Brainiac 11,171 Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 Just now, Florin said: With how much? Idk the final numbers yet. But with 84% reporting, we're at 250,000. Total turnout in 2016 was 250,000. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leoj305 3,774 Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 Pete is the Obama/Hilary Clinton of this era. good luck with beating Pete who is backed by the DNC. bernie needs to beat him to actually have traction. I think he has a shot and a major civil war ahead if he wins the DNC nomination. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chromatica 7,042 Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 1 minute ago, Morphine Prince said: Because he claimed victory with no results out and went on a victory tour afterwards and there was controversy with errors, the app, money etc. A lot of those claims, especially in the magnitude of attention they received, were largely a symptom of Pete performing better than Sanders in the caucus. Even so, there was nothing wrong with arguments about the integrity of the caucus. I was referring more to people calling him a "rat." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sethrb101 4,523 Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 2 minutes ago, Azor Ahai said: NBC calling it for Sanders 7 delegates projected. Only 7? Looks like NYT has him and Buttigieg at 9 each Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brainiac 11,171 Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 1 minute ago, Leoj305 said: Pete is the Obama/Hilary Clinton of this era. good luck with beating Pete who is backed by the DNC. bernie needs to beat him to actually have traction. I think he has a shot and a major civil war ahead if he wins the DNC nomination. He needs to poll better than 2% with African Americans to be ANYTHING like Obama/Hillary. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azor Ahai 18,861 Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 Just now, sethrb101 said: Only 7? Looks like NYT has him and Buttigieg at 9 each That's what it says Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JusKeepBreathin 19,311 Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 1 minute ago, Leoj305 said: Pete is the Obama/Hilary Clinton of this era. good luck with beating Pete who is backed by the DNC. bernie needs to beat him to actually have traction. I think he has a shot and a major civil war ahead if he wins the DNC nomination. Ok girl. Biden who actually was in the Obama administration is losing. This whole DNC fantasy monster needs to end. It's just divisiveness. "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." -Martin Luther King Jr. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Married the Night 3,955 Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 11 minutes ago, derpmonster said: Moderates have literally the majority of candidates running Dem. please spare us the "moderates have it bad" narrative especially with Dems. We haven't had a single left wing candidate or president in a long time. We have had far right and moderates. So please. The people who are disgruntled aren't the moderates. There's Pete, Amy, Biden, and countless others for them. When the media tells you that based on research and polling that a moderate candidate you are rooting for has close to a zero percent chance of winning a single state, it absolutely makes the average American voter feel disgruntled. It doesn’t matter if there are 500 moderate candidates running. If the voter believes they don’t stand a chance, it drives them away. And that’s the narrative that has been driven for a year. The dismissive attitude leftists has towards moderates is potentially catastrophic for any candidate come November. Our voices matter. Period. If you think they don’t, you’ll see for yourselves when Trump wins in November. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,729 Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 1 minute ago, Lois Griffin said: A lot of those claims, especially in the magnitude of attention they received, were largely a symptom of Pete performing better than Sanders in the caucus. Even so, there was nothing wrong with arguments about the integrity of the caucus. I was referring more to people calling him a "rat." Context matters. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bt1 5,213 Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 2 minutes ago, Brainiac said: Idk the final numbers yet. But with 84% reporting, we're at 250,000. Total turnout in 2016 was 250,000. Hm. That's not impressive, especially with so many choices on the table. We will see. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sethrb101 4,523 Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 1 minute ago, Azor Ahai said: That's what it says It says 9 each, I believe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azor Ahai 18,861 Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 Just now, sethrb101 said: It says 9 each, I believe. I swear they just changed it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,729 Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 Bernie is about to speak! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
derpmonster 22,412 Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 Bernie is projected to win now with very high certainty. There are enough votes in to call it. ABC declared him. Check out iTunes data & graphs at CHARTPOP.live Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sethrb101 4,523 Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 Looks like narrow victory for Bernie. I'm happy, but we certainly cannot get complacent On to rock Nevada Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.