SharkmanthaC 111,961 Posted March 29, 2022 Share Posted March 29, 2022 38 minutes ago, Mother of Puppies said: Yes, but if Justin didn't exist, this photo wouldn't even exist. So in this case it's stupid. In my country u could sue the photographer because you have to have permission if u want to take a photograph of someone. So here Justin could basically sue the photographer for taking a pic of him without permission. In the US, you it's legal to take a photo/film someone if they're in public. Thus how paparazzi's get away with some crazy things. she/her/hers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meat 18,962 Posted March 29, 2022 Share Posted March 29, 2022 5 hours ago, AnnaNicoleSmith said: It’s true. It’s just that he’s a stalker, you take pics without permission of people you don’t know. He deserves no credits That’s not how the law works Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mother of Puppies 36,260 Posted March 29, 2022 Share Posted March 29, 2022 9 minutes ago, Meat said: That’s not how the law works Well, in most of Europe it does work like that. (Just not in the US it seems which is why paparazzi have a job) THEY CALL ME LADY MOP Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lextyr97 19,648 Posted March 29, 2022 Share Posted March 29, 2022 6 hours ago, Juanlittlem said: I mean, that's his work Paparazzis take pictures and people will have to pay/give credit for it, it's always been like that. It should be illegal to take pictures of people and profit off of it without their permission Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.