Jump to content
celeb

Katy Perry sued for copyright


Bambino

Featured Posts

JazzGa

I see people who can't read on twitter etc. are saying that Katy is being sued for "copying" again but that ain't it sis, she is being sued for posting a pic of herself that a paparazzo took. 

Personally I think that the subject of a photo has certain ownership rights over that photo (to protect models from having their image used and protect the subjects of revenge p0rn) but I don't think the US laws agree with me 

My old cat is a tough man, but i cant deny the way he bites my hand and he stabs me, he grabs me by my heart <3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

These cases are so interesting to me. We've seen before when Gaga posts paparazzi pics to her instagram she credits the agency, and probably paid for them, or struck a deal. eg:

Lots of celebs probably do it without thinking, be it is technically the copyright holders prerogative to go after their claim. Just pay up Katy!

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOVEDRUG

i understand it if it was a fan account or some random ho from social media. but i think the subject of a photo should have the rights to their own likeness, even if someone else took the photo, it's their face. i'm not saying they should be able to do what they like with it, but they should be able to post it/save it/use it or whatever

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lilmonzter

Wtf this so bizarre 

Paparazzi photographers have too much freedom.

This is so wrong.

And I kinda blame her team not keeping check on her social media presence.

Sing C'est la vie 
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, GreenDiamond said:

imagine that someone sue you because you posted your picture he took

We don’t need to imagine it. It’s the law :air:

Link to post
Share on other sites

GreenDiamond
1 minute ago, Adarsh said:

We don’t need to imagine it. It’s the law :air:

ye I know but its really weird when u think about it...

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, GreenDiamond said:

ye I know but its really weird when u think about it...

I work in fashion so I’m probably used to it now. The photographer holds the copyright. Be it Richard Avedon or some random Paparazzo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Prismatic Light
38 minutes ago, Bambino said:

CopyKats will be CopyKats I guess :shrug:

:triggered: do you know what "copy" means at least? Because this is not a case of copying at all. 

More on topic tho:

This is so ****ing stupid :toofunny:

 What if instead of suing her, they asked to be credited/payed first?Literally every artist or fan posts this kind of "free" pics, and they want money now for a Pic of three years ago?! For real?! Imo They just want to spill her some money seeing what happened to her lately and how many people started to attack and hate her again, almost like in 2017, disgusting :madge:

She's such a soft genuine ball of sunshine, she doesn't deserve the **** is getting, I know it's not even 1/5 of what happened to witness maybe, but still, she's the most targeted by everyone... :heart:

Be kind 🧡
Link to post
Share on other sites

Prismatic Light

PS: wtf 150k dollars is nothing for a celebrity, Katy do some charity, pay them a few million dollars more and make them stfu xoxo 

Be kind 🧡
Link to post
Share on other sites

Midnightrush891
1 hour ago, Red said:

I’m gonna need the sisters from the astrological area to explain me why she is having such a rough time

I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again. She is paying for her sins. She shouldn’t have shaded Godney. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...