Oscars will require proof of vaccination

[Teletubby 150,075]

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences will require all guests and nominees to show proof of vaccination against the coronavirus, as well as two negative P.C.R. tests, in order to attend the Oscars this year.

Performers and presenters will have to undergo "rigorous testing," but will not be required to show proof of vaccination.

Mask requirements will also vary depending on where attendees and nominees are sitting – nominees and their guests will be seated in the orchestra and parterre areas of the Dolby Theatre and will not be required to wear face coverings, but will be spaced out more than usual.

The 94th Academy Awards is set to take place at the Dolby Theatre in Los Angeles on March 27. The Dolby Theatre seats roughly 3,320 people, and 2,500 guests are expected at this year's show.
source

[weed 73,926]

coughchella found with no smell in a ditch

Precautions!

[RAMROD 109,709]

Weird rules. Like, if you want to have vaccination proof and mask mandatory event then do it for all guests, why presenters and some areas are excluded? Literall all it takes for the virus to spread is one people, that will cause chain reaction to everyone in the whole room. 

[Dojo 19,365]

3 minutes ago, Teletubby said:

 

Performers and presenters will have to undergo "rigorous testing,"

aka an*l swabs wbk 

Gaga dodged a bullet 

[LOVEDRUG 10,727]

still don't get why two negative tests aren't enough regardless. proof of vax shouldn't be enough to confirm you're safe, pcr testing is the only form of verification that proves you're fine. that way we can let people make their own decisions on vaccination, whilst ensuring we keep tabs on who has the virus and who doesn't.

double jabbed here and had the virus at the start of the month. if everything had 'proof of vax' only as the form of verification, i could've gone out and spread it to thousands.

[TimisaMonster 31,073]

13 minutes ago, Melancholia said:

still don't get why two negative tests aren't enough regardless. proof of vax shouldn't be enough to confirm you're safe, pcr testing is the only form of verification that proves you're fine. that way we can let people make their own decisions on vaccination, whilst ensuring we keep tabs on who has the virus and who doesn't.

double jabbed here and had the virus at the start of the month. if everything had 'proof of vax' only as the form of verification, i could've gone out and spread it to thousands.

This...just cuz you got vaccinated doesn't mean you won't get COVID...

The country and world in general is starting to slowly realize we need to just accept COVID will be around and start thinking of the long term...

So much fear still but these rules make no sense...like someone else said...why not require all to be vaccinated or show proof of a negative test? All it takes is one person...its been 2 years now we should ALL know this lol

[Guest]

will gaga attend? 

[PartySick 160,667]

1 hour ago, Melancholia said:

still don't get why two negative tests aren't enough regardless. proof of vax shouldn't be enough to confirm you're safe, pcr testing is the only form of verification that proves you're fine. that way we can let people make their own decisions on vaccination, whilst ensuring we keep tabs on who has the virus and who doesn't.

double jabbed here and had the virus at the start of the month. if everything had 'proof of vax' only as the form of verification, i could've gone out and spread it to thousands.

 

1 hour ago, TimisaMonster said:

This...just cuz you got vaccinated doesn't mean you won't get COVID...

The country and world in general is starting to slowly realize we need to just accept COVID will be around and start thinking of the long term...

So much fear still but these rules make no sense...like someone else said...why not require all to be vaccinated or show proof of a negative test? All it takes is one person...its been 2 years now we should ALL know this lol

Barring the fact that the vaccine makes it less likely for you to spread covid (you're less likely to develop coughing or sneezing as symptoms and your viral load is much smaller so there's less virus to actually shed) you also generally don't need to be concerned about someone who is vaccinated catching covid.

So by requiring vaccinations, you know everyone in attendance will be fine. Even if covid manages to spread amongst the guests.

[LOVEDRUG 10,727]

6 hours ago, PartySick said:

 

Barring the fact that the vaccine makes it less likely for you to spread covid (you're less likely to develop coughing or sneezing as symptoms and your viral load is much smaller so there's less virus to actually shed) you also generally don't need to be concerned about someone who is vaccinated catching covid.

So by requiring vaccinations, you know everyone in attendance will be fine. Even if covid manages to spread amongst the guests.

or you could just make the entry requirement negative tests and avoid it anyway.

[PartySick 160,667]

43 minutes ago, Melancholia said:

or you could just make the entry requirement negative tests and avoid it anyway.

Eh, you risk false negatives that way