Jump to content
lgbt

"No Kink At Pride" Exposed As Anti Gay Right Wing Agenda


RAMROD

Featured Posts

HuffsAhoy
4 minutes ago, Phlop said:

Im not saying all kink shouldn’t be allowed, but if it’s bordering indecent public exposure then yes.

There is a distinct difference between expressing some kink (like wearing leather or a pup hood) and literal screwing in the streets. No one here will disagree with that :giggle: I think this conversation would be more beneficial if we stop associating "kink" (in its general term) with the actual act of sex. I agree that public sex is indecent and something even I, despite my open attitudes towards sex, would not be comfy with. 

You remind me that it's such a wonderful thing to love.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Enigma

Just because the right is using an argument to further their bullshit and apply it to all gay sex doesn’t make the initial argument invalid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

RAMROD
1 minute ago, Enigma said:

Just because the right is using an argument to further their bullshit and apply it to all gay sex doesn’t make the initial argument invalid.

 

OK Boomers :billie:

(ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ✧*:・゚ ᶠʳᵒⁿᵗ ᵗᵒʷᵃʳᵈ ᵉⁿᵉᵐʸ (*´艸`*) ♡♡♡
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • PartySick locked this topic

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...