Zara Larsson Battles Wikipedia Editor Over Photo Choice

[RAMROD 113,169]

 

It’s a battle of two people with way too much time on their hands, as Zara Larsson picks a fight with a Wikipedia editor over a photo choice.

“Whoever the **** is changing this ****ing Wikipedia picture to this picture, stop! Stop doing it! I will never stop, I will never stop changing that picture,” she said in a new TikTok. The video also shows her using her Wikipedia editor pictures to change the image to what she considers a “nice one.” 

 

https://consequence.net/2026/02/zara-larsson-wikipedia-editor-photo/

[jackweller 455]

Good luck to her because they will put protection on the page and she won’t be able to edit at all haha

[gagzus 17,833]

i dont think she realises that Wikipedia is a facts based information site, they HAVE to use a true to life image for everyone (as in no editing or anything like what she’s posting), they also MUST pay for the license to the image they use and sometimes people hike their prices when big companies want to use them.

Also the image they have for her is still gorgeous I think, she still looks beautiful, she’s part of the everything must be edited and filtered generation though.

Edited 3 hours ago by gagzus

[DESTROY UR DISEASE 14,843]

11 minutes ago, jackweller said:

Good luck to her because they will put protection on the page and she won’t be able to edit at all haha

Well they already did that 

 

But at least they kept the picture she wanted

[DESTROY UR DISEASE 14,843]

Also I went to check the edits history and she named herself Stopchangingmyprofilepicture

[NemoMyName 1,605]

This is weird. Editing your own wikipedia page? What a egomaniac ew.

[Hadrian 1,105]

lmao. this reminds me of when gaga tried to change her (incorrect) wikipedia page 

[RAMROD 113,169]

5 minutes ago, NemoMyName said:

This is weird. Editing your own wikipedia page? What a egomaniac ew.

That's the way it should be tho? Who else most eligible to add information about their own life but themselves? 

[NemoMyName 1,605]

31 minutes ago, RAMROD said:

That's the way it should be tho? Who else most eligible to add information about their own life but themselves? 

It's a wikipedia article, not a PR article or autobiography.

[Jill 30,734]

37 minutes ago, RAMROD said:

That's the way it should be tho? Who else most eligible to add information about their own life but themselves? 

You can't just add or change information though, even if it's a page about yourself. You need to follow the format, add citations from reputable sources, and other things. Even it it's biased as hell in some things, Wikipedia still follows quasi-academic standards.

1 hour ago, gagzus said:

they also MUST pay for the license to the image they use and sometimes people hike their prices when big companies want to use them.

Wikipedia can only use images coming from Wikimedia Commons, which are generally public domain. That's also a very big obstacle, but a rule that keeps them from being sued into oblivion every other day.

[dit 46,693]

she's so funny and she kinda reminds me of Rihanna's humor back in the day  

[Killa 18,161]

Ofc She looks gorgeous but no One wants a photo like that of themselves. Its not egomaniacal for christ sakes. And ofc this Is mostly for the giggles.

I would love tò see most of you, and if you won't try to have a decent photo of yourself, according tò your own standards. People are protective of their looks. Its normal