Jump to content
politics

Former Starbucks CEO might run as an independent in 2020


Morphine Prince

Featured Posts

Whispering
On 1/26/2019 at 10:37 PM, derpmonster said:

Yup. We don't need another neoliberal disguised as a progressive because they use idpol to their advantage but without meaning it and yet representing big corps... 

The Starbucks "diversity training" coming through :ladyhaha:

He isn’t far left, he’s a moderate. He is going to try and pull from moderate Independents, Republicans and Democrats. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

LordEnigma
34 minutes ago, Whispering said:

He will have to spend tens of millions of dollars to get on the ballot. That will come out of his pocket. This run will cost him money, not make him money. 

I mean it seemed like Trump didn’t REALLY want to win since he was planning on starting his own TV channel if he lost. Meaning he essentially invested money for promotion so he could start another business venue. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

derpmonster
3 hours ago, Whispering said:

He isn’t far left, he’s a moderate. He is going to try and pull from moderate Independents, Republicans and Democrats. 

Did you quote the wrong person? :huh:

Who said far left? 

Check out iTunes data & graphs at CHARTPOP.live
Link to post
Share on other sites

An independent would have a hard time getting support from either party for his agenda, whatever that is. Zero political experience. Doubt he would be able to hire experienced democratic staff running as independent.  He would take a few percent of votes, causing the Republican to win.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
On 1/26/2019 at 4:03 PM, GypsyVida said:

Can people with no prior political background and / or experience stop running for president? We saw how that went already so.....

I mean so did Obama and he wasn't that bad

 

Justin Trudeau here in Canada also went straight to PM... I wish he had more balls sometimes but he isn't that terrible either

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morphine Prince
10 minutes ago, Economy said:

I mean so did Obama and he wasn't that bad

 

Justin Trudeau here in Canada also went straight to PM... I wish he had more balls sometimes but he isn't that terrible either

Obama served in the Illinois Senate for three terms and then got elected to the US Senate.... then he ran for president. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
53 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said:

Obama served in the Illinois Senate for three terms and then got elected to the US Senate.... then he ran for president. 

Ah thanks for correcting that. I had heard on the media before that he wasn't a politician

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whispering
8 hours ago, derpmonster said:

Did you quote the wrong person? :huh:

Who said far left? 

You said “a progressive”. He’s not claiming to be. 

He says he’s a centrist, and his policies thus far show that to be true. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

derpmonster
1 minute ago, Whispering said:

You said “a progressive”. He’s not claiming to be. 

He says he’s a centrist, and his policies thus far show that to be true. 

Ah, I don't think progressive means "far-left."

He would still be running as a Democrat and Democrat voters want a progressive. He is a centrist pretty much but he will be attacked by progressives over many issues and that will divide the Democratic vote. 

He also says he's "in favor of universalizing healthcare" :ally: That's a progressive take. But he also takes a lot of money from the oil industry. #2 in the whole Congress actually. And he's also for increasing punishments for crime which we know will impact some communities and drug users more than others instead of helping rehabilitate. So yeah, he will not be liked at all by the progressives and we'll end up with a "slightly more relatable Hillary Clinton" situation.

Check out iTunes data & graphs at CHARTPOP.live
Link to post
Share on other sites

Whispering
3 minutes ago, derpmonster said:

Ah, I don't think progressive means "far-left."

He would still be running as a Democrat and Democrat voters want a progressive. He is a centrist pretty much but he will be attacked by progressives over many issues and that will divide the Democratic vote. 

He also says he's "in favor of universalizing healthcare" :ally: That's a progressive take. But he also takes a lot of money from the oil industry. #2 in the whole Congress actually. And he's also for increasing punishments for crime which we know will impact some communities and drug users more than others instead of helping rehabilitate. So yeah, he will not be liked at all by the progressives and we'll end up with a "slightly more relatable Hillary Clinton" situation.

His policy remarks thus far are not in line with the majority of the Democratic Party at this time. 

On healthcare:  “Every American deserves the right to have access to quality health care,” Schultz told “60 Minutes” correspondent Scott Pelley. “But what the Democrats are proposing is something that is as false as the wall ― and that is free health care for all, which the country cannot afford.”

Huh? He isn’t a member of Congress. 

On the Democratic Party: "It concerns me that so many voices within the Democratic Party are going so far to the left. I say to myself, 'How are we going to pay for these things,' in terms of things like single payer (and) people espousing the fact that the government is going to give everyone a job."

On Entitlements: Schultz went on to say that the greatest threat domestically to the country is "this $21 trillion debt hanging over the cloud of America and future generations. The only way we're going to get out of that is we've got to grow the economy, in my view, 4% or greater. And then we have to go after entitlements."

Going after entitlements is not in line with the Democratic Party. 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

derpmonster
Just now, Whispering said:

His policy remarks thus far are not in line with the majority of the Democratic Party at this time. 

On healthcare:  “Every American deserves the right to have access to quality health care,” Schultz told “60 Minutes” correspondent Scott Pelley. “But what the Democrats are proposing is something that is as false as the wall ― and that is free health care for all, which the country cannot afford.”

Huh? He isn’t a member of Congress. 

On the Democratic Party: "It concerns me that so many voices within the Democratic Party are going so far to the left. I say to myself, 'How are we going to pay for these things,' in terms of things like single payer (and) people espousing the fact that the government is going to give everyone a job."

On Entitlements: Schultz went on to say that the greatest threat domestically to the country is "this $21 trillion debt hanging over the cloud of America and future generations. The only way we're going to get out of that is we've got to grow the economy, in my view, 4% or greater. And then we have to go after entitlements."

Going after entitlements is not in line with the Democratic Party. 

 

 

 

 

:toofunny::air:

Ignore me, I forgot which thread I was in. I thought I was talking about Beto. Because I was talking about him somewhere else here.

Check out iTunes data & graphs at CHARTPOP.live
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...