Jump to content
politics

SCOTUS secures pre-election Trump sentencing


StarstruckIllusion

Featured Posts

StarstruckIllusion
1 hour ago, Morphine Prince said:

The sentencing is actually September 18, we are eating good!

EATING DELECTABLE DISHES 😋😋😋

I just need a 6 months prison sentence…

past inauguration day…

if we can’t have Kamala let’s at least have that 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, androiduser said:

but.. if he is cleared before the election, it will only give him advantage

He's not going to be cleared; he's already been convicted. This is just the sentencing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

androiduser
5 minutes ago, Nemo said:

He's not going to be cleared; he's already been convicted. This is just the sentencing.

thanks for the info, didn't know this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

AsleepOnTheCeiling

I could see SCOTUS staying low and avoiding controversy over the next few months. Riling people up about checks and balances on SCOTUS with more controversial decisions is not good during an election year in which their political party is losing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rat Boy
6 hours ago, Nemo said:

He's not going to be cleared; he's already been convicted. This is just the sentencing.

Oh so this will just formalise the conviction?

"****ing rat" - @Dynamite
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rat Boy said:

Oh so this will just formalise the conviction?

Eh, it's fully formalized already. This is just the "OK then, so what's the punishment?" phase. Why are they separate? Don't ask me. It's a thing. :shrug: A lot of people would have been held (i.e. in jail) pending sentencing, though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

MonsterJay
18 minutes ago, MOT said:

Can he appeal the sentence ?

He’ll probably try and ignore it like Chanel from Scream Queens

scream queens what GIF

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ziggy
14 hours ago, Morphine Prince said:

The sentencing is actually September 18, we are eating good!

So it’ll be old news by the time of Election Day :laughga:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ziggy
4 hours ago, Nemo said:

Eh, it's fully formalized already. This is just the "OK then, so what's the punishment?" phase. Why are they separate? Don't ask me. It's a thing. :shrug: A lot of people would have been held (i.e. in jail) pending sentencing, though.

I believe they’re separate as they’re kind of two separate processes. One is to find out if they’re guilty and how much. That degree of guilty could change a lot of the outcome for how and where a sentencing happens/is served but would be extra work if it winds up he’s not guilty or less guilty than thought. So I get why you’d make sentencing a separate thing in that regard. It seems more efficient to not potentially do unnecessary work. Though why it’s taking this long to hold a sentencing hearing is beyond me lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...