Guest Posted June 15, 2023 Share Posted June 15, 2023 45 minutes ago, Modern Ecstasy2 said: I’m so deep in the fan base that I often wonder how these situations are perceived by the general public. Like how much people actually care, what do people think, how much attention does it really get beyond the little managers. Everyday people do not know or care at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaga2645 2,251 Posted June 15, 2023 Share Posted June 15, 2023 1 hour ago, Tinnitus15 said: A journalist said the whole cast of Joker 2 had to sign a non-speaking on political views disclosure. That’s why Gaga’s been silent I wouldn’t be surprised if they want clout. The set already had some controversy with that no bathroom breaks stuff I doubt they would on top of that make them sign an NDA saying not to get political. Especially when BTWF has been tweeting about pride every day (I also just realized the bio on twitter is set up to portray that gaga and her mom are behind it [even though we all know it’s interns, like her IG]) and in regards to my last sentence above, I think sometimes she does make her own posts I’m not saying she’s 100% absent. But I do think most of it is contracted ads ran by interns and if there’s backlash they just let her know and she just posts something if need be because they already know all she has to do is say hi in a selfie and the Stan’s switch back to gagging (🚬🚬🚬) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaga2645 2,251 Posted June 15, 2023 Share Posted June 15, 2023 57 minutes ago, Nedster said: The music she used, and Nicki's song she used recently too. I hope she's not feeling inspired by hip hop lately and LG7 is like jewels n drugs... Jdkdkvkekd lmaoaoaoooo tbh I think that’s just her using the algorithm for HL (nicki) and she probably liked the specific lyric in the post from last night. Side note my friend said the rapper is Halle Bailey’s bf, Gaga a Little Mermaid stan confirmed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queen Gloria 3,464 Posted June 16, 2023 Share Posted June 16, 2023 Inspired to Spoiler release the Chromatica film?.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALGAYDO 33,562 Posted June 16, 2023 Share Posted June 16, 2023 1 minute ago, Queen Gloria said: Inspired to Hide contents release the Chromatica film?.. Inspired to never release pop music for the gays again Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micmaky 917 Posted June 16, 2023 Share Posted June 16, 2023 I think it’s better these days when celebs ignore mini controversies. This has had zero media coverage and has actually fallen flat on Twitter despite some haters and extreme Gaga fans trying to make it a thing. Her super casual post just kinda shows that she’s above any of these dramas. If she did a full apology it would have made international news Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starmie25 19,905 Posted June 16, 2023 Share Posted June 16, 2023 8 hours ago, Queen Gloria said: release the Chromatica film? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnglerfishbraBENUS 5,734 Posted June 16, 2023 Share Posted June 16, 2023 47 minutes ago, Glojuice said: I think it’s better these days when celebs ignore mini controversies. This has had zero media coverage and has actually fallen flat on Twitter despite some haters and extreme Gaga fans trying to make it a thing. Her super casual post just kinda shows that she’s above any of these dramas. If she did a full apology it would have made international news she learned a lot from ARTPOP. things will pass if you stand your ground and let them Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mother of Puppies 36,486 Posted June 16, 2023 Share Posted June 16, 2023 51 minutes ago, Glojuice said: If she did a full apology it would have made international news She’d be in trouble with Pfizer if she apologized for doing that ad. Lol That would be a breach of contract THEY CALL ME LADY MOP Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 50,705 Posted June 17, 2023 Share Posted June 17, 2023 On 6/15/2023 at 1:36 PM, LunaUniverse said: That makes 0 sense from a contract stand point. I have never heard of a studio removing an actor’s right of free speech for a movie I saw on Reddit someone pointed out the fact that Haus Labs is a private company, and theorized private investors have some sort of hold on how she promotes her socials, because private companies are much more regulated. It’s just a theory and might not be the reason why she isn’t speaking more, but it’s certainly more realistic than a studio making a well known actor sign something to give up their political views How much of Haus Labs is owned by investors? This is a good point I didn't think of. When you own a company or are the CEO of it etc but u don't own the entire amount, the other players can pressure u to do or act certain ways even if you are the largest share holder. Especially if the biggest share holder still owns less than 50% of it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
G U C C I 5,513 Posted June 17, 2023 Share Posted June 17, 2023 1 hour ago, Economy said: How much of Haus Labs is owned by investors? This is a good point I didn't think of. When you own a company or are the CEO of it etc but u don't own the entire amount, the other players can pressure u to do or act certain ways even if you are the largest share holder. Especially if the biggest share holder still owns less than 50% of it Upon conception and partnership with Coty, Gaga owned 51% making it her company and a true start up. I find it hard to believe a studio would try and have Gaga sign an nda over political statements given who she is and her past. But I can see them issuing a warning to everyone not to be overly political online and give some a reason to get behind not seeing the movie in theaters. The movie industry is desperate for butts in seats for theatrical runs and this movie could be huge winner in that aspect. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 50,705 Posted June 17, 2023 Share Posted June 17, 2023 18 minutes ago, G U C C I said: Upon conception and partnership with Coty, Gaga owned 51% making it her company and a true start up. I find it hard to believe a studio would try and have Gaga sign an nda over political statements given who she is and her past. But I can see them issuing a warning to everyone not to be overly political online and give some a reason to get behind not seeing the movie in theaters. The movie industry is desperate for butts in seats for theatrical runs and this movie could be huge winner in that aspect. Yeah with 51% ownership u are always the majority and no one else can force you to do anything even if all 49% of other ownerships collectively agreed on something against you Even so, they can still excersize pressure on you. Even a majority stake holder isn't immune to influence from others in the company especially if you need other investors capital I'm not totally shocked if it were true she was advised or pressured for marketing purposes to not be overly vocal on politics and that would explain her shift in being less vocal but at the same time if this is just a rumour I would not take it too seriously Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.