BTW Foundation interviewed Palestinian poet

[lastpopicon 37,465]

Gaga follows him, Cynthia  follows him, the foundation follows him.

Gaga can't persaonally talk to everyone  It seems apparent there's some misunderstanding here. They clearly support him and gave him a platform.

[gagzus 24,988]

5 minutes ago, lastpopicon said:

Gaga follows him, Cynthia  follows him, the foundation follows him.

Gaga can't persaonally talk to everyone  It seems apparent there's some misunderstanding here. They clearly support him and gave him a platform.

Like I posted on the last page, his X account is ran by various people not himself.

Edited 22 hours ago by gagzus

[dracomalfoy 1,017]

It's good that the BTWF gave him this platform. No, I'm not fool enough to believe Gaga personally chose him or actively works on the Foundation all the time, but this is in sync from what we know about her and others here have mentioned, she's against violence in general.

I do think is very convenient how this is being posted everywhere as if it's news when it's months old actually, we know her team is in contact with fan accounts so I wonder if they saw this crazy zionist thing about her that gets traction every now and then and decided to act on it. I'm split on what I think about it because ultimately it looks like they're more desperate not to taint her image than actually caring about the genocide. It's good that the BTWF did this but idk if we should parade this as ''LOOK! She's not a zionist!!! She's one of the good guys!!! So it's ok to like her!!!", this just speaks to how performative and virtue signaling these issues are nowadays, esp. Palestine x Israel.

I think the guy is in the right to point out that it wasn't Gaga who chose him and he had no contact with her because that's simply the truth, and this doesn't make Gaga look bad to me. However, the ''if she knew about it she wouldn't have done it'' tweet is very weird, I don't think he owes Gaga any grattitude but that's a very bold accusation to make unprovoked and based on nothing. Him being Palestinian does not make him above criticism like gagzus said.

Ultimately it sucks how what's happening in Palestine has been co-opted into a virtue signaling war online where people do 0 real activism on the subject, and while this may sound parasocial, it sucks to me that Gaga might be having to worry about this while literally having to take care of a newborn, rumors have pointed how hard she worked physically and mentally to get pregnant and she mentioned how much she wanted to be a mom in MAYHEM interviews.

 

[River 128,769]

13 minutes ago, gagacabana said:

And you still didn't say who's running btwf 

the zionists obviously 

[dracomalfoy 1,017]

welp, just saw this 

this is quickly becoming a mess lol 

fire Gregg, girl 

[lastpopicon 37,465]

2 minutes ago, dracomalfoy said:

welp, just saw this 

this is quickly becoming a mess lol 

fire Gregg, girl 

not him hiring a katycat to run his twitter account 

Edited 22 hours ago by lastpopicon

[Bronco 27,819]

33 minutes ago, gagzus said:

Him being Palestinian isn’t remotely to do with it, id have said it about any activist that uses her name and platform to promote themselves but then sh*ts on her responding in a Stan Twitter argument.

But looking at his responses anyway someone already disagreed with him in the same way and he just called them racist and a Zionist. Which isn’t mutually exclusive, he’s not above criticism.

He's not above criticism.

But its just disappointing to see us reducing this all down to stanwar bullshit.

[gagzus 24,988]

3 minutes ago, Bronco said:

He's not above criticism.

But its just disappointing to see us reducing this all down to stanwar bullshit.

I’m not reducing it down to stan wars stuff though? I’m making a point that you can’t stand on a soapbox made using someone else’s notoriety and then within 5 minutes start sh*tting on the person. I’d apply the same rule to anyone. Sure he doesn’t really owe Gaga anything, but you still should respect the platform you’re standing on.

Because even since this interaction began he (or the other guy using his account) has claimed that Gaga and the BTWF are Zionists who were using him. If that’s the belief you have then don‘t use the platform. And don't also literally engage in stan wars in your comments. Because people will absolutely not take you seriously.

[lastpopicon 37,465]

at the end of the day it was a stupid stan war, strange as it may sound  Its clear that whoever was running the account has an agenda against gaga, it engaged multiple stan accounts of other pop acts saying stuff that's straight up from atrl, not something a poet/writer would do, it was very strange, I 100% believe someone was running the account for him.

The good news is, the he already clarified it wasn't him and he loves gaga, I just hope he axes whoever was running the account, which I'm sure he will.

[Bronco 27,819]

3 minutes ago, gagzus said:

I’m not reducing it down to stan wars stuff though? I’m making a point that you can’t stand on a soapbox made using someone else’s notoriety and then within 5 minutes start sh*tting on the person. I’d apply the same rule to anyone. Sure he doesn’t really owe Gaga anything, but you still should respect the platform you’re standing on.

Because even since this interaction began he (or the other guy using his account) has claimed that Gaga and the BTWF are Zionists who were using him. If that’s the belief you have then don‘t use the platform. And don't also literally engage in stan wars in your comments. Because people will absolutely not take you seriously.

But this is what I'm getting at.

We have an activist who's account was allegedly missused. 

And your response was "**** him, he's a weirdo, this is why Gaga shouldnt support political activists".

It just read like one hell of a wild leap. And a childish one that I don't think you'd be making if it wasnt Gaga in the cross hairs. 

[gagacabana 8,506]

50 minutes ago, lastpopicon said:

Gaga follows him, Cynthia  follows him, the foundation follows him.

Gaga can't persaonally talk to everyone  It seems apparent there's some misunderstanding here. They clearly support him and gave him a platform.

You're brazilian??

[gagacabana 8,506]

43 minutes ago, River said:

the zionists obviously 

[lastpopicon 37,465]

Just now, gagacabana said:

You're brazilian??

Portugal 

Olá 

[Juanlittlem 49,647]

3 minutes ago, gagacabana said:

You're brazilian??

HELP @River THEYRE SPREADING

[nATAH 57,960]

16 hours ago, 50 Ft Queenie said:

I get that michael is Israeli

you're not even on the right side of TODAY, michael is jewish lol

get your facts right before you call her out