Do you agree with Taylor being the best at re-inventing herself?

[EGOT2027 10,801]

gaga and taylor are both amazing artists who reinvent themselves in completely different ways.

taylor is the songwriting queen of endless genres. i was stunned at the eras tour how she managed to keep a stadium so engaged and singing every word during everything from pop to country to folklore and evermore. 

gaga is the queen of always doing the unexpected (from ARTPOP to jazz to joanne to asib to chromatica to house of gucci to love for sale to chromatica ball).

both artists are once in a lifetime type of icons. anyone suggesting otherwise is silly

[Better Day 5,766]

21 hours ago, killme89 said:

Lol ummm idk what you’re trying to imply with that response but umm ok. 

A lot of Andy Warhol’s art had similar looks. Does that mean he was not a real artist? 

[ChicaSkas 22,287]

On 8/17/2023 at 7:10 AM, JohnnyVersace said:

 

Like sorry girlies but Gaga singing Starstruck is not going to equate to Taylor performing Long Live 

Wait can you imagine gaga doing secret songs and singing starstruck acoustically at a piano?? That would actually slay

[ChicaSkas 22,287]

On 8/17/2023 at 9:46 AM, Maxine Puth said:

I understand race is a factor with how we view and interpret artists and people in general (that’s just how society is) but this point is kinda void considering Taylor’s agreed upon protégé (aka the kinda quirky relatable singer songwriter type) is a said woman of color 

Not being hardcore taylor, I gotta ask, who is her protégé? 

[Ziggy 10,734]

On 8/17/2023 at 4:02 PM, PartySick said:

This lends itself to my point in another thread that idek what Taylor's artistic identity is

Some call her "the MJ/Madonna/etc" of our generation but what iconic influence will she actually have? Name something she's extremely well known for that doesn't have a price tag on it and isn't some stupid joke about her ex boyfriends 

I think her influence was def on a generation of diaristic singer songwriter girlies. It had been done before in the 90s ofc and the 70s before that BUT I think in the 2000s gen, she definitely had led that charge and inspired a lot of up and coming songwriters. All that said, do I think that’s the same as MJ or Madonna? Nah but I think her impact is there just not very aesthetically distinctively. But again I also don’t think she’s really tried to do that either! So I think people need to level set the comparisons a bit

[Ziggy 10,734]

5 hours ago, ChicaSkas said:

Not being hardcore taylor, I gotta ask, who is her protégé? 

Apparently Olivia rodrigo but I feel like I remember Olivia saying don’t meet your heroes about her (essentially) 

[President Biden 5,898]

Nowadays? Sure. But thats bc she has good health and has churned out gobs of music.

 

Gaga, Madonna, Katy Perry, Michael Jackson. Thats the truth

[President Biden 5,898]

gonna throw this out there

 

Miley Cyrus is a bit of an eras queen herself

[Sepsami 17,705]

Taylor being the best at re-inventing herself? WHAT? On Gagadaily??? Delusional gays really only care about the charts holy hell. 

[Economy 47,027]

On 8/16/2023 at 11:18 PM, ALGAYDO said:

No lol Gaga and Bey are miles better at “re-inventing” themselves. Taylor is good at it too, don’t get me wrong, but at a much smaller scale imo.  

This. Taylor is very good at what she does and ppl love her for it (including me), and thats all great

 

But Queen of reinvention is not what id call her. Others (including Gaga) are more deserving of that title

[julz 5,547]

Not really.. okay next Taylor thread