Trump wants mass murder of terrorists, logic based on hoax

[Cuchulainn 3,040]

Just now, lego said:

 

He's talking about Muslims who are suspected to be terrorists or prisoners of war, he's talking about people who were not even terrorists in original story; he's calling for lawlessness and war crimes. Kill 49 and let last one live and go back to "his people"???

 

He's perpetuating the idea that pork is a kryptonite for Muslims, which is ignorant and islamophobic. Muslims and Jews don't eat pork, they're not afraid of it. This will not deter any future terrorist and it's idiotic to think so.

 

The story from the article assumes they are proven terrorists.

[lego 44,165]

Just now, Creativek said:

The story from the article assumes they are proven terrorists.

 

The story is fake. It's a hoax.

Terrorists don't live all together in a town full of terrorists, so kill 49 and send last one, back to his people? Really?

 

You are in favor of extrajudicial executions because terrorists take innocent lives and don't deserve to live. By that logic, do you know how many innocent lives were taken by the US in the Middle East? Oh, but only #westernlivesmatter right? 

 

 

[Michelle 2,056]

6 minutes ago, Creativek said:

So what do you think is "ok" treatment for terrorists who have killed many innocent people? I'm just curious.

Certainly not this and he's talking talking to his followers and it's not even a true thing which makes it worse. He's acting like this is ok to do. I don't know what I what I would do but he's taking it to a political place and that BS 

[lego 44,165]

13 minutes ago, Creativek said:

I felt people were thinking his comments were coming from a place of islamophobia, and I just didn't see any in this specific instance.

 

Of course it's coming from his islamophobic beliefs, it's blatantly obvious? Pigs blood??

 

[Cuchulainn 3,040]

3 minutes ago, lego said:

 

The story is fake. It's a hoax.

Terrorists don't live all together in a town full of terrorists, so kill 49 and send last one, back to his people? Really?

 

You are in favor of extrajudicial executions because terrorists take innocent lives and don't deserve to live. By that logic, do you know how many innocent lives were taken by the US in the Middle East? Oh, but only #westernlivesmatter right? 

 

 

If you want to discuss with me, I suggest you don't use hashtags that I don't believe in, or have ever said.

The story is a hoax, but the outrage here is about the idea of killing terrorists, who somehow have been equated to 'muslims'.

[lego 44,165]

5 minutes ago, Creativek said:

If you want to discuss with me, I suggest you don't use hashtags that I don't believe in, or have ever said.

The story is a hoax, but the outrage here is about the idea of killing terrorists, who somehow have been evoquated to 'muslims'.

 

He was talking about Muslim villagers and there's no proof they were even guilty of any crimes, there was an uprising, it was not "radical islamic terror" and believing that pigs blood will deter Muslim terrorist from future attacks is islamophobic because it's known that Muslims don't eat pork and consider it unclean.

 

[Michelle 2,056]

2 minutes ago, lego said:

 

He was talking about Muslim villagers and there's no proof they were even guilty of any crimes, there was an uprising, it was not "radical islamic terror" and believing that pigs blood will deter Muslim terrorist from future attacks is islamophobic because it's known that Muslims don't eat pork and consider it dirty. 

 

All of this 🙌🏼

[Cuchulainn 3,040]

3 minutes ago, lego said:

 

He was talking about Muslim villagers and there's no proof they were even guilty of any crimes, there was an uprising, it was not "radical islamic terror" and believing that pigs blood will deter Muslim terrorist from future attacks is islamophobic because it's known that Muslims don't eat pork and consider it unclean.

 

http://www.newsweek.com/who-general-pershing-trump-tweet-muslim-terrorists-pig-blood-bullets-false-652009

Where in this article is it mentioned that Trump was talking about Muslim villagers?

[lego 44,165]

10 minutes ago, Creativek said:

http://www.newsweek.com/who-general-pershing-trump-tweet-muslim-terrorists-pig-blood-bullets-false-652009

Where in this article is it mentioned that Trump was talking about Muslim villagers?

 

 

Do you even know what the story is about and where it happened? Check Snopes. 

You still see nothing wrong in calling for mass murder and war crimes? 

You still see nothing wrong in that he wasn't talking about terrorists in general, he wouldn't advocate this "strategy" against white supremacist terrorists, I wonder why? 

 

[lego 44,165]

25 minutes ago, Creativek said:

If you want to discuss with me, I suggest you don't use hashtags that I don't believe in, or have ever said.

 

 

Forget the hashtag, you didn't answer my question. You believe everyone who takes innocent life deserves to be murdered on the spot, isn't that what you said? 

 

[Cuchulainn 3,040]

6 minutes ago, lego said:

 

 

Do you even know what the story is about and where it happened? Check Snopes. 

You still see nothing wrong in calling for mass murder and war crimes? 

You still see nothing wrong in that he wasn't talking about terrorists in general, he wouldn't advocate this "strategy" against white supremacist terrorists, I wonder why? 

 

I just checked the snopes article. I'm still not entirely sure what you are talking about as far as 'he was talking about Muslim villagers'

He was talking about terrorists as Americans see terrorists. The average American isn't afraid of white supremacists  If events like last weekend happen more often and are subject to media coverage like we see in Europe every month or so, then I think white supremacists would start to be more feared and could eventually be called terrorists. They are murderers, but terrorism is something more than that.

I personally believe if murderers, terrorists, etc. are seen and or identified committing their crimes, they deserve to be executed given the circumstances.  Why should a person who has taken the lives of others be given due justice through our archaic court system?

[Cuchulainn 3,040]

16 minutes ago, lego said:

 

Forget the hashtag, you didn't answer my question. You believe everyone who takes innocent life deserves to be murdered on the spot, isn't that what you said? 

 

Don't tell me to forget a part of your post. If you don't want me to react to it, then don't say it. Nobody wants to be victim to passive aggressive behavior.

[lego 44,165]

2 minutes ago, Creativek said:

Don't tell me to forget a part of your post. If you don't want me to react to it, then don't say it. Nobody wants to be victim to passive aggressive behavior.

 

There's nothing passive aggressive about it, you just chose to clinge on it because you refuse to answer my question and you're doing it again. 

You really believe you are the victim now?

 

[Cuchulainn 3,040]

1 minute ago, lego said:

 

There's nothing passive aggressive about it, you just chose to clinge on it because you refuse to answer my question and you're doing it again. 

You really believe you are the victim now?

 

I've answered your question. Snarky indirect remarks and using hashtags that you think I might believe in are quite passive aggressive. So yes, I have fallen victim to those incidences of passive aggression.

[lego 44,165]

5 minutes ago, Creativek said:

I just checked the snopes article. I'm still not entirely sure what you are talking about as far as 'he was talking about Muslim villagers'

 

They were Muslim villagers from Moro province. Trump chose the story because of their religion and the myth about them being deterred by pigs blood. How do you not see that?

 

 

5 minutes ago, Creativek said:

He was talking about terrorists as Americans see terrorists.

 

Wow, you mean "brown, Middle Eastern"? "Muslim looking"? How do Americans see terrorists, please tell us more. 

 

5 minutes ago, Creativek said:

 

The average American isn't afraid of white supremacists  If events like last weekend happen more often and are subject to media coverage like we see in Europe every month or so, then I think white supremacists would start to be more feared and could eventually be called terrorists. They are murderers, but terrorism is something more than that.

 

The car attack in Cville was by definition a terrorist attack. White supremacists want to start racial war and their attacks have political background. 

The terrorism is not defined by who the average American fears more. That's the fault of American media. 

 

 

5 minutes ago, Creativek said:

I personally believe if murderers, terrorists, etc. are seen and or identified committing their crimes, they deserve to be executed given the circumstances.  Why should a person who has taken the lives of others be given due justice through our archaic court system?

 

So you are calling for mass murder and extrajudicial executions, just like your president, right? 

You were saying anyone who takes innocent lives deserves to be executed, so again what about innocent lives in ME taken by US military? Where's justice for them?

 

 

3 minutes ago, Creativek said:

I've answered your question. Snarky indirect remarks and using hashtags that you think I might believe in are quite passive aggressive. So yes, I have fallen victim to those incidences of passive aggression.

 

Then what's the point of engaging in political discussion if you're gonna get offended by a hashtag because that is exactly what you implied?? You did not answer, go back.