Meat 18,962 Posted November 17, 2021 Share Posted November 17, 2021 Not a movie critic but we still love ha Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meat 18,962 Posted November 17, 2021 Share Posted November 17, 2021 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehanyo 4,251 Posted November 17, 2021 Share Posted November 17, 2021 Here's one of those bad ones you all have been craving. If you read the replies, you will see he is chummy with all the other haters of the film, as they are all making fun of LMs... thankfully he's a nobody that doesn't vote for anything or count for RT. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meat 18,962 Posted November 17, 2021 Share Posted November 17, 2021 13 minutes ago, thehanyo said: Here's one of those bad ones you all have been craving. If you read the replies, you will see he is chummy with all the other haters of the film, as they are all making fun of LMs... thankfully he's a nobody that doesn't vote for anything or count for RT. And even he said “it’s well acted” Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodandsmile 10,104 Posted November 17, 2021 Share Posted November 17, 2021 14 minutes ago, thehanyo said: you will see he is chummy with all the other haters of the film, as they are all making fun of LMs they love the attention and want to get attacked by them... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meat 18,962 Posted November 17, 2021 Share Posted November 17, 2021 SAG voter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrewPa 3,762 Posted November 17, 2021 Share Posted November 17, 2021 2 hours ago, thehanyo said: Here's one of those bad ones you all have been craving. If you read the replies, you will see he is chummy with all the other haters of the film, as they are all making fun of LMs... thankfully he's a nobody that doesn't vote for anything or count for RT. That's exactly what I was talking about: There is no argument in favour of its rejection, this is the kind of commentary you can write for any film you don't like, from Citizen Kane to a Marvel film. On what is a judgement like "A total Catastrophe" based? Does it refer to a technical aspect or rather to the content, and in both cases, might we have a hint, a detail that allows us to understand not so much the quality of the film, but the idea of cinema of the person writing it? - A badly shot film? I would be surprised - An incoherent and poorly written script? I'm surprised no one else noticed this. - Too trashy content and/or dialogue? Maybe, but even the writer contradicts himself on this (first he talks about total catastrophe and then he says he enjoyed the camp moments, so he himself excludes that one aspect that would have supported his criticism) At least judgements like "the actors each look like they're in a different film, the film has scenes of unintentional ridicule, the last part is less well written, the editing is disappointing" are based on something. Too easy to write "a total disaster, it was a torture for 2 and a half hours I wouldn't recommend such torment to anyone" if you don't argue. (Let alone the use of the term "A mess" which is the Internet Animals' favorite word when they want to shade something without elaborating too much) I'm a real Fire CRRRACKERRR Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehanyo 4,251 Posted November 17, 2021 Share Posted November 17, 2021 3 minutes ago, DrewPa said: (Let alone the use of the term "A mess" which is the Interner animals' favorite word when they want to shade something without elaborating too much) I agree, but also to be fair-- a lot of people are saying it's camp, but many others are saying it's too serious, etc... that sounds like a tonal mess to me haha. But that could just be that these types of films are not for everyone. Some people need paint-by-numbers movies that fit easily into a neat little box. This clearly ain't that kinda film. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jollibee 3,179 Posted November 17, 2021 Share Posted November 17, 2021 The Academy is loving this. The press, engagement, and hype that it will brinf if the BA dildo is between Kristen and Gaga. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrewPa 3,762 Posted November 17, 2021 Share Posted November 17, 2021 2 minutes ago, thehanyo said: I agree, but also to be fair-- a lot of people are saying it's camp, but many others are saying it's too serious, etc... that sounds like a tonal mess to me haha. But that could just be that these types of films are not for everyone. Some people need paint-by-numbers movies that fit easily into a neat little box. This clearly ain't that kinda film. well, in this case half Pedro Almodovar's filmography, "Muriel's Wedding" and so on are a "Total mess" I'm a real Fire CRRRACKERRR Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehanyo 4,251 Posted November 17, 2021 Share Posted November 17, 2021 14 minutes ago, Jollibee said: The Academy is loving this. The press, engagement, and hype that it will brinf if the BA dildo is between Kristen and Gaga. Girl what did you mean by this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
franminervini 16,812 Posted November 17, 2021 Share Posted November 17, 2021 Have you checked the Charts Thread today?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
franminervini 16,812 Posted November 17, 2021 Share Posted November 17, 2021 Have you checked the Charts Thread today?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jollibee 3,179 Posted November 17, 2021 Share Posted November 17, 2021 41 minutes ago, thehanyo said: Girl what did you mean by this. They called the statue as dildo too. Lol. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehanyo 4,251 Posted November 17, 2021 Share Posted November 17, 2021 1 minute ago, Jollibee said: They called the statue as dildo too. Lol. omg i've never heard that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.