Jump to content
Poster
celeb

Music executive says artists can stay independent if they don't like label terms


Teletubby
 Share

Featured Posts

bionic

If the labels are expecting the artist to treat their music 'career' as their MAIN employment then the artist should get benefits to that affect. The contracts are exploitative by design just as much by nature and "this is the way it is, nobody is forcing you to do it" is the same excuse all crooks use when exploiting their employees.

stream ritacadabra
  • Like 9
  • Thanks 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Jill
55 minutes ago, MaybeKermit said:

They both make very good points tbh. 

No they don't. The label executive's the only one in the wrong here. A record label has a much greater capacity to absorb higher financial costs without being significantly affected, unlike an independent artist who lacks the resources or connections that a record label possesses. Also, the promotional opportunities and visibility provided by a record label are simply unmatched. Being signed to a label is essentially the only way to become an established artist. There's a reason why the vast majority of mainstream artists are signed to record labels, and why only a small percentage of them (usually powerful artists) have the means to create their own label and/or go independent and handle their own distribution tasks.

What record labels do is not at all easy, and this person is taking advantage of many people's ignorance on the subject. If record labels present something as complex as this issue in such a black-and-white, oversimplified manner, it's because they simply don't want to treat artists as employees. Doing so would mean incurring additional expenses that they consider unnecessary, which is unfair. While they don't treat artists as employees, they are the ones who primarily benefit from their success.

This is a highly unequal relationship, and this executive portrays it as if it were perfectly balanced.

Edited by Jill
Former First Lady of the United States. Now card-carrying member of the Communist Party of China (CPC).
  • Like 6
  • LMAO 1
  • Thanks 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Red

Don’t like your job? You can be unemployed and survive! It will only be a tad more difficult with no money 😊 

If you see me posting like crazy, I'm either bored or procrastinating.
  • LMAO 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

palma

I checked his wiki to see who tf he was and the edit there is taking me :brat: - they ate him up.

Spoiler

"Following Chappell Roan’s searing indictment of the music industry during her acceptance speech at the 67th Annual Grammy Awards on February 2, 2025, music executive Jeff Rabhan rushed to the defense of record labels with a tone-deaf and widely condemned op-ed in The Hollywood Reporter. In a desperate attempt to justify the exploitative business model that has drained artists of their earnings for decades, Rabhan shamelessly dismissed Roan’s concerns about fair wages and healthcare, insisting that labels have “no obligation” to ensure the financial well-being of the artists they profit from.

Rabhan, a relic of an industry built on taking advantage of young talent, peddled the tired narrative that artists should simply be grateful for any opportunity to work under a system that routinely underpays and discards them. His remarks were met with immediate outrage, as musicians and industry professionals called out his blatant disregard for the well-being of those who actually create the music that fuels his paycheck. Critics were quick to highlight Rabhan’s own cushy career—one built on exploiting artists—making his defense of corporate greed all the more revolting.

The response to Rabhan’s op-ed was swift and unforgiving. Artists, fans, and industry insiders tore apart his argument, labeling him as nothing more than a mouthpiece for record executives desperate to maintain their stranglehold on the industry. His name trended for all the wrong reasons, as many called for a complete overhaul of the label system he so fervently defends.

Roan, though she didn’t address Rabhan directly, didn’t need to—her speech had already ignited a larger conversation, one that made it clear that the days of unchecked label exploitation are numbered. Rabhan’s feeble attempt to silence that conversation only confirmed what many have long suspected: the industry’s gatekeepers are more terrified than ever of artists demanding what they deserve."

point-teklok.gif

Is there some reason my LG7 isn't here? Has she died or something?
  • YAAAS 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

infinitesadness

people saying 'its part of the job' are missing the point.

this is more in regards to her voicing her discomfort in the way she's been treated, but music execs telling her to put up or shut up is just very telling of how they break people into doing whatever they're told. those music execs are not the ones dealing with harassment and stalking to the same degree, if at all. they're acting like her demands are unrealistic just to keep breaking down young women, so they stop asking for what they need in this kind of career.

when I was a teenager, there was a guy at my work who kept trying to touch me, then kiss me. i brushed it off thinking it was normal because most girls my age have experienced similar things. i remember being told to just let him do it so I don't make him sad, I really had no way of asserting myself.

as I got older I began to see a pattern of people diminishing young women's boundaries because 'it's always been this way' or 'find something else to do' (lmao).... only in my adulthood did I realize how inconsiderate it is to tell people to just put up with something at the cost of their personal safety. i wish I knew then.

a young woman, famous or not; doesn't owe anyone grace, especially if their personal wellbeing and privacy is being compromised. even if its just a press photographer yelling at you. they try to make you look crazy so you stop asserting your needs. i think asking for healthcare coverage is a tiny ask compared to all the other **** young artists are being put through

Link to post
Share on other sites

phantasmas

Artists also need to get good lawyers to review/revise contracts before signing, imo

I've heard of many artists being shelved by their label not realizing that their contract had no agreed upon timeframe to release music so they just end up in limbo 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...