Jump to content
celeb

Harry Styles & Nick Kroll share a kiss at Venice Film Festival


Teletubby

Featured Posts

RichAssPiss
5 minutes ago, Squidward T said:

If it was geniune male intimacy than fine but its obvious this is for attention and publicity. 

Hi, who are you and how do you know what is "genuine"? What does that even mean? If two men want to kiss, they can. You are playing into antiquated rhetoric. The same kind that was used to say "being gay is a choice, and if it can be chosen it can be legislated." Essentialism is not a part of genuine queer politics. The end of gender norms is. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply
RichAssPiss
8 minutes ago, Squidward T said:

If it was geniune male intimacy than fine but its obvious this is for attention and publicity. 

By your logic people need to prove that they are GENUINELY queer (whatever that means) in order for their romantic and sexual expressions to be valid. And how does one prove that? By taking a **** in the town square? Or would that just be more "queerbaiting" for attention?

Link to post
Share on other sites

RichAssPiss

Queer people are out here trying to restore toxic masculinity by shaming men who show each other physical affection without fear of being perceived as "gay" or "emasculated." You are doing the homophobes' work for them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

RichAssPiss
4 minutes ago, NATAH said:

but is he straight? :oprah:

It doesn't matter! That's the point. Trying to validate people's sexuality to determine their ability to access physical intimacy with the same sex is totally bizarre. If he's straight, fine. If he's a poof, fine. If he's anything else under the sun, huzzah! Let him kiss Nick Kroll for ****'s sake! It's a peck on the mouth. In what society do you need to be queer to do that? Only a totally repressive nightmare state. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RichAssPiss said:

How is this queerbaiting? Straight men kiss. 

You know... Its GGD... And he's Harry Styles

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, RichAssPiss said:

It doesn't matter! That's the point. Trying to validate people's sexuality to determine their ability to access physical intimacy with the same sex is totally bizarre. If he's straight, fine. If he's a poof, fine. If he's anything else under the sun, huzzah! Let him kiss Nick Kroll for ****'s sake! It's a peck on the mouth. In what society do you need to be queer to do that? Only a totally repressive nightmare state. 

hmm... sure :huntyga:

mother, what must i do?
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RichAssPiss said:

Riveting reply.

it's 2am, i'm not in the mood to debate over something you won't change your mind about :messga:

mother, what must i do?
Link to post
Share on other sites

RichAssPiss
9 minutes ago, NATAH said:

it's 2am, i'm not in the mood to debate over something you won't change your mind about :messga:

Then what is the point of replying? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

SharkmanthaC
9 minutes ago, RichAssPiss said:

Then what is the point of replying? 

 

3 minutes ago, NATAH said:

it's a free forum :what:

Embarrassed Schitts Creek GIF by CBC

she/her/hers
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...