Jump to content
politics

2028 Official Speculation Thread


LateToCult
 Share

Featured Posts

Bronco
1 minute ago, LateToCult said:

He’s so full of sh*t but I think there’s a grain of truth there. She’d erode his edge over other contenders. I still think he’s running regardless.

Two besties who aren’t besties anymore. It’s kind of sad. :billie:

IMG-7983.jpg

IMG-7981.jpg

This coming after his latest trip to SC means he knows he isn't winning the black vote in the Democratic primary. 

Which is the key voting bloc in the first Democratic primary contest. 

The gays know how to party
Link to post
Share on other sites

LateToCult
On 9/14/2026 at 3:19 PM, Bronco said:

This coming after his latest trip to SC means he knows he isn't winning the black vote in the Democratic primary. 

Which is the key voting bloc in the first Democratic primary contest. 

It was a smart move on his part. They’re lowkey performing a targeted hit on her atm. 
 

Dog whistle for big donors from shared interests groups:

Media asking Booker, Buttigieg, and Pritzker if they share the same views as Newsom. An innocent question, but paints a subtle story of coronation. 
 

Two recent Pod Save America guests weighed in on a Harris run. One emphasized that Harris will make a responsible decision about running (alluding that she should not.) The other highlighting that Americans don’t believe Harris is authentic and that sometimes nothing you do can shake that image off. 
 

Then there’s this:

This is the political machine’s equivalent to firing a warning shot. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

LateToCult

Btw, names of people I think are worth keeping an eye on a few weeks away from the Midterms:

Republicans:

J.D. Vance 

Marco Rubio

Pete Hegseth

Ted Cruz

Brandon Gill



Democrats:

Gavin Newsom

Kamala Harris

Andy Beshear

Jon Ossoff

Raphael Warnock

Josh Shapiro

J.B. Pritzker 

Cory Booker

Wes Moore

Mark Kelly 

Pete Buttigieg 

AOC

Ro Khanna

Rahm Emmanuel

Elisa Slotkin

Gretchen Whitmer 

 

Edited by LateToCult
Link to post
Share on other sites

PartySick
1 hour ago, LateToCult said:

Pete Hegseth

This is hilarious considering congress is out for weeks just to avoid voting on his impeachment lmao

1 hour ago, LateToCult said:

Democrats:

Gavin Newsom

Kamala Harris

Andy Beshear

Jon Ossoff

Raphael Warnock

Josh Shapiro

J.B. Pritzker 

Cory Booker

Wes Moore

Mark Kelly 

Pete Buttigieg 

AOC

Ro Khanna

Rahm Emmanuel

Elisa Slotkin

Gretchen Whitmer 

Kamala, AOC, Ossoff, Buttigieg. In that order.

Everyone else can go away 'cause I either hate them or don't know them :neyde: 

Whimsical bitch
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

LateToCult
10 minutes ago, PartySick said:

This is hilarious considering congress is out for weeks just to avoid voting on his impeachment lmao

Kamala, AOC, Ossoff, Buttigieg. In that order.

Everyone else can go away 'cause I either hate them or don't know them :neyde: 

Sister, they’re bullying Kamala out, AOC focusing on NY lately, Ossoff is completely dependent on KLB winning her race, and Pete is just gay. It may be time to expand the horizons. :billie:

Link to post
Share on other sites

PartySick
34 minutes ago, LateToCult said:

It may be time to expand the horizons. :billie:

No :crossed: 

I'll write in Joe Biden :whitney:

Whimsical bitch
  • LMAO 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bronco

Honestly, if the midterms go even half as good as the polling suggests then both party primaries are going to look very different to what we're expecting atm. 

Midterms always shape the invisible primary. And if the Dems do as well as they could possibly do, the Republican candidate will end up being someone from outside of the current potential pack. 

The gays know how to party
Link to post
Share on other sites

PartySick
3 hours ago, Bronco said:

Honestly, if the midterms go even half as good as the polling suggests then both party primaries are going to look very different to what we're expecting atm. 

Midterms always shape the invisible primary. And if the Dems do as well as they could possibly do, the Republican candidate will end up being someone from outside of the current potential pack. 

Truly. If they losing ground in Texas, Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, South Carolina, South Dakota, and freaking Wyoming because of how bad this administration is then nobody who works near or under Trump can win in 2028.

Vance, Rubio, Kegsbreath, they're nonstarters.

Whimsical bitch
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bronco
1 hour ago, PartySick said:

Truly. If they losing ground in Texas, Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, South Carolina, South Dakota, and freaking Wyoming because of how bad this administration is then nobody who works near or under Trump can win in 2028.

Vance, Rubio, Kegsbreath, they're nonstarters.

Exactly. Especially if Trump is alive firing pot shots from the sidelines. 
They either have to run as a continunity candidate from within his team, or directly clash with him. 
Continuity loses them the general, clashing with him loses them the primaries (Trumps core 30%). 

An outsider will have a far easier time of just being like "Ignore Trump, he's not running". 

The gays know how to party
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...