Magui 2,628 Posted October 1, 2020 Share Posted October 1, 2020 Stunning!!! . I actually use blush 😊. The photos we get from these ads are gorgeous. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chromatica Island 8,517 Posted October 1, 2020 Share Posted October 1, 2020 God shes beautiful, I will never understand those who say shes ugly, they're blind. Any/All Pronouns, Genderfluid🏳⚧ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chromatica Island 8,517 Posted October 1, 2020 Share Posted October 1, 2020 I just bought my months worth of makeup today, so maybe next month, Haus labs is kind of pricey, so maybe one day I will buy her products. Any/All Pronouns, Genderfluid🏳⚧ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kattys 4,319 Posted October 1, 2020 Share Posted October 1, 2020 3 hours ago, Daylight Jokers said: Are you telling me this packaging: Doesn't look cheap? I have Naked Honey palette and the packaging is super cool, plus wide mirror inside is super useful. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beluga Gagaviar 1 10 Posted October 1, 2020 Share Posted October 1, 2020 Me: Gaga would you marry me? Gaga: I'm gonna marry the night Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chromatica Island 8,517 Posted October 1, 2020 Share Posted October 1, 2020 Just now, Kattys said: I have Naked Honey palette and the packaging is super cool, plus wide mirror inside is super useful. I have the Basics, Smokey, Cherry, and Ultraviolet, I love Urban Decay Palettes, the brushes are great too! Any/All Pronouns, Genderfluid🏳⚧ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShayCristoforo 10,607 Posted October 1, 2020 Share Posted October 1, 2020 This might actually pop off. Good luck to ha! Get the pinot ready, because it's turtle time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 1, 2020 Share Posted October 1, 2020 Haus Lab? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchwineLove 1,374 Posted October 1, 2020 Share Posted October 1, 2020 She's serving Aphrodite Lady realness Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedOneKonvictGaga 217 Posted October 1, 2020 Share Posted October 1, 2020 5 hours ago, MonsterPawPR said: Oh my gaga "Lavoratories" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vyniildisk 12,689 Posted October 1, 2020 Share Posted October 1, 2020 3 hours ago, Enigma said: The biggest issue with this brand is the complete lack of artistic vision, and that can't be blamed on it being a "start up" since it basically costs nothing to make good artistic decisions tho, and even then the start up argument makes little sense when the founder is a millionaire. The brand logo? Blandest logo in the history of logos. Arial-ish in white on solid black. Yikes. The packaging? The same Arial aesthetic, nearly everything is solid black, no special shape. Lifeless. And cheap too : it's always cardboard or cheap plastic. The products? Generic colour story, we had to complain for a year for edgy colours to be added by the drop. Weird choices of names, whether it be for the palettes, glam attacks, eyeshadow shades... that's a lesser issue, but the shade names of a palette usually convey its vision, whereas here they're random words or song names. Perpetuates the "cheap celebrity side-gig" vibe of it all. And "Glam Room Number 1" is the best they could have found for their 1st palette launch?! At this point just rename it "No Name Cosmetics" The ads? Mostly basic. The most interesting they got was at launch, with the Babylon instrumental ads, but even then it was very "calling ourselves avant-garde despite there being very little innovation". Since then the ads have just been plain Jane. Look at the new one : it's her looking pretty, gorgeous even, but that's it. The brand vision is so muddy... It's always that weird "be kind" thing which has absolutely nothing to do with makeup, and it seems like the whole thing's goal is messy makeup... Which looked acceptable when Kesha did it, but here it's just Sarah showing very little skill and Gaga doing her makeup herself and ending up with a muddy mess on her eyes most times than not. Sorry for being so harsh but I think this brand is clownery, and I don't feel bad being vocal about it considering it's just some Amazon-affiliated cash grab for some billionaire shareholders. I agree with every single one of your points but i have come to the conclussion that thye might not have the budget to go hard and in full force with these brand? I think is mostly a little company with very few investors Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmoment 292 Posted October 1, 2020 Share Posted October 1, 2020 Someone is just obsessed with complaining all of the things even there is lots of improvement of packaging and visual presentation. Just accept you don't like it and leave here is ok Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
franminervini 16,982 Posted October 1, 2020 Share Posted October 1, 2020 OMG SHE LOOKS STUNNING MERMAID GODDESS QUEEN STEP ON ME Have you checked the Charts Thread today?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enigma 7,182 Posted October 1, 2020 Share Posted October 1, 2020 52 minutes ago, Dulo Peep said: I agree with every single one of your points but i have come to the conclussion that thye might not have the budget to go hard and in full force with these brand? I think is mostly a little company with very few investors I mean a lot of small brands who aren't back by a multimillionaire pop star are able to have more interesting visuals, products and packaging. They definitely did not lack ressources. I think the brand lacks effort. The fact it's on Amazon gives me the impression that it was just their way of having an "Amazon beauty" brand with slight creative liberty to Gaga, but no way to truly be out there. Despite everything that has been said about it, I'm nearly convinced that this is more of a Tudor watch situation than a The Fame situation, meaning they just put her face on a brand and she had very little actual input or interest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vyniildisk 12,689 Posted October 1, 2020 Share Posted October 1, 2020 6 minutes ago, Enigma said: I mean a lot of small brands who aren't back by a multimillionaire pop star are able to have more interesting visuals, products and packaging. They definitely did not lack ressources. I think the brand lacks effort. The fact it's on Amazon gives me the impression that it was just their way of having an "Amazon beauty" brand with slight creative liberty to Gaga, but no way to truly be out there. Despite everything that has been said about it, I'm nearly convinced that this is more of a Tudor watch situation than a The Fame situation, meaning they just put her face on a brand and she had very little actual input or interest. To have more interesting visuals, products and packaging they def need a hardcore team of advisors and developers and way more resources. I doubt Gaga wich is the wealthiest one of the investor would risky aalot of money, she is prob playing it safe. The thing is, a small group of people like Gaga and some of her friends are not enought to develope a monster like this. It requieres a lot of effort. They are probably trying to make the most money with the smallest effort too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.