Billie Eilish shirtless for NYLON Magazine without consent

[Bonkers 29,666]

9 minutes ago, Ryusei said:

Lmao wtf who within that magazine thought it was a good idea to just put a picture on the cover without approval of the person they put on the cover and how could nobody stop it? I-  

Because Nylon Germany is barely a magazine.  

There are kids in cages because of racist immigration policies.  OUTRAGE

Pedophiles like Jeffrey Epstein get away with crimes because of money and power.  OUTRAGE.

A spin-off magazine in Germany makes a cyborg render of a popular pop star that doesn't show anything below the shoulders or sexualizes it, even.  WHO CARES?   This is the kind of wasted outrage that makes the left so annoying.  Should they have contacted her, sure, but they probably wouldn't have gotten an answer because they're barely a magazine, and nobody cares about magazines anymore.

Using salacious words like "shirtless"  really blow it far out of proportion.  

Edit: The cover is literally FAN ART with credit.  

Everybody wants to be a victim.  Billie ain't.

[whocares 2,122]

7 minutes ago, Bonkers said:

Because Nylon Germany is barely a magazine.  

There are kids in cages because of racist immigration policies.  OUTRAGE

Pedophiles like Jeffrey Epstein get away with crimes because of money and power.  OUTRAGE.

A spin-off magazine in Germany makes a cyborg render of a popular pop star that doesn't show anything below the shoulders or sexualizes it, even.  WHO CARES?   This is the kind of wasted outrage that makes the left so annoying.  Should they have contacted her, sure, but they probably wouldn't have gotten an answer because they're barely a magazine, and nobody cares about magazines anymore.

Using salacious words like "shirtless"  really blow it far out of proportion.  

Who exactly is not outraged about the kids in cages and Jeffrey Epstein’s case?

[Lilmonzter 2,864]

Wtf this is not okay they should've checked with her!

[Bonkers 29,666]

3 minutes ago, scarlxrd said:

Who exactly is not outrage about the kids in cages and Jeffrey Epstein’s case?

Congrats on missing the point.    (there are real problems in the world, FOCUS on those)  

The person who created this FAN ART has less 2000 followers on Instagram, just a guy who thought he made something cool.  Let's all go crazy and pretend that it's deep fake **** or something.


 

[whocares 2,122]

4 minutes ago, Bonkers said:

Congrats on missing the point.   (there are real problems in the world, FOCUS on those)  

The person who created this FAN ART has less 2000 followers on Instagram, just a guy who thought he made something cool.  Let's all go crazy and pretend that it's deep fake **** or something.


 

Everyone on social media has been talking about the issue with kids in cages for a long time now. When Jeffrey Epstein was found dead, it was a huge story and both the left and the right were outraged. Yes, this whole thing with Billie is not that serious. But people are allowed to be outraged about multiple things at the same time. You do know right? And this is a pop blog. We discuss anything related to pop stars. Not only politics.

[Morphine Prince 106,769]

Laughing and justifying no consent because y’all hate Billie? 

Yikes. 

Stan culture is toxic af. 

[Davian 44,859]

2 hours ago, Bonkers said:

Because Nylon Germany is barely a magazine.  

There are kids in cages because of racist immigration policies.  OUTRAGE

Pedophiles like Jeffrey Epstein get away with crimes because of money and power.  OUTRAGE.

A spin-off magazine in Germany makes a cyborg render of a popular pop star that doesn't show anything below the shoulders or sexualizes it, even.  WHO CARES?   This is the kind of wasted outrage that makes the left so annoying.  Should they have contacted her, sure, but they probably wouldn't have gotten an answer because they're barely a magazine, and nobody cares about magazines anymore.

Using salacious words like "shirtless"  really blow it far out of proportion.  

Edit: The cover is literally FAN ART with credit.  

Everybody wants to be a victim.  Billie ain't.

This comment is so unfair. You can’t just compare two problematic things to one another and cancel the other, because it’s ‘less’ problematic. 

You have no idea what young pop stars go through. She wants to keep herself private because people over sexualize girls in this business very quickly. Remember when she was spotted with a cleavage for the first time? The internet lost it and people saw her as sex object, which is a exactly what she did not wanted. That’s why she wears baggy clothes. She is 17

[Bonkers 29,666]

1 minute ago, scarlxrd said:

Everyone on social media has been talking about the issue with kids in cages for a long time now. When Jeffrey Epstein was found dead, it was a huge story and both the left and the right were outraged. Yes, this is whole thing with Billie is not that serious. But people are allowed to be outraged about multiple things at the same time. You do know right?

And i'm allowed to point out that it's annoying and pathetic.  You know that, right?

[whocares 2,122]

24 minutes ago, Bonkers said:

And i'm allowed to point out that it's annoying and pathetic.  You know that, right?

You tried to make a point about leftists being outraged about things that don’t matter when on this same blog people have made many threads regarding Trump and his atrocious policies. This is a pop blog. People will talk about pop stars. You tried to be more woke than everyone here and failed.

[Ryusei 61,110]

15 minutes ago, Bonkers said:

Because Nylon Germany is barely a magazine.  

There are kids in cages because of racist immigration policies.  OUTRAGE

Pedophiles like Jeffrey Epstein get away with crimes because of money and power.  OUTRAGE.

A spin-off magazine in Germany makes a cyborg render of a popular pop star that doesn't show anything below the shoulders or sexualizes it, even.  WHO CARES?   This is the kind of wasted outrage that makes the left so annoying.  Should they have contacted her, sure, but they probably wouldn't have gotten an answer because they're barely a magazine, and nobody cares about magazines anymore.

Using salacious words like "shirtless"  really blow it far out of proportion.  

Edit: The cover is literally FAN ART with credit.  

Everybody wants to be a victim.  Billie ain't.

Well i wasnt outraged it just made me facepalm who would do that. When i read shirtless i thought it would be one of those hands covering the boobs pictures while this could literally be someone wearing a strapless dress or smth underneath. And this is still a forum about pop culture, we have seperate politics threads. 

[JazzGa 14,621]

Yep yep, even though it's technically a gold robot or whatever, it is definitely tasteless to photoshop a woman's eyes onto a naked body without her permission and then publish it. Glad Billie called them out

[SHALLOW 16,456]

I mean... you can’t even see tits but if she didn’t like it, well it’s ok to call them out i guess

[JazzGa 14,621]

28 minutes ago, lego said:

really creepy 

 

and their edit - non apology - sucks, they should remove this. 

It's really gross that they are projecting their fembot fantasies on a young lady who wants no part in male fantasies of submissive servant space babes.

[geopang 4,831]

This is outrage over nothing. Your shoulders are showing, boo hoo.  

[gag 22,449]

20 minutes ago, Bonkers said:

And i'm allowed to point out that it's annoying and pathetic.  You know that, right?

So why are you wasting your time getting outraged over people’s outrage? Where are your threads on Epstein and ICE? 

Since you think people can only care about one thing at a time, is this thread the only thing you care about right now? 

OT: This could’ve been so easily fixed my GOD... cyborg imagery always has that turtleneck looking metallic suit. They literally didn’t have to make her shirtless.