Adelita 3,177 Posted April 14, 2021 Share Posted April 14, 2021 Yes, the original version. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FREEPALESTINE 302 Posted April 14, 2021 Share Posted April 14, 2021 one of her best song just sayin Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adelita 3,177 Posted April 14, 2021 Share Posted April 14, 2021 This song will never be the same without R. Kelly, no matter who he is, sorry for the false moralist. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FfFfFfFF 54,383 Posted April 14, 2021 Share Posted April 14, 2021 No. In light of everything that hapened recently, a new outtake should take its place. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIM820 1,770 Posted April 14, 2021 Share Posted April 14, 2021 Yes because I love it but also no if R Smelly still profits. If it helps though, he will most likely never get his hands on the money himself because he may go to prison for the rest of his life OR it’s all being spent on his legal fees! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
insight 2,428 Posted April 14, 2021 Share Posted April 14, 2021 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HausOfAntonio 7,995 Posted April 14, 2021 Share Posted April 14, 2021 DWUW solo and Xtina versions could be a way for Gaga to reclaim the powerlessness she felt at that time. But I would never want her to feel uncomfortable with releasing it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
insight 2,428 Posted April 14, 2021 Share Posted April 14, 2021 He profits because she included him. Who the hell in her team gave the green light to this collab? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage 1,752 Posted April 14, 2021 Share Posted April 14, 2021 1 hour ago, jacs vs looser said: Y'all need to understand that Gaga would be seen as hypocrite and rightfully so, for deleting the R Kelly version but still helping him get royalties by adding the Christina or solo versions. I wonder if she could re-record it! (Epic Taylor’s Version style! ) would that get around him profiting? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LG2008 3,676 Posted April 14, 2021 Share Posted April 14, 2021 I need to know why R. Kelly makes profit from a version in which he's not included... Did he has writing credits on the solo version? I thought he wrote just his verse... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Child 18,997 Posted April 14, 2021 Share Posted April 14, 2021 Guys if the Xtina version is still up, R.Kelly surely doesn’t get any credit from it so she can just put the solo version on it cause the album lacks something now and going from MANiCURE to ARTPOP feels weird. ‘If religion be the cause of disunity, then irreligion is surely to be preferred.’ ‘Abdu’l-Bahá Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chromatislaps 34,792 Posted April 14, 2021 Share Posted April 14, 2021 49 minutes ago, ChicaSkas said: Its soooo difficult. It's my favorite song on ARTPOP. I've even made an album just for myself of that actual entire song in 20 different imaginings. Also when I met Paul, he told me it was his fave song on the album too. That being said, I voted no, because Gaga removed it from her catalog for a reason. She should get another male lead singer to cover the male parts, and rerelease it, so we have both a female and male counterpart. (female being Christina Aguilera's version). I think if she changed the lyrics or made a new song out of it, R Kelly's writing credits would be anulled. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReplayBoss 179 Posted April 14, 2021 Share Posted April 14, 2021 I know a lot of people are saying that R.Kelly has songwriting credits, but the Xtina version is still up for purchase. Does that mean he's still getting royalties from it? If not, why not just replace it with that version on the album? DWUW is such a unique song and it feels weird not having it on ARTPOP. The scars on my mind are on replay, r-replay Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChicaSkas 22,404 Posted April 14, 2021 Share Posted April 14, 2021 51 minutes ago, Anderson123 said: Yeah it wouldn't make sense to add it back after the statement she released, it'd just stir the pot. It's also my favorite song from the album, they did an amazing job on it and the album does feel like it's lacking something and that's because it had so much potential. I found that album I made back in 2013. If you want to dl it! this album was on repeat for me for months! https://mega.nz/file/3kpzwS7J#GB8ZzkZIQKRMEL8amn0sDVxT9_4gUd_XGD7GjJJ2530 Do YOU own the 4' by 6' Perfect Illusion promo Poster? Will pay you for it. Pic: http://i.imgur.com/UWuzumk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke78619 23,055 Posted April 14, 2021 Share Posted April 14, 2021 It’s only a matter of time before Jewels n Drugs gets removed because of TI tbh everyone already has the song if they’ve purchased the album and there’s ways of finding it online to download, so I wouldn’t put it back on the album in any form replace it with a cute outtake would be nice but seeing as that outtake is not a part of the original album, it makes sense as to why they wouldn’t replace it insta: good_lukeing | I have nothing else to promote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.