Cher Very Humbly Embraces Vocal Limitations

[Economy 46,615]

I love how shes always so honest and straight. And she doesnt try to sugar coat stuff to look better.

 

Here she talks about how Autotune in Believe happened because she couldn't sing the chorus well enough

 

Here she says she prefers acting than sining because she feels shes very talented in acting and has no boundries but she feels shes not a great singer so she often cant hit notes she wants to @ 5:26 time point

 

 

I just love how she self analysis herself so honestly and openly both the strengths and the weaknesses

 

 

Edited 6 hours ago by Economy
Typo

[Zaskar 3,717]

 about Madonna being mean lol

[Economy 46,615]

5 minutes ago, Zaskar said:

 about Madonna being mean lol

I know that part made me laugh

[hELXIG 41,336]

We love a humble queen. Honestly a bit of humbleness goes a long way. She has a really great voice though 

[Economy 46,615]

1 hour ago, hELXIG said:

We love a humble queen. Honestly a bit of humbleness goes a long way. She has a really great voice though 

Yeah her voice aint bad. Shes no Whitney Huston, Lady Gaga or Adele tho and shes aware of that

 

But that doesnt make her untalented nevethless as she has so many other strengths and atributes that made her the legendary icon that she is

 

Idc what ppl say. To me I admire her more than Madonna. Madonna managed to be a great business woman above all but as a performer, singer, actress etc she was always average at best to me with her bigger strength being more just in being creative (which to be fair at least made her interesting and the music wasnt bad either) But does she deserve to be the #1 most successful female artist of all time? Imo no

 

Mediocraty seems to always win tho somehow. TS is surpassing all of Madonnas records one by one and at least Madonna was interesting and artistic despite mediocraty in other aspects. Taylor Swift is only super talented in inflating numbers with never ending variants

Edited 7 hours ago by Economy

[Gaga Scholar 29]

27 minutes ago, Economy said:

at least Madonna was interesting and artistic

[PartySick 143,794]

My favorite part of her show was when she had a ten minute story time

[Economy 46,615]

5 minutes ago, PartySick said:

My favorite part of her show was when she had a ten minute story time

To be fair all her stories are like 10 minutes cuz she always looses herself in deep train of thought and rambles on and on and on but i love it

 

Also I love how badly she trashed talked Madonna (including in this video). "Shes mean, shes rude, shes a spoiled bratt" 

Edited 6 hours ago by Economy

[hELXIG 41,336]

36 minutes ago, Economy said:

Yeah her voice aint bad. Shes no Whitney Huston, Lady Gaga or Adele tho and shes aware of that

 

But that doesnt make her untalented nevethless as she has so many other strengths and atributes that made her the legendary icon that she is

 

Idc what ppl say. To me I admire her more than Madonna. Madonna managed to be a great business woman above all but as a performer, singer, actress etc she was always average at best to me with her bigger strength being more just in being creative (which to be fair at least made her interesting and the music wasnt bad either) But does she deserve to be the #1 most successful female artist of all time? Imo no

 

Mediocraty seems to always win tho somehow. TS is surpassing all of Madonnas records one by one and at least Madonna was interesting and artistic despite mediocraty in other aspects. Taylor Swift is only super talented in inflating numbers with never ending variants

Ha that's funny, when you were talking about Madonna being more about marketability than genuine art I immediately thought of Taylor. I guess it doesn't matter, there are multiple ways to be a performer. I guess a lot of us in this fanbase prefer art over commercial success (well.. most). The only thing I don't like is when one artists blocks other artists just to stay on top instead of supporting others..

Someone needs to cure the disease

 

[Economy 46,615]

11 minutes ago, hELXIG said:

Ha that's funny, when you were talking about Madonna being more about marketability than genuine art I immediately thought of Taylor. I guess it doesn't matter, there are multiple ways to be a performer. I guess a lot of us in this fanbase prefer art over commercial success (well.. most). The only thing I don't like is when one artists blocks other artists just to stay on top instead of supporting others..

Someone needs to cure the disease

 

Yeah I guess history repeats itself. Some of us (including myself) thought in early years Gaga was gonna be the biggest female artist of this generation (commercially) like Madonna was for her generatiom and that her embodying similarities such as pushing boundries and being provocative was the common denominator that woukd cause that parallel

 

In the end Taylor Swift won as the biggest female artist of this generation and the relevant common denomonator ended up being being a good business woman with good marketability not the provocativeness, art or pushing boundries. I guess since music is an industry after all we shouldnt be surprised.

 

But imo Taylor is even more mediocre than Madonna. At least Madonna despite singing kinda bad at times and not being able to act when she tried... at least she was artistic and interesting on the performances and visuals which still made her an icon. Overrated maybe but still a deserving icon. I feel Taylor on the otherhand is average on everything. Shes not spectacular or the best in the industry in anything

 

But its fine if Gaga isnt the biggest commercially. She has the icon and commercial impact and critical acclaim anyway. She still will be remembered for that.

 

I see Gaga into her 50s, 60s even 70s having random little comebacks like Cher did (Cher is the only woman in history to have a #1 on hot 100 past age 50). Im not as convinced Taylor past 50 will have any comebacks when her generic appeal completely dies so I suspect Gaga will still have more longevity.

Edited 6 hours ago by Economy