Jump to content
lgbt

US votes against UN ban on Death Penalty For Homosexuality


Melech

Featured Posts

gabeoz

x3k2Cck.gif

Not shocked anymore. Afterall, we're the only nation in the world who refuses to stay in the Paris Accords. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Gagaloo911
14 hours ago, JustaMonster said:

Sure, but its still misleading to what the ban was actually for.

14 hours ago, Alexander Levi said:

Then maybe that's what should be in the title not just the homosexuality part :selena:

 

Yea, not really. It is still being complicit in a system that actively discriminates against and even executes "homosexuals" around the globe. The US needs to fulfill its role and duty as one of the leaders of this world and demonstrate to all other countries that this is not okay.

Voting against it as the US has now done will only give these countries incentive to keep these policies, potentially even enact worse ones, and show that there is no fallout or consequence for the violating and killing of innocent human beings around the world simply because of their sexuality.

This is not misleading at all, the US is telling the world this is okay be doing this. Even if at home there are no such domestic policies or ones that would do this being promoted, although with the route we seem to be taking in the US it wouldn't even be surprising if something like this were introduced somewhere in the US :madge:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not The Real Gaga
15 hours ago, Moebius said:

Are you ****ing kidding me? Are you like, literally ****ing kidding me?

The "democratic model of the world" thought this **** was right? How the **** is the US taken seriously anymore?

And what about the UN?

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/3/2017 at 10:06 AM, Morphine Prince said:

“It is important to point out that a ‘no’ vote on the resolution is not addressing same-sex relations, but the wider application of death penalty generally.

“The United States, for example, has the death penalty and has a consistent record of voting no on resolutions that are against it.”

 

Ok.... but why do we have the death penalty in the first place? It has no place in the modern world and has been proven to be more expensive than a life sentence. 

its more expensive to kill someone who is given a death penalty than feeding and housing them for life?

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/3/2017 at 10:33 AM, rpggal said:

Net immigration from Mexico has been negative for years. More people move from the US to Mexico than the other way around. 

that has to be a joke right? I literally have never met anyone who wants to move to Mexico.  Plus, isnt Mexico not very safe recently?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morphine Prince
1 hour ago, PeterPan said:

its more expensive to kill someone who is given a death penalty than feeding and housing them for life?

Yes. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
On 2017-10-03 at 10:53 AM, PartySick said:

Were we ever part of the progressive model countries club? I must have missed that memo :laughga:

The States being The States honestly.

Well the US was a leader in progress and freedom at one point... The US was the biggest influence in moving the Western world to the modern world it is now...

 

Its just that sometime after the 1950s it started falling behind other Developed Nations and now its Super Behind most of the OECD Nations :rip: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, PeterPan said:

wow i wasnt aware that many people did.  If less are coming in then why is there such a big deal of immigration?

Because Republicans need a racial scapegoat to explain to their poor white voting base where all the money they've been stealing and jobs they've been sending overseas went. Radical Islamic terrorism is extremely rare in this country as well and they make a big deal about that. Hell, they even talk about Sharia law like it's actually a thing that's happening here (I mean it is, but it's Christian Sharia law and they're the ones doing it). Same thing again with the trans bathroom debate. We often have a fact-free political discourse in this country because one party decided a few decades ago that facts had a liberal bias, and now everyone is forced to argue on the basis of emotions and "values" because we can't even agree on what a fact is anymore. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, rpggal said:

Because Republicans need a racial scapegoat to explain to their poor white voting base where all the money they've been stealing and jobs they've been sending overseas went. Radical Islamic terrorism is extremely rare in this country as well and they make a big deal about that. Hell, they even talk about Sharia law like it's actually a thing that's happening here (I mean it is, but it's Christian Sharia law and they're the ones doing it). Same thing again with the trans bathroom debate. We often have a fact-free political discourse in this country because one party decided a few decades ago that facts had a liberal bias, and now everyone is forced to argue on the basis of emotions and "values" because we can't even agree on what a fact is anymore. 

sorry but u lost me lol i dont know what ur saying

Link to post
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, PeterPan said:

sorry but u lost me lol i dont know what ur saying

lol no worries I'm just saying people care about it because Republicans tell them it's a problem, when it's not, and they believe it. Just like they tell them to be afraid of trans people and Muslims. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, rpggal said:

lol no worries I'm just saying people care about it because Republicans tell them it's a problem, when it's not, and they believe it. Just like they tell them to be afraid of trans people and Muslims. 

Alright

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...