Jump to content
The Evolution of Gaga
society

California might legally recognize 3rd gender


OBEY

Do you support this?   

188 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you support this? (anonymous)

    • YES!
      129
    • NO!
      59


Featured Posts

HOTNebraskaGuy
1 hour ago, Logan said:

I approve, but I don't think gender has a place on identity documentation. People should see others as humans, not genitals. Maybe that's too extreme for most people, but oh well. 

Gender is an important part of identity though. Your statement could easily evolve to "people she see others as humans, not race", and do you know how impractical BOTH statements are? What if they get lost/go missing? "Yeah guys were missing a person, but we can't tell you their gender, race, age, etc. because we should all see eachother as just people". 

One, five, ten lay a million on me
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply
MonsterPaws
1 hour ago, Logan said:

I approve, but I don't think gender has a place on identity documentation. People should see others as humans, not genitals. Maybe that's too extreme for most people, but oh well. 

I agree.

But being able to identify people's biological sex is extremely important (i.e. in health treatments), and quite a handful of still don't understand the difference between gender and sex.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HOTNebraskaGuy

Honesty I don't care what you identify as, and if this law is passed, kudos to everyone who's for it. I just believe things like this can become over complicating, you pass this and the next thing you know we have 20+ gender indentities that serve no actual purpose in the real world. 

One, five, ten lay a million on me
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sizzily

It'll take a while for me to get with that, it's just so strange to me. But whatever I guess.

Inside my head I have the best time
Link to post
Share on other sites

River

I'm always supporting laws that makes other people happy, unique and giving them the freedom to identify themselves as they feel inside.

so congrats to all of you, keep on fighting!!! and educating the society!!!:hug:

 

So sploosh your juice all over me you Riverboy
Link to post
Share on other sites

AndyDWUW

YES!!

 

We need to stop living in this binary world :tony:

 

Pop that bubble :tony:

Link to post
Share on other sites

MJHolland
2 hours ago, Logan said:

I approve, but I don't think gender has a place on identity documentation. People should see others as humans, not genitals. Maybe that's too extreme for most people, but oh well. 

Yeah... that's pretty extreme 

We need to be able to communicate what genders people appear to be for security reasons. E.g. at TSA so you can't impersonate someone or to identify a suspect on the run 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bebe

That seems totally fine and reasonable to me?

Like others have pointed out sex =/= gender, they are completely separate. Gender is a construction, it comes down to society and culture really.

Once upon a time pink was a masculine colour because it was a derivative of red, men in ancient Egypt wore makeup, Scottish men wore (and occasionally still do wear) kilts that are essentially skirts. Hell, even King Louis XIV wore high heels. Nowadays pink is seen as feminine, makeup is seen as feminine, skirts are seen as feminine and high heels are seen as feminine. 

That in itself shows that gender is a construction and is totally fluid and changing. There are plenty of people that simply don't fit into the rigid gender roles of today's society. It's not so easy to label them as male or female because those labels come with a set of gender expectations that they might not conform to.

Somebody who is female gendered typically present themselves as a 'female' in the sense of what we understand the gender of female to be (generally: long hair, dresses, highheels, makeup).

Somebody who is male gendered typically present themselves as 'male' in the sense of what we understand the gender of male to be (generally: short hair, facial hair, muscular, sporty).

Somebody whose gender is non-binary simply doesn't fit into either of those categories or doesn't identify with either of those roles. It refers to people whose identity does not conform unambiguously to conventional notions of male or female gender roles, but combines or moves between these genders.

We don't seem to have a problem with labelling those who present as female 'female' or those who present themselves as male 'male'. What's the problem with labelling those who don't fit into either of those narrow categories as 'non-binary'?
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

calmar

I'm agender, so I'm all for this. Wish I was going to California sometime soon :flop: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Moebius

Unnecessary :awkney:

The Most Popular Girls in School megarate is cancelled!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Addison Rae

I think that people are free to Do What U Want.mp3 with their bodies and believe what they want to believe as long as it doesn't harm anyone. 

But just because someone disagrees or doesn't understand doesn't mean that you have to be rude to them like I'm seeing in this thread. Acceptance goes both ways.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, whether you agree or disagree with it. 

sitting on his lap sipping diet pepsi
Link to post
Share on other sites

Drin Lon
11 hours ago, Logan said:

I approve, but I don't think gender has a place on identity documentation. People should see others as humans, not genitals. Maybe that's too extreme for most people, but oh well. 

Gender doesn't have to do with sb's genitals tho,

Gender is just a social construct so I'm all for this law :lana:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Erotica
22 minutes ago, Moebius said:

Unnecessary :awkney:

Maybe for you, but not for the ones who need it :awkney: 

Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...