Stef 61,491 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 39 minutes ago, PartySick said: Not sure anyone cares if she's on it or not, just that her cover isn't giving minimalist and trendy, it's just...ugly, boring, plain, and lazy Bright green with arial font (usually the first font on anyone's list of free fonts) and not even capitalized Who told her that was ok Omg ur back in ur gold era im MOVINGGG welcome back u abso legend x Signature loading… 👹🖤 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco 5,703 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 Honestly I do agree with her point. I just think it's irrelevant to the "artwork" she used for her album cover. There's a wealth of Rock/Metal acts who's album artwork has literally always been drawn art as opposed to a photoshoot. Galantis went through a phase where every single had some weird fantastic animal face on it. If she wanted the album cover to reflect her point she could have done something creative like having the traditional album cover photoshoot, but then having herself deliberately cut out leaving the outline to make the point. As it stands, it looks like she's just using feminism to make herself 'invulnerable' to critique on a lazy album cover. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stef 61,491 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 Signature loading… 👹🖤 1 27 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Controversiaga 9,242 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 (edited) It’s an ugly cover you can have a graphic design cover without you on it look at the veronicas even this one: and mind you, the Veronicas are not ugly and their faces would not deter someone from listening to their album, someone’s graphic art can be enough! Edited March 14 by Controversiaga Pronounced like “Balenciaga” . Emphasis on the “Ga” 1 3 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roughhouse Dandy 8,357 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 She's making throwback rave-y dance music. The cover looks like early 2000's flyers for parties that would be bumping her songs. Not every album cover has to feature the artist on it. This whole thing is so annoying; y'all (the tiny internet people in my phone) were hyping up the y2k aesthetic so lay in the bed you made. This is my Hannah Montana™️ lipgloss. 1 1 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARTPOPKISS 3,333 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 Personally I don't mind the cover I think it's got like pop minimalism computer vube to it rlly putting the PC in PC MUSIC F@ggotry at its finest 1 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alsemanche 91,794 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 4 minutes ago, Controversiaga said: It’s an ugly cover you can have a graphic design cover without you on it look at the veronicas Mind you, even her pop 2 vinyl cover was CUNT Soft, soothing, and succulent 1 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alsemanche 91,794 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 5 minutes ago, Stef said: HELPPZNSKSMMS Soft, soothing, and succulent Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Controversiaga 9,242 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 Just now, alsemanche said: Mind you, even her pop 2 vinyl cover was **** This!! Yes!!! Like cum on Pronounced like “Balenciaga” . Emphasis on the “Ga” Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Debithius 5,483 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 Nobody cares if you are on the cover or not, the cover is just ugly 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIM820 1,747 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 (edited) 4 hours ago, NATAH said: it's just sh*tty design, flat out 4 hours ago, Lucas said: "Mysoginistic"... people are using all the big words every 5 seconds nowadays. Your album cover is just not good lol 4 hours ago, Pretty Savage said: It’s not that deep lmao. You’re putting out something for your fans of course they’re going to criticize it. It’s not about your face or your body being on the cover it’s the laziness and the lack of creativity. 4 hours ago, bionic said: girl nobody said they want your body or face on it To be fair, the tweet she’s addressing and the comments underneath it are kinda saying stuff specifically about their bodies and images. Maybe not Charli’s, but definitely the other women. I don’t think they are intentionally being weird about it either, because they are really just commenting on how they are being displayed, not how they actually look. But that fixation IS becoming weird though. I’ve been noticing it more probably since GUTS was announced. Maybe I paid no attention to it before but I could swear it used to be like “wow I hate this cover” and we move on and just listen to the music. Now there are constant tweets, threads, and put downs about them everywhere, even going as far as trying to bully the artist into changing it in every comment. Then they show edits/AI of what they want and it’s usually a mix of pretty, glamorous, hyper feminine and sexy. So… I don’t think not liking a female artists’ cover is misogynistic, but the dialogue surrounding it is becoming very hard to deny lately. Edited March 14 by HIM820 2 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PartySick 144,800 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 39 minutes ago, Stef said: Omg ur back in ur gold era im MOVINGGG welcome back u abso legend x I have things to help with so I needed to be official again Feels good to have power again though! I mean...responsibility and a duty to this site and the gals, gays, and strays that call it home, yeah Spoiler 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oriane 19,762 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 I love that the other covers from the tweet DO show women's faces and bodies, totally disproving her point You popped my heart seams, all my bubble dreams 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy scheisse 21,603 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 The 3 covers in that tweet aside from charli’s are perfectly fine album covers imo lol hers looks stupid and I say that as a big Charli fan it doesn’t need to be her face or body… but whatever she’s the artist and we’re the public so, lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reality 71,851 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 girl... It's genuinely just an ugly album cover. It has nothing to do with the fact that you're not in the cover art. Also, before coming to this thread, I've scrolled past that image on Twitter so many times. I didn't even realize it was her cover art, I thought it was a meme 𝕀𝕗 𝕪𝕠𝕦 𝕨𝕖𝕣𝕖 𝕒 𝕤𝕚𝕟𝕟𝕖𝕣, 𝕀 𝕔𝕠𝕦𝕝𝕕 𝕞𝕒𝕜𝕖 𝕪𝕠𝕦 𝕓𝕖𝕝𝕚𝕖𝕧𝕖 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.