JusKeepBreathin 19,311 Posted November 8, 2020 Share Posted November 8, 2020 1 minute ago, Chromatican said: Joe Biden ran in 1988 and 2008. He is also a two time loser. I don’t think we need to run Bernie again, but we DO need to combat the rise of Trumpism with a left-wing populist who is in the same vein as Bernie. We literally had Elizabeth running in the same year and y'all called her a snake. Bernie hardcore followers were personality stans. They weren't progressives. Imagine calling a woman a snake and still claiming to be a progressive. Whatever. "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." -Martin Luther King Jr. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KORG 4,756 Posted November 8, 2020 Share Posted November 8, 2020 16 minutes ago, Chromatican said: Joe Biden ran in 1988 and 2008. He is also a two time loser. I don’t think we need to run Bernie again, but we DO need to combat the rise of Trumpism with a left-wing populist who is in the same vein as Bernie. You cant win an election with a polarising figure that terrifies republicans. Theyre not intelligent and dont have thought processes like the rest of us. You win an election by being appealing to both sides. A hard-core lefty is never going to win. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chromatican 4,046 Posted November 8, 2020 Share Posted November 8, 2020 15 minutes ago, JusKeepBreathin said: We literally had Elizabeth running in the same year and y'all called her a snake. Bernie hardcore followers were personality stans. They weren't progressives. Imagine calling a woman a snake and still claiming to be a progressive. Whatever. You really don’t think Bernie stans would get behind Nina Turner or AOC? This one would. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chromatican 4,046 Posted November 8, 2020 Share Posted November 8, 2020 1 minute ago, KORG said: You cant win an election with a polarising figure that terrifies republicans. Theyre not intelligent and dont have thought processes like the rest of us. You win an election by being appealing to both sides. A hard-core lefty is never going to win. NO! We get less republicans to vote Biden than in 2016!!!!! The Lincoln Project was an utter failure. The Biden Republican is as rare as can be. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KORG 4,756 Posted November 8, 2020 Share Posted November 8, 2020 1 minute ago, Chromatican said: NO! We get less republicans to vote Biden than in 2016!!!!! The Lincoln Project was an utter failure. The Biden Republican is as rare as can be. Simply not true. You have no data to show this to be factual. New voters registered and people moved from rep to dem or 3rd party, but nobody knows at this point which way they voted previously. All we know is that the geography of the vote for Biden worked in our favour. Look at the UK. We had the choice of Boris the buffoon or our Bernie, Jeremy Corbin. Jeremy was the clear logical vote but because he was a hard-core lefty he alienated the uneducated working class & the top-earning citizens. That lost him the election against Bojo the clown. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gagaloo911 12,959 Posted November 8, 2020 Share Posted November 8, 2020 The neoliberals in here screaming about how we need to be more conservative eventhough MORE Republicans voted for Trump this time than in 2016 (93% vs 90%). Not to mention Trump received MORE votes this time than last time too. That means Republicans are as extreme and radicalized as Trump and the far-right, they're not moderates The notion we need to be more Republican to win is absolutely, positively DELUSIONAL as fvck when you LOOK AT THE FACTS! If people want a Republican, why would they vote for a fake, Republican-lite Democrat when they can have the real thing? Stop being delusional and fess up. It's not happening, Republicans WHOLESALE REJECT Democrats every single time and y'all can get it through your thick skulls. Continuing to run Republican-lite Democrats is a failing, LOSER strategy and is going to get the Dems completely obliterated in the future as the Democratic base gets sick and tired of Dems alienating them to get so-called Republican moderates who actually don't exist and who will NEVER vote for a Democrat. Smarten up, learn from your mistakes, and stop being unbearable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chromatican 4,046 Posted November 8, 2020 Share Posted November 8, 2020 39 minutes ago, KORG said: Simply not true. You have no data to show this to be factual. New voters registered and people moved from rep to dem or 3rd party, but nobody knows at this point which way they voted previously. All we know is that the geography of the vote for Biden worked in our favour. Look at the UK. We had the choice of Boris the buffoon or our Bernie, Jeremy Corbin. Jeremy was the clear logical vote but because he was a hard-core lefty he alienated the uneducated working class & the top-earning citizens. That lost him the election against Bojo the clown. The US is not the UK. We have a two party system here and if people want a Republican they can have one, there’s no need for a diet Republican Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bionic 50,111 Posted November 8, 2020 Share Posted November 8, 2020 1 hour ago, Chromatican said: Joe Biden ran in 1988 and 2008. He is also a two time loser. I don’t think we need to run Bernie again, but we DO need to combat the rise of Trumpism with a left-wing populist who is in the same vein as Bernie. Neither of those campaigns was as major as Bernie's two Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarahb 17,188 Posted November 8, 2020 Share Posted November 8, 2020 Do you feel him sir? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chromatican 4,046 Posted November 8, 2020 Share Posted November 8, 2020 7 minutes ago, bionic said: Neither of those campaigns was as major as Bernie's two Why are you bashing Bernie? He campaigned HARD for Joe. And he got screwed over by Obama this time around. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bionic 50,111 Posted November 8, 2020 Share Posted November 8, 2020 2 minutes ago, Chromatican said: Why are you bashing Bernie? He campaigned HARD for Joe. And he got screwed over by Obama this time around. Girl all I said was that Bernie running a third doomed primary campaign would not be good optics. He's not immune to criticism! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chromatican 4,046 Posted November 8, 2020 Share Posted November 8, 2020 1 minute ago, bionic said: Girl all I said was that Bernie running a third doomed primary campaign would not be good optics. He's not immune to criticism! Well not now of course. By 2024 he, along with Joe Biden who is the same age will be far too old to run again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bionic 50,111 Posted November 8, 2020 Share Posted November 8, 2020 Just now, Chromatican said: Well not now of course. By 2024 he, along with Joe Biden who is the same age will be far too old to run again. Fully agree. Time for new blood Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
REALITY 80,162 Posted November 8, 2020 Share Posted November 8, 2020 Two things about running more progressive candidates: #1.) I think in order for people to say "running a progressive candidate is 100% the wrong thing to do," we first need to get a progressive candidate on the Democratic ticket On paper, Biden was the perfect candidate to run: he's been in politics for a long time; he was the VP for 8 years, which meant he had a lot of name recognition; and he was a moderate, which theoretically would help him gain potentially more Independent and Republican votes. He's probably going to end up with 306 electoral college votes, which is good, but he narrowly won states like PA, MI, WI, and GA which all gave him the edge. People may say that having a progressive alienates others, but we don't really know that for sure until we actually have a progressive on the Democratic ticket. Bernie was doing fine in the primaries—better than fine actually—until Biden won SC, and then every other moderate running backed him. We can speculate all we want, but until a day like that happens, it's just that: speculation. #2.) We also need to see what's going to happen these next 4 years. Perhaps Biden will be more progressive than we realized, considering just how far right Trump has been. Perhaps he'll put progressives in his cabinet and in powerful positions. There's a lot that could happen these next 4 years. Before talking about 2024 at all, we should focus on what we can do during this time. 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔪𝔬𝔫𝔰𝔱𝔢𝔯 𝔱𝔬𝔯𝔢 𝔞𝔴𝔞𝔶 𝔦𝔱𝔰 𝔪𝔞𝔰𝔨 𝔞𝔫𝔡...𝔦𝔱𝔰 𝔣𝔞𝔠𝔢 𝔴𝔞𝔰 𝔪𝔦𝔫𝔢. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
palma 8,909 Posted November 8, 2020 Share Posted November 8, 2020 Tbh if I were American and registered Democrat, I'd be all in for a 3rd run by Bernie. I wouldn't expect him to get the ticket and wouldn't b*tch about it later but I would thank him for it since it'd most likely push center Democrats into adapting a more progressive agenda to get Bernie's base. Then again, Bernie is getting older each day and I think the guy deserves some peace for all he done for Americans. It's baffling how similar US politics has gotten to one in my own country so I don't see any reason to not share this: pandering to right DOES NOT work for center-left parties. It's like buying iPhone se when you have means to get the pro max. If you want a "right-wing" president, you wouldn't vote for the one that all the LGBTI+, immigrants and POC vote for. Same thing happened over here and most Left-wingers stayed home, refusing to vote for a guy with a fundamentalist statements in his past. The funniest part was, after the elections he ditched the opposition party and became an MP for the authoritarian government Is there some reason my LG7 isn't here? Has she died or something? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.