Chromatislaps 34,854 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 ... perhaps it's time to put those people in the garbage rivers of Indonesia or in desertifying regions of the world..see if they think any different then...disgusting folks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cavadour 2,749 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 She's a courageous and literate young lady. Age is no boundary for speaking wise. I love that. And shame to the old reargard's mocking a$$hoĀ£ā¬s ! I'm probably beyond the two thirds of my life but I love the idea of leaving this planet one day in the hands of young people like her who will take much care of our beloved home worldĀ than my generation has ever done.Ā Late to the party but I got a diamond heart Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoonIsRising 2,816 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 39 minutes ago, adterp said: Honestly, since whenĀ gays have become privileged enough to beĀ that conservative ? Are you scared of herĀ ? Ā 45 minutes ago, ToughHooker said: where is the proof? receipt? you need to back your words up a little bit more, as it seems right now your statement is just weak nonsense Can you have a discussion without being agressive ? Omg you are embarrassingĀ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jill 31,812 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 3 hours ago, Didymus said: Joan of Arc of climate change is this supposed to be an insult lmao Former First Lady of the United States. Now card-carrying member of the Communist Party of China (CPC). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoonIsRising 2,816 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 1 hour ago, Didymus said: Can you expand on this a liitle? Do some research of the relation between Greta and Ingmar Rentzhog (cofundator of the start-up We Don't Have Time). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jill 31,812 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 1 hour ago, LePetitFlo said: She's under the control of some lobbies and politicians... I can't stand her and I understand why they want to boycott her.Ā Sure. Like always, boycotting a child is a sign of maturity and surely a proof of the evolution of human race. Oh! And guess what? She's saying things that are truthful and based on scientific facts. Even if she is "under the control of some lobbies and politicians" (which she's not, but whatever floats your boat), what wrong about it if the message is the correct one? And also, how can you possibly not stand a child literally working to save the planet? You might not agree with her, that's fine, do whatever you want, ignore all the scientific reports you want, but at least be AN ADULT and be happy about the activism of the new generation and the guts necessary to be like this and say things like those. Good lord what did my eyes just readĀ Former First Lady of the United States. Now card-carrying member of the Communist Party of China (CPC). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jill 31,812 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 3 minutes ago, LePetitFlo said: Do some research of the relation between Greta and Ingmar Rentzhog (cofundator of the start-up We Don't Have Time). No no no. You can't just say something and then refer to a wide topic and ask those who want proof to do the research themselves. When you say something and you don't provide any proof and that proof is being requested by another person, YOU GIVE THE PROOF. Imagine if a scientist said "the universe was actually created last year" and the scientists say "well, okay, give us proof", and the scientist said "reasearch about the red theory". Well, no. You give me the red theory, you put the proof behind your words. You say the things, you prove them. Don't come here and say "well, research x and x". Explain the research, explain how did you reach that conclusion of yours.Ā Former First Lady of the United States. Now card-carrying member of the Communist Party of China (CPC). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marilyn MonHoe 11,011 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Right wing politicians acting like clownsĀ all overĀ the world wbk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoonIsRising 2,816 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 4 minutes ago, The Bad Joker said: No no no. You can't just say something and then refer to a wide topic and ask those who want proof to do the research themselves. When you say something and you don't provide any proof and that proof is being requested by another person, YOU GIVE THE PROOF. Imagine if a scientist said "the universe was actually created last year" and the scientists say "well, okay, give us proof", and the scientist said "reasearch about the red theory". Well, no. You give me the red theory, you put the proof behind your words. You say the things, you prove them. Don't come here and say "well, research x and x". Explain the research, explain how did you reach that conclusion of yours.Ā But I am not a scientist. Omg why are you so agressive ? Just read some articles. It's better than aĀ random user from a forum. I can doĀ some mistakes... And it's midnight here I am f* tired.Ā You are really embarrassing on thisĀ Ā forum.Ā Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jill 31,812 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 1 minute ago, LePetitFlo said: But I am not a scientist. Omg why are you so agressive ? Just read some articles. It's better than aĀ random user from a forum. I can doĀ some mistakes... And it's midnight here I am f* tired.Ā You are really embarrassing on thisĀ Ā forum.Ā I am aggressive? You just said you understand how a group of old ass men are boycotting a 16-year old. And you call me aggressive? It's not my fault that you're tired, you just said something without backing it up and I don't care if you're tired, you can't just say something and leave the room and then come back and say "research" and then leave again. Like, no.Ā Yeah sure, I am embarrassing, says the guy who thinks boycotting a young girl is a good thing. Former First Lady of the United States. Now card-carrying member of the Communist Party of China (CPC). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoonIsRising 2,816 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, LePetitFlo said: But I am not a scientist. Omg why are you so agressive ? Just read some articles. It's better than aĀ random user from a forum. I can doĀ some mistakes... And it's midnight here I am f* tired.Ā You are really embarrassing on thisĀ Ā forum.Ā Ā 4 minutes ago, The Bad Joker said: No no no. You can't just say something and then refer to a wide topic and ask those who want proof to do the research themselves. When you say something and you don't provide any proof and that proof is being requested by another person, YOU GIVE THE PROOF. Imagine if a scientist said "the universe was actually created last year" and the scientists say "well, okay, give us proof", and the scientist said "reasearch about the red theory". Well, no. You give me the red theory, you put the proof behind your words. You say the things, you prove them. Don't come here and say "well, research x and x". Explain the research, explain how did you reach that conclusion of yours.Ā And it's very difficult to explain. I am sorry if you are lazy to read some articles made by some activists.Ā I will say one thing: Gretta is controlled by some start up and lobbies and they make some money thanks to her speech. Also her speeches are extract of some articles made by big activists.Ā Ā Ā Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoonIsRising 2,816 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 1 minute ago, The Bad Joker said: I am aggressive? You just said you understand how a group of old ass men are boycotting a 16-year old. And you call me aggressive? It's not my fault that you're tired, you just said something without backing it up and I don't care if you're tired, you can't just say something and leave the room and then come back and say "research" and then leave again. Like, no.Ā Yeah sure, I am embarrassing, says the guy who thinks boycotting a young girl is a good thing. Yes. You are aggressive. But it's not my job to educate yourself.Ā Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jill 31,812 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 5 minutes ago, LePetitFlo said: Yes. You are aggressive. But it's not my job to educate yourself.Ā No, you're right. But it is your job to educate yourself and stop thinking boycotting a young girl is justifiable. I prefer coming off as aggressive any day to thinking that that is a justifiable action. Like you said, Ā Former First Lady of the United States. Now card-carrying member of the Communist Party of China (CPC). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoonIsRising 2,816 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 They boycott her for 2 reasons:Ā 1. We have to stop to instrumentalize a 16-year-old and to stop to make business on her. 2. France received her on the same day of the adoption of the CETA by the AssemblĆ©e Nationale wich is very "unecologic" and in contrary to Gretta's speech. Also Gretta didn't even know what was the treaty CETA. This shocking of her and a proof that she don't know nothing about the emergency of the situation. France was hypocritical to invite her on the same day of the adoption of the treaty.Ā Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoonIsRising 2,816 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 4 minutes ago, The Bad Joker said: No, you're right. But it is your job to educate yourself and stop thinking boycotting a young girl is justifiable. I prefer coming off as aggressive any day to thinking that that is a justifiable action. Like you said, Ā Ā Just now, LePetitFlo said: They boycott her for 2 reasons:Ā 1. We have to stop to instrumentalize a 16-year-old and to stop to make business on her. 2. France received her on the same day of the adoption of the CETA by the AssemblĆ©e Nationale wich is very "unecologic" and in contrary to Gretta's speech. Also Gretta didn't what was the treaty CETA. This shocking of her and a proof that she don't know nothing about the emergency of the situation. France was hypocritical to invite her on the same day of the adoption of the treaty.Ā Now I explained what happened yesterday and why the boycott is justified.Ā Kiss, xoxo, joanne Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.