with individuals who currently express and espouse, and/or represent individuals who express and espouse, certain supremacist views (Thiel; Nosek, Musk; Howery, POTUS) … again, in the absence of an explicit statement at the geopolitical level, this is a direct statement that implies current positive association with conflict-relevant individuals … again, though, this is Polansky‘s position—the statement was not expressed by, nor on behalf of, Gaga

Also, this comment in its entirety is not in direct response or opposition to your comment … you just encapsulated a focal consideration well (DanceFight … ever the articulate one), so your commentary was a lucid catalyst reference point for further riffing 

Edited 17 hours ago by bxr

[gagzus 25,133]

She has worn Palestinian designers, has spread the Free Palestine message on her tour screens and has allowed a Palestinian poet to use her platform and name through her charity. That is more than celebrities just posting empty messages tbh. 

Do you need to say “I am not a Nazi” for people to know you arent a Nazi? Or do you simply not support Nazi related views and people automatically know? 

I get nuance is absolutely abysmally dead nowadays, but I think you can tell that someone who’s clearly a humanitarian—and has done more than those rich people liking or posting Instagram posts—is clearly against modern day Nazi’s.

[ANVEEROY 65,691]

43 minutes ago, Forest said:

Leave it to the LGBTQ community to shun away an actual ally because she doesn’t prioritize homophobic people on the other side of the world.

 

Anyway, Gaga will likely never speak on the subject. Like I said, Gaga now has a half-Jewish child and her safety and well-being should be her priority.

I don't want to interact with Zionists 

[ANVEEROY 65,691]

12 minutes ago, gagzus said:

She has worn Palestinian designers, has spread the Free Palestine message on her tour screens and has allowed a Palestinian poet to use her platform and name through her charity. That is more than celebrities just posting empty messages tbh. 

Do you need to say “I am not a Nazi” for people to know you arent a Nazi? Or do you simply not support Nazi related views and people automatically know? 

I get nuance is absolutely abysmally dead nowadays, but I think you can tell that someone who’s clearly a humanitarian—and has done more than those rich people liking or posting Instagram posts—is clearly against modern day Nazi’s.

Gurl did you know about her new company, I expected better from you

[lastpopicon 37,509]

41 minutes ago, Purrrrrr said:

lemme just delete actually*

Now I dont remember what I liked 

 

[Purrrrrr 18,488]

1 minute ago, lastpopicon said:

Now I dont remember what I liked 

 

it was me not so nicely telling the Forest person to stfu and stop talking ****