TheRoof 21,600 Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 I believe that the gay public does not bother , in fact they will support her logically speaking . Maybe in the grammys or in a ceremony with sufficient cover she could (COULD!!!) do it again But for now ..... let's wait to see if trump response Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
babs 5,093 Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 I wish she would do another speech like this for these sort of causes. That Portland speech is so goddamn effective from a listener point of view. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeleteMyAccount 11,881 Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 Wait... So does this mean we're getting BTW 2?!? But really, this ban is probably hits close to home considering her activism back in the DADT days. Glad to see Gaga taking a stand! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterPan 0 Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 1 hour ago, ryanripley said: near the start of gaga's career, the queen of justice was incredibly vocal about the equal rights of the LGBT community and specifically the Don't Ask Don't Tell moment. with the recent news of trump banning trans people from enlisting into the army and gaga having previously already being vocal on more than one occasion against trump, will we see the return of full on politicalga? with her own world tour starting in a short time, what are the chances she'll take advantage of her own time, space and money to spread messages of kindness, protest and acceptance upon the crowds and others who are watching? or has she spent too much time rebranding her reputation with the GP to potentially risk her hard work? maybe there's a chance she'll make pit stops to give speeches at rallies? what do you guys thinks and also, would you be here for it? cus i certainly am She can do whatever she wants Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustYouandI 2,483 Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 It worked with DADT because the Administration at the time wasn't "against" LGBT rights. But this time around the situation is entirely opposite. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.