Prince Harry reveals he has enough information for a second book

[Controversiaga 9,495]

Oh god he can keep it . We don’t care about him 

[Concertaholic 5,483]

46 minutes ago, alsemanche said:

So disliking Harry means I love the royal family now?  The monarchy can choke, so can anyone who benefits from it. Harry is still a 'royal' and he's profiting quite a lot from both his blood relations to his family and from this whole 'scandal' he and his wife have been riding. 

Not to mention that his book has been turned into a meme if anything. None of that mess is bringing down any monarchy lmao. 

In my opinion discrediting Harry just plays right into Charles and Camilla and the monarchists hands tho

[Natalia Kills 377]

37 minutes ago, Concertaholic said:

In my opinion discrediting Harry just plays right into Charles and Camilla and the monarchists hands tho

I'm a monarchist and I agree to your point!

I had bad expectations for this book, but it's worked out quite well. It's good to see the tide turn on image-heavy Hollywood culture and common sense prevail. 

[AkariGaga 1,102]

1 hour ago, Pineapple said:

I'm a monarchist and I agree to your point!

I had bad expectations for this book, but it's worked out quite well. It's good to see the tide turn on image-heavy Hollywood culture and common sense prevail. 

Ok Harry , we see you

[sara57 2,903]

We don't want it 

[Sugar Baby 765]

Harry and Meghan and such attention whores and always thinking of themselves Lmao 

anyone siding with them it’s just blind 

[hELXIG 41,876]

Please no! 

That one excerpt from the audio book of him explaining his 'todger' oscillating from being aroused to in pain (or whatever) and having to rub the same cream on it that his mother (princess Diana) rubbed on her lips... was ENOUGH information

[Monstermilo 3,827]

not ppl being in denial that the royal family is trash 

 

[FfFfFfFF 54,263]

I actually want more drama and things to laugh at so yes, please.  His reputation is already gone, might as well keep everything going for another book at least.

[Shipper 12,907]

So it turns out that the tasteful one was Meghan and the trashy messy one was Prince Harry. I really enjoyed Meghan's podcast and it was about important topics and not all about her. 

And everyone was bad mouthing Meghan as if she was the devil incarnate who defiled their sweet innocent prince. 

Will he write smut next? 

[HermioneT 1,985]

6 hours ago, MaybeKermit said:

Ugh tbh I had a lot of sympathy for Harry and Meghan bcs we know how cruel the royal family can be, and Im saying this as someone who doesnt even follow half of what they put out in the news

BUT wth are he and his wife doing ? It all comes across very cheap and tacky? Why the need to release these books and all jeez, just go on live ur life finally! 

💯

for someone who claimed that he wanted peace from the press (rightfully so) he seems quite desperate to stay in press.

[Sir 1,464]

The new main pop girl rises 

[SharGaga 2,906]

This is what happens when you have no talent but are a public figure who wants to make bank selling ur life story as gossip/tabloid fodder. You become a Kardashian.

[SharGaga 2,906]

Quoted myself by mistake. Delete

[ALGAYDO 30,362]

2 hours ago, Helxig said:

Please no! 

That one excerpt from the audio book of him explaining his 'todger' oscillating from being aroused to in pain (or whatever) and having to rub the same cream on it that his mother (princess Diana) rubbed on her lips... was ENOUGH information

Excuse me, what?? 
 

I suddenly want to read this book if it’s full of weird and obviously fake sheisse like this