WildAmerican 13,672 Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 can we make sure to not just post random numbers w/out a heading or title? There's a lot of metrics to keep track of thank u Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
messybottom 10,579 Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 Just now, WildAmerican said: can we make sure to not just post random numbers w/out a heading or title? There's a lot of metrics to keep track of thank u they are fixing it sis. it was a mistake Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerellM 1,496 Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 Shallow Apple Music : #24 (+2) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LetsGetHigh 52,683 Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 3 minutes ago, The Cure said: Ooops sorry. I meant to post it for work. I'm working while browsing GGD. A "My dog ate my homework" excuse teas Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCureinMalibu 45,913 Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 3 minutes ago, The Cure said: Ooops sorry. I meant to post it for work. I'm working while browsing GGD. you highlighted the sentence. There is no way on earth this was a mistake Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HolyDelRey 21,101 Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 In 2009, a video of a fan dancing to Bon Jovi’s 1987 ballad “Livin’ on a Prayer” went viral with over 15MM views, causing the song to sneak its way onto the charts. How did this happen? Since 2013, Billboard and Nielsen count YouTube streams toward their charts. Ownership of the sound recording of “Livin’ on a Prayer” on the viral video was claimed via YouTube’s Content ID using the song’s International Sound Recording Code (ISRC). Since streams against an ISRC are now counted toward charts, the 15MM streams on this video propelled “Livin’ on a Prayer” to No.25 on Billboard’s Hot 100 Chart 26 years after it was originally released. https://stem.is/why-youtube-matters-to-musicians/ The only prisons that exist are ones we put each other in.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jollibee 3,179 Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 1 minute ago, HolyDelRey said: In 2009, a video of a fan dancing to Bon Jovi’s 1987 ballad “Livin’ on a Prayer” went viral with over 15MM views, causing the song to sneak its way onto the charts. How did this happen? Since 2013, Billboard and Nielsen count YouTube streams toward their charts. Ownership of the sound recording of “Livin’ on a Prayer” on the viral video was claimed via YouTube’s Content ID using the song’s International Sound Recording Code (ISRC). Since streams against an ISRC are now counted toward charts, the 15MM streams on this video propelled “Livin’ on a Prayer” to No.25 on Billboard’s Hot 100 Chart 26 years after it was originally released. https://stem.is/why-youtube-matters-to-musicians/ They better get the ownership of the videos from the performance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
messybottom 10,579 Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 3 minutes ago, HolyDelRey said: In 2009, a video of a fan dancing to Bon Jovi’s 1987 ballad “Livin’ on a Prayer” went viral with over 15MM views, causing the song to sneak its way onto the charts. How did this happen? Since 2013, Billboard and Nielsen count YouTube streams toward their charts. Ownership of the sound recording of “Livin’ on a Prayer” on the viral video was claimed via YouTube’s Content ID using the song’s International Sound Recording Code (ISRC). Since streams against an ISRC are now counted toward charts, the 15MM streams on this video propelled “Livin’ on a Prayer” to No.25 on Billboard’s Hot 100 Chart 26 years after it was originally released. https://stem.is/why-youtube-matters-to-musicians/ Yeah, those performances will only help us. She's coming for #1 or #2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supersonic 49,376 Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 Just now, The Cure said: They better get the ownership of the videos from the performance. They probably can‘t. The material legally belongs to ABC, not to Gaga or her label. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boris2 9,239 Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 Red Updates Joking, we are still on top with a huge lead, in Donald Trumps voice* Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildAmerican 13,672 Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 lmao at this coming out today Next week: Billboard Hot 100: #1(+20) Shallow, @ladygaga & Bradley Cooper [22 weeks]. * new peak* but only if you keep streaming on paid streaming services! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jollibee 3,179 Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 1 minute ago, Supersonic said: They probably can‘t. The material legally belongs to ABC, not to Gaga or her label. Then pay ABC to get the rights. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HolyDelRey 21,101 Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 Just now, Supersonic said: They probably can‘t. The material legally belongs to ABC, not to Gaga or her label. They can claim because they own the audio. The only prisons that exist are ones we put each other in.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supersonic 49,376 Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 1 minute ago, HolyDelRey said: They can claim because they own the audio. Legally, they actually don‘t Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
messybottom 10,579 Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 6 minutes ago, Supersonic said: They probably can‘t. The material legally belongs to ABC, not to Gaga or her label. they don't own the song tho. That's all they need Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.10c61c56b89277877cddc2c2817a5001.jpg)
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.