Is there really nothing we can do about Slant/Sal Cinquemani?

[YourEvilTwin 1,379]

It's ludicrous how a prestige publication like Slant has allowed a notorious Madonna stan to hijack their magazine to execute his own agenda at the expense of their integrity and reputation for so long. Are they simply unaware? Should we start a Twitter campaign or something?

[JazzGa 14,621]

Nah, we should just get over it and enjoy Chromatica 

[Bubblegum Bitch 18,934]

The best thing we can do is just ignore this attention seeking kids. 

[Sepsami 18,887]

Just now, YourEvilTwin said:

It's ludicrous how a prestige publication like Slant has allowed a notorious Madonna stan to hijack their magazine to execute his own agenda at the expense of their integrity and reputation for so long. Are they simply unaware? Should we start a Twitter campaign or something?

Who cares what he says if the rest of the world is boppin? What we should really be doing is streaming the album sweaty!  

[YourEvilTwin 1,379]

Just now, Trillion Reasons said:

The best thing we can do is just ignore this attention seeking kids. 

We can ignore them on Twitter, but Slant is a respectable publication that actually has influence in the industry. Not to mention the freaking Metascore. This is not just you run of the mill Madgetard antics anymore.

[Queen Bitch 10,513]

It seems kinda irrelevant that he's a Madonna stan if you ask me. 

Also it's one bad review. It's not like it's gonna ruin the reputation of the album.

[Creyk 17,817]

You can e-mail metacritic.com, but only with legit receipts. The swifties did this back in the day, when there were inaccuracies in the metacritic database about the scores of some critic ratings of Taylor's earlier albums, they e-mailed the people of metacritic and they actually heightened their score where a lower score was added into the database. They do listen.

[MonsterVlad 1,777]

Of cause we can! This what we should do: ignore it, forget it, don't give them any attention at all. Okay? Love 

[ice bear 1]

sis most madonna stans are little monsters too... that's an arbitrary detail

[Schwerk 7,246]

Save the room on social media for there are bigger battles to fight right now. 

 

[REALITY 76,604]

One review isn't the end of the world. Is it sad that people out there don't like this album? Yeah, but oh well  Keep dancing to Chromatica, darling!

[NewUsername 11,405]

I think you're giving it too much importance.
If it's REALLY an extremely biased reporter with a clear goal of discrediting her or something and we have proof, then yeah, you can mail Metacritic maybe. If not, just let it go. Not everybody can like everything, this goes for lots of thing, not just a Lady Gaga album.

[FfFfFfFF 55,902]

3 minutes ago, Creyk said:

You can e-mail metacritic.com, but only with legit receipts. The swifties did this back in the day, when there were inaccuracies in the metacritic database about the scores of some critic ratings of Taylor's earlier albums, they e-mailed the people of metacritic and they actually heightened their score where a lower score was added into the database. They do listen.

This. After a while they should raise eyebrows and put two and two together. Just checked and they gave ASIB and Joanne also a 50 and a 40 to C2C. They are biased.

[BleepBloop 10,316]

Is that the "butts" review?

[venusfly 17,885]

Slant hasn’t written a single nice article about her in her whole career, it’s just one publication (and a small one at that). Ignore them