Tati Didn't Cancel James Charles (Cancel Culture)?

[Bt1 5,213]

3 hours ago, JR Gg said:

And another uneducated comment on the issue defending James' errors.

Okay, but... but... but... hypocrisy should be canceled. Yeah, I agree, but what should be CANCELED first are the ones who have obviously no comprehensive view of the story and taking the "victim"'s side. This "victim" became one because of his own mistakes, not because others called him out.

Tati could've made the video and receive no response or become the one that's canceled because of her 'hypocrisy'. Guess what? It didn't happen, and that's for a reason. You should be friends with this other user on another thread rationalising James' actions.

 

I dont care about James. If there are other stories with ^straight^ guys, he should be cancelled,  as long as they arent as the waiter story, who admitted that he had interest in James. 

 

But, lets not forget that this story came out because Tati wrongly accused James of doing nasty things against her brand. Thats why its sad that people acclaim and sustain the hypocrite Tati, who sold her friend because her bussines interest.

If there are other accusations against James, he also should be cancelled as long as they are serious. But after the hypocrite Tati. 

U should also be cancelled if you open a topic,  someone doesnt agree with you and instead responding to the points I made, you start sending me to other users that arent in this discussion. 

[JR Gg 12,985]

22 minutes ago, Florin said:

I dont care about James. If there are other stories with ^straight^ guys, he should be cancelled,  as long as they arent as the waiter story, who admitted that he had interest in James. 

 

But, lets not forget that this story came out because Tati wrongly accused James of doing nasty things against her brand. Thats why its sad that people acclaim and sustain the hypocrite Tati, who sold her friend because her bussines interest.

If there are other accusations against James, he also should be cancelled as long as they are serious. But after the hypocrite Tati. 

U should also be cancelled if you open a topic,  someone doesnt agree with you and instead responding to the points I made, you start sending me to other users that arent in this discussion. 

How is the story wrong? 

I didn't open a topic.

Never mind. Don't respond to this. I'm not here to discuss irrelevant people.

 

[Bt1 5,213]

17 minutes ago, JR Gg said:

How is the story wrong? 

I didn't open a topic.

Never mind. Don't respond to this. I'm not here to discuss irrelevant people.

 

He simply promoted a brand that helped him with a problem. 

Irrelevant people? What makes a person relevant on a forum? :)) the problem is that you already responded twice. What makes that of you? :)) 

[JR Gg 12,985]

1 hour ago, Florin said:

He simply promoted a brand that helped him with a problem. 

Irrelevant people? What makes a person relevant on a forum? :)) the problem is that you already responded twice. What makes that of you? :)) 

You're so naïve to believe that, even with the evidence piling up to suggest that he contacted the brand himself.

 

 

 

All these beauty influencers play no role in my life, hence they are irrelevant to me. I responded twice because of your one-sided arguments that are uneducated on the issue.

*What does that make of you?* *Note the grammar mistake

It makes me smart because I decided to end this discussion about people I don't care about with a person I don't care about :)) Have a nice day of realisation :))

[Bt1 5,213]

9 minutes ago, JR Gg said:

You're so naïve to believe that, even with the evidence piling up to suggest that he contacted the brand himself.

 

 

 

All these beauty influencers play no role in my life, hence they are irrelevant to me. I responded twice because of your one-sided arguments that are uneducated on the issue.

*What does that make of you?* *Note the grammar mistake

It makes me smart because I decided to end this discussion about people I don't care about with a person I don't care about :)) Have a nice day of realisation :))

English is not my first language. Is phatetic to use irelevant things like this when its clear you are loosing against *one-sided* arguments.

I can also put out a video that says that James need it some help and thats how he got in contact with that company. But already we are talking about some other topics and its clear that no one can stand the other person. 

So, go away and continue to support hypocrisy. I dont support the hypocrite Tati and I wont support James, if some serious accusations against him can be proven. 

U stay mad and one-sided smart, whatever that means. Bye. 

[2School4Cool 6,430]

13 hours ago, rumours said:

Loved your overall comment btw

This part in particular though is where I start to get frustrated I guess. While there is certainly nuance in each situation that can be analyzed, where do we draw the line? Moreover, how do we make sure that the line is not only fair but is used in an equitable fashion over all those who make mistakes. 

Like... James for example has had other scandals... what about this one led people to “cancel” him? Are there certain actions or behavioral traits that make us more likely to cancel individuals?...

Moreover, it seems like our ability to improve efficiency via technological innovation has stifled our ability to recognize and accept human error. 

 

Sorry for the all the questions and words... this whole “cancel culture” phenomenon has just been something I’ve been thinking about a lot lately. I’m not 100% sure where I stand on it. 

I absolutely get what you mean, and I guess I don’t really have an answer either. I feel like it’s hard to have a strict guideline when each individual case is so unique. Think about it like a friend that does something you don’t like. It’s up to you to know when you’ve had enough and want to cut them out of your life. It’s also up to you to decide if you think they should be forgiven and so you make up and move forward with your friendship. It’s difficult to find a specific line to cross for cancel culture when everyone has their view on whether something is “cancel” worthy. I guess someone is cancelled when the amount of people who are done with the person is large enough to essentially ruin their career.