Jump to content
Mayhem Requiem
politics

Buttigieg open to taxing drivers by the mile


Morphine Prince

Featured Posts

StarstruckIllusion

This is such a bad idea. Wow. Poorer people are more likely to drive longer distances to work, essentially a new tax on the lower class. God he’s so bad at this. You can tell he’s in that position bc of political favours and nothing else

Pete please just build the trains you previously talked about...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply
MJHolland
6 minutes ago, HuffsAhoy said:

Of course you would :yennefer: Just admit you hate the rural working class already. This would utterly KILL them. It sickens me there are people like you who get off on taxing the poor to death. 

They already pay a gas tax :smh: PB literally likened a mileage tax to replace that...

Rural Americans and ppl who can’t afford to buy electric cars are now paying a bigger share of driving taxes bc of the transition to electric. This could restore it to being more equitable. 

I’m not particularly a fan of this just to be clear, and it think it would turn voters off. But so would any tax, and taxing the absolute richest among us is still a finite resource despite what the far left think. Biden has to come up with NEW tax revenue to pay for the missive “Build Back Better” infrastructure they’re getting ready to introduce. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HuffsAhoy
1 minute ago, bionic said:

Am I supposed to sell my house, pull my kid out of daycare, get my partner to find a new job etc just so I can move to a major city and succumb to the will of capitalism? 

According to the elite left, it's a sacrifice you need to make; that's what you get for choosing to live and affordable life  :trollga: 

You remind me that it's such a wonderful thing to love.
Link to post
Share on other sites

bionic
2 minutes ago, StarstruckIllusion said:

This is such a bad idea. Wow. You can tell he’s in that position bc of political favours 

We know that Obama promised Pete a job if he dropped out of the race, Elizabeth Warren got a similar offer and said no :laughga: 

IDK how Pete is doing in this position but this policy is not it

Link to post
Share on other sites

StarstruckIllusion
Just now, bionic said:

We know that Obama promised Pete a job if he dropped out of the race, Elizabeth Warren got a similar offer and said no:toofunny: 

IDK how Pete is doing in this position but this policy is not it

Okay but is he surrounded by experts? Bad ideas like this should be kept to the grave... like not him saying this on camera welp 

Link to post
Share on other sites

MJHolland
1 minute ago, bionic said:

We know that Obama promised Pete a job if he dropped out of the race, Elizabeth Warren got a similar offer and said no :laughga: 

IDK how Pete is doing in this position but this policy is not it

A reporter asked him a question and he gave a 10 second answer... it’s a far cry from an actual “policy” lol 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HuffsAhoy
3 minutes ago, MJHolland said:

Rural Americans and ppl who can afford to buy electric cars

Rural Americans and electric car is the biggest oxymoron I think I've every seen :lmao: Most can barely afford to pay rent/mortgage; you think they're peeing away money on an electric car :lmao::lmao:

You remind me that it's such a wonderful thing to love.
Link to post
Share on other sites

bionic
1 minute ago, StarstruckIllusion said:

Okay but is he surrounded by experts? Bad ideas like this should be kept to the grave... like not him saying this on camera welp 

I trust that this will get parked once the experts get their hands on it, but its an example of what the political class really think and believe. A saying the quiet bit out loud moment

Link to post
Share on other sites

MJHolland
Just now, StarstruckIllusion said:

Okay but is he surrounded by experts? Bad ideas like this should be kept to the grave... like not him saying this on camera welp 

He’s actually experienced in transportation though? 
 

I used to live in South Bend, IN during and after the time Pete was mayor and he passed massive infrastructure projects to revolutionize public transportation for our medium-sized industrial midwest city.... exactly the kind of city and voters people are bashing Pete for not understanding somehow :smh:

Someone in here calling him an urban elite is just hilarious 

Link to post
Share on other sites

FATCAT
10 minutes ago, HuffsAhoy said:

Of course you would :yennefer: Just admit you hate the rural working class already. This would utterly KILL them. It sickens me there are people like you who get off on taxing the poor to death. 

 

10 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said:

Using the road more isn’t always a choice. 

Two concepts: 

Red-lining

Gentrification 

 

If they replaced the gas tax, gas prices would plummet. Like a whole $1 of the gas price is tax right now. We nix that, no one will care come tax season that they have to pay proportionally instead of gallon by gallon.

This kitten over here (meow)
Link to post
Share on other sites

MJHolland
3 minutes ago, HuffsAhoy said:

Rural Americans and electric car is the biggest oxymoron I think I've every seen :lmao: Most can barely afford to pay rent/mortgage; you think they're peeing away money on an electric car :lmao::lmao:

I edited my post before you replied chile :awkney:

“can” was a typo it should’ve read “can’t” .... but you would’ve realized that yourself if you deployed basic reading comprehsension clues :lmao:

Link to post
Share on other sites

PartySick
8 minutes ago, MJHolland said:

They already pay a gas tax :smh: PB literally likened a mileage tax to replace that...

How much is that anyway? And what does the gas tax revenue go towards? If it's a direct replacement and the taxes already go towards infrastructure then what would be the point of making an unpopular move like this? I'm just trying to understand what we'd gain from this tbh.

The most interesting threads always get made when I'm at work and can't dive into stuff :yennefer:

Whimsical bitch
Link to post
Share on other sites

HuffsAhoy
Just now, MJHolland said:

“can” was a typo it should’ve read “can’t” .... but you would’ve realized that yourself if you deployed basic reading comprehsension clues :lmao:

Sweetie, my comprehension is leaps and bounds ahead of yours because I'm not blind enough to fall for this façade the elite left is trying to pull over the eyes of the American people.

And for the record it's spelled comprehension not 'comprehsension' :kiss:

You remind me that it's such a wonderful thing to love.
Link to post
Share on other sites

bionic
2 minutes ago, PartySick said:

How much is that anyway? And what does the gas tax revenue go towards? If it's a direct replacement and the taxes already go towards infrastructure then what would be the point of making an unpopular move like this? I'm just trying to understand what we'd gain from this tbh.

The most interesting threads always get made when I'm at work and can't dive into stuff :yennefer:

The United States federal excise tax on gasoline is 18.4 cents per gallon and 24.4 cents per gallon for diesel fuel. On average, as of April 2019, state and local taxes and fees add 34.24 cents to gasoline and 35.89 cents to diesel, for a total US volume-weighted average fuel tax of 52.64 cents per gallon for gas and 60.29 cents per gallon for diesel

Generally this income is added to the generic revenue section– not ringfenced for a specific fund (i.e. road maintenance). I think federally about 50% is 'used' for transport projects

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_taxes_in_the_United_States

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...