Butters Stotch 5,364 Posted November 22, 2021 Share Posted November 22, 2021 On 11/20/2021 at 11:44 PM, Queen Bitch said: Rittenhouse is innocent. He did nothing wrong. The verdict confirms this. He defended his own life for f*cks sake. It's not about racism and oppression. As I've asked 700 times to different people without getting a straight answer (and I know why lol) what was Kyle Rittenhouse supposed to do? Just lay down and die? What I don't get is why he was on a riot with a huge gun... like, why? If people are rioting and you show up with a huge gun, they are obviously going to feel attacked. I saw the videos and I get the self defense argument, the only thing I can't seem to understand is why he walked through the riot with that huge gun. I'm not questioning anything here, though. I just would like to know if he gave an explanation about this because I'm a lawyer and I'm trying to make sense out of all of this. FIND YOUR FREEDOM IN THE MUSIC Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
YUJIfushiguro 224 Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 13 hours ago, Ziggy said: Well, again, it doesn't sound like you live around here so it isn't much worth arguing the point as you don't really get the "context" of the area, but going into the streets with an assault rifle looks pretty f*cking menacing. We can pretend and choose to believe so many things, but let's be real here: He knew exactly wtf he was doing going into the streets with that weapon and knew what that image was going to attract his way. That is someone seeking violence and who is now claiming self-defense. It wasn't even his business. He was just in the streets. It isn't like a mob came to his business and tried to nab him or something. He was out and about with an assault weapon trying to scare people. Defense does not include actively antagonizing others like this did. He knew he might be shooting people and was prepared to, in fact, sought to do it. Anti-establishment, armed and militarized young men are essentially out trying to LARP their masochistic fantasies. This isn't a little boy defending a business with a gun, this is a young man with fantasies of war and bloodshed, like so many others in the US right now, feeling inspired to live them out. It's a current of male culture and that chord needs to be understood if we're going to have a conversation about this. It's a lot bigger than the particulars of this case, as it always is. This person and so many like him see their country slipping from the hands that preference white maleness and are scared. So they're tightening a vice grip on that. In this case, Rittenhouse clearly had every intention to use that weapon to threaten people and got just that. His response *now* is clear indicator that he was in over his head and didn't understand the full weight and chaos of what being in that spot entailed. Again, this is a fantasy scenario of so many in these circles right now, but very few are actually equipped to handle the stress of being in it once they are (take a watch of the video and that is clear imo). So the question becomes, how do you punish someone who was quite obviously delusional to the umpteenth degree, but still went into a space with the specific intent to threaten people with horrible violence? Is that murder? Manslaughter? It could be many things, but I don't believe for a moment that it was anything even relatively close to self-defense as the only thing he defended was a bad decision after knowing very well what he was getting into bringing that weapon there. Sure, Wisconsin is open carry, but Rittenhouse is from Illinois and also underage and also it wasn't his weapon lol Ask yourself if he'd have been in that situation if he hadn't been walking around with the assault rifle and I think that can answer much of the issues surrounding this case. I personally don't think you can claim self-defense when there was clear intent you were courting violence. That shows either a terrifyingly level of naivete, privileged delusion, or both. I completely agree with you now tbh I've got admit I was naïve in my first responses and hadn't really looked at the "context" of the area as you put it. I still probably don't understand the full circumstance as your right I don't live in the area. The past day or so I have actually tried to get a better perspective though. As in I had a proper look into it rather then just commenting on the shallow details of what I thought the issue was about . I feel embarrassed about defending his verdict and like you I don't know if I could call it murder or manslaughter or whatever due to the whole fantasy like scenario / delusion this kid has put himself in. Regardless there should be some sort of punishment and there's no way this should simply be dismissed as self defence. Thanks for going to the time to try and educate me abit on this and sorry for commenting on this without getting the full perspective first. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
YUJIfushiguro 224 Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 plz ignore this im stupid and quoted myself instead of editing it somehow and dunno how to delete Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziggy 11,792 Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 17 hours ago, YUJIfushiguro said: I completely agree with you now tbh I've got admit I was naïve in my first responses and hadn't really looked at the "context" of the area as you put it. I still probably don't understand the full circumstance as your right I don't live in the area. The past day or so I have actually tried to get a better perspective though. As in I had a proper look into it rather then just commenting on the shallow details of what I thought the issue was about . I feel embarrassed about defending his verdict and like you I don't know if I could call it murder or manslaughter or whatever due to the whole fantasy like scenario / delusion this kid has put himself in. Regardless there should be some sort of punishment and there's no way this should simply be dismissed as self defence. Thanks for going to the time to try and educate me abit on this and sorry for commenting on this without getting the full perspective first. Oh girl no you’re good; j’adore an open dialogue about this stuff. Despite what some might say, it’s really really complex! Tbh I think the only way to think about it is through open discussion so I appreciate you wanting to do that in the first place Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.